skip to main content
research-article

Search based software test data generation for structural testing: a perspective

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Software testing is an important and expensive phase of the software development life cycle. Over the past few decades, there has been an ongoing research to automate the process of software testing but the attempts have been constrained by the size and the complexity of software especially due to the use of dynamic memory allocation which makes the software behavior highly unpredictable. The use of metaheuristic global search techniques for software test data generation has been the focus of researchers in recent years. Many new techniques and hybrid methods have been proposed to tackle the problem more effectively. This study provides an overview of the various techniques that have been applied for structural test data generation. It also presents the open areas, challenges and future directions in the field of search based software testing with an emphasis on test data generation for structural testing.

References

  1. Ahmed, M. A., & Hermadi, I. (2007). GA-based multiple paths test data generator. Elsevier Computers and Operations Research, 35, 3107--3124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ali, S., Briand, L. C., Hemmati, H., & Walawege R. K. P. (2010, November/December). A Systematic Review of the Application and Empirical Investigation of Search-Based Test Case Generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 36(6), 742--762. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andreou, A. S., Economides, K. A., & Sofokleous, A. A. (2007). An automatic software test-generation scheme based on data flow criteria and genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the IEEE Seventh International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, pp. 867--872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andrews, J. H., Briand, L. C., Labiche, Y., & Namin, A. S. (2006, March). Mutation Analysis for Assessing and Comparing Testing Coverage Criteria. Carleton University, TR SCE-06-02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertolino, A. (2007). Software Testing Research: Achievements, Challenges, Dreams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Future of Software Engineering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. DeMillo, R. A., & Ofutt, A. J. (1991, September). Constraintbased automatic test data generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(9), 900--910. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ferguson, R., & Korel, B. (1996). The chaining approach for software test data generation. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 5(1), 63--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Frankl, P. G., & Weiss, S. N. (1993, August). An Experimental Comparison of the Effectiveness of Branch Testing and Data Flow Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(8), 774--787. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ghiduk, A. S., Harrold, M. J., & Girgis, M. R. (2007). Using Genetic Algorithms to Aid Test-Data Generation for Data-Flow Coverage. In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Girgis, M. R. (2005). Automatic Test Data Generation for Data Flow Testing Using a Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Universal computer Science, 11(6), 898--915.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gong, D., & Yao, X. (2010). Automatic detection of infeasible paths in software testing. IET Software, 4(5), 361--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Harman, M. (2007). The Current State and Future of Search Based Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, Minneapolis, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Harman, M., & McMinn., P. (2010). A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Search Based Testing: Local, Global and Hybrid Search. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 36(2), 226--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harman, M., Lakhotia, K., & McMinn, P. (2007). A Multi-Objective Approach To Search-Based Test Data Generation. ACM GECCO, pp. 1098--1105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harman, M., Mansouri, S. A., & Zhang, Y. (2009, April). Search Based Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Analysis and Review of Trends Techniques and Applications. Technical Report. TR-09-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Korel, B. (1990). Automated Software Test Data Generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(8), 870--879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lakhotia, K. (2009, October). Search-Based Testing. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Computer Science, King's College, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lakhotia, K., McMinn, P., & Harman, M. (2009). Automated Test Data Generation for Coverage: Haven't We Solved This Problem Yet?. In Proceedings of the 4th Testing Academia and Industry Conference " Practice and Research Techniques (TAIC PART 09), UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Li, K., Zhang, Z., & Kou, J. (2010, February). Breeding Software Test Data with Genetic-Particle Swarm Mixed Algorithm. Journal of Computers, 5(2), 258--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Malhotra, R., & Garg, M. (2011, June). An Adequacy Based Test Data Generation Technique Using Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 7(2), 363--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. McMinn, P. (2004, June). Search-Based Software Test Data Generation: A Survey. Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 14(2), 105--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. McMinn, P. (2013, January). An Identification of Program Factors that Impact Crossover Performance in Evolutionary Test Input Generation for the Branch Coverage of C Programs. Information and Software Technology, 55(1), 153--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McMinn, P., Harman, M., Hassoun, Y., Lakhotia, K., & Wegener J. (2012). Input Domain Reduction through Irrelevant Variable Removal and its Effect on Local, Global and Hybrid Search-Based Structural Test Data Generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 38(2), 453--477. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Michael, C. C., McGraw, G. E., & Schatz, M. A. (2001, December). Generating Software Test Data by Evolution. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(12), 1085--1110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Myers, G. J. (2004). The Art of Software Testing. New Jersey: Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nayak, N., & Mohapatra, D. P. (2010). Automatic Test Data Generation for Data Flow Testing Using Particle Swarm Optimization. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Pargas, R. P., Harrold, M. J., & Peck, R. (1999). Test-Data Generation Using Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 9(4), 263--282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Yang, X. S. (2010), Engineering Optimization: An Introduction with Metaheuristic Applications. New Jersey: Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Search based software test data generation for structural testing: a perspective
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader