skip to main content
research-article

Moderated online social therapy: Designing and evaluating technology for mental health

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 February 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Although the use and prevalence of Web-based mental health applications have grown over the past decade, many of these services suffer high rates of attrition. This is problematic, as face-to-face support for mental health is limited. To determine appropriate design guidelines for increasing engagement, we conducted a study of First-Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients and reviewed theories on the use of existing online services. We produced a set of design goals, developed an online application that combined social networking and online therapy within a clinician-moderated site, and conducted a 6-week trial with a group of young FEP patients. The design goals, based on existing theory including Supportive Accountability and Positive Psychology, are operationlised through a model we call Moderated Online Social Therapy (MOST). The trial results indicate that our implementation achieved the design goals and that the MOST model can inform the development of more effective and engaging online therapies.

References

  1. R. Agarwal. 2000. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage 1. MIS Quarterly 24, 4, 665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Alvarez-Jimenez, et al. 2011. Preventing the second episode: A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial and pharmacological trials in first-episode psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 37, 3, 619--630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Alvarez-Jimenez, et al. 2013. On the HORYZON: Moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 143, 1, 143--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. Andersson and P. Culjpers. 2009. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behavior Therapy 38, 4, 196--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Arguello, et al. 2006. Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In CHI'06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Baams. 2011. Internet use and online social support among same sex attracted individuals of different ages. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 5, 1820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. A. Bargh, K. McKenna, and G. Fitzimmons. 2002. Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58, 1, 33--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Barratt. 2011. Discussing illicit drugs in public Internet forums: Visibility, stigma, and pseudonomity. In C&T'11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Beattie. 2009. Primary-care patients' expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A qualitative study. Health Expectations 12, 1, 45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. T. W. Bickmore, et al. 2010. Maintaining reality: Relational agents for antipsychotic medication adherence. Interacting with Computers 22, 4, 276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Birchwood, E. Spencer, and D. McGovern. 2000. Schizophrenia: Early warning signs. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 6, 93--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Boyd. 2007. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, Buckingham, D. (Ed.) MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Calvo and D. Peters 2012. Positive computing: Technology for a wiser world. Interactions 19, 4, 28--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Campbell, et al. 2000. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal 321, 694--696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G. Castelnuovo, et al. 2003. New and old tools in psychotherapy: The use of technology for the integration of the traditional clinical treatments. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 40, 1--2, 33--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. A. Celio, et al. 2000. Reducing risk factors for eating disorders: Comparison of an Internet- and a classroom-delivered psychoeducational program. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology 68, 4, 650--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Christensen, et al. 2006. Free range users and one hit wonders: Community users of an Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy program. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40, 59--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. P. Corrigan. 2004. How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist 29, 7, 614--625.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. W. Corrigan. 1998. The impact of stigma on severe mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 5, 201--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. Coyle, et al. 2007. Computers in talk-based mental health interventions. Interacting with Computers 19, 4, 545--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. Coyle, et al. 2011. Exploratory evaluations of a computer game supporting cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents. In CHI'11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Demo. 1992. The self-concept over time: Research issues and directions. Annual Review of Sociology 18, 1, 303--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. Dinos, et al. 2004. Stigma: the feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 184, 176--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. G. Doherty, D. Coyle, and J. Sharry. 2012. Engagement with online mental health interventions: An exploratory clinical study of a treatment for depression. In CHI'12. ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. G. Doherty, D. Coyle, and M. Matthews. 2010. Design and evaluation guidelines for mental health technologies. Interacting with Computers 22, 243--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. C. Dwyer, S. Hiltz, and K. Passerini. 2007. Trust and privacy concerns within social networking sites. In AMCIS'07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. K. A. Dyer and C. D. Thompson. 2000. Internet use for Web-education on the overlooked areas of grief and loss. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3, 2, 255--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. L. Festinger. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7, 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. B. Glaser and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. Gleeson, et al. 2009. A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for first-episode psychosis patients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 70, 4, 477--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. D. Goldberg and P. Aggett. 1998. On the engagement of psychotic adolescents and their families. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 3, 183--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. C. González-Blanch, et al. 2007. Cognitive dimensions in first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research 41, 11, 968--977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. C. Gonzalez-Blanch, et al. 2010. First-episode schizophrenia patients neuropsycholgically within the normal limits: Evidence of deterioration in speed of processing. Schizophrenia Research 1, 3, 18--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. J. Grudin. 1994. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM 37, 1, 92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. E. D. Hale, G. J. Treharne, and G. D. Kitas. 2007. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness: How can we use it to understand and respond to our patients' needs? Rheumatology 46, 904--906.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. P. L. Hall. 2003. The cognitive-behavioural treatment of low self-esteem in psychotic patients: A pilot study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 41, 3, 317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. A. Hartzler and W. Pratt. 2011. Managing the personal side of health: How patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13, 3, e62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. R. Hirschfeld. 2005. What do psychotic experiences mean for young men? A qualitative investigation. Psychology and Psychotherapy 78, 2, 249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. E. P. Holmes and L. P. River. 1998. Individual strategies for coping with the stigma of severe mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 5, 231--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. M. Johansen, et al. 2012. Electronic symptom reporting between patient and provider for improved health care service quality: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Part 1: State of the art. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14, 5, e118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. R. Kern, et al. 2009. Psychosocial treatments to promote functional recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35, 2, 347--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. C. Kwai Fun Ip and C. Wagner. 2008. Weblogging: A study of social computing and its impact on organizations. Decision Support Systems 45, 2, 242--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Y. M. Lai. 2001. Stigma of mental illness. Singapore Medical Journal 42, 3, 111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. L. Lee. 2005. Young people and the Internet: From theory to practice. Young 13, 4, 315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. A. Lenhart, S. Arafeh, and A. Smith. 2008. Writing, technology and teens. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Writing_Report_Final3.pdf.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. H. Leventhal, et al. 1992. Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Therapy and Research 16, 2, 143--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. D. Maloney-Krichmar and J. Preece. 2005. A multi-level analysis of sociability, usability and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 12, 2, 201--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. P. D. McGorry, et al. 2007. Clinical staging: A heuristic model for psychiatry and youth mental health. Medical Journal of Australia 187, 7, 40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. D. Millen and J. Patterson. 2002. Stimulating social engagement in a community network. In CSCW'02. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. P. K. H. Mo and N. Coulson. 2010. Empowering processes in online support groups among people living with HIV/AIDS: A comparative analysis of “lurkers” and “posters.” Computers in Human Behavior 26, 5, 1183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. D. Mohr, P. Cuijpers, and K. Lehman. 2011. Supportive accountability: A model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13, 1, e30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. R. E. Mullen and J. F. Donnermeyer. 1985. Age, trust, and perceived safety from crime in rural areas. Gerontologist 25, 3, 237--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. W. L. Neuman. 1997. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn & Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. M. Newman, et al. 2011. It's not that I don't have problems, I'm just not putting them on Facebook: Challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health. In CSCW'11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. J. Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In CHI'94. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. OWASP. 2012. The Open Web Application Security Project. Retrieved from http://www.webcitation.org/68qeWtLTy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. M. Parameswaran. 2007. Research issues in social computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 6, 336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. P. A. Pavlou. 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7, 3, 101. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. C. M. Ridings. 2002. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 3--4, 271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. SaneAustralia. 2011. People Living With Psychosis: A SANE Response. Retrieved from http://www.sane.org/sane-information/informationresearch/1042-people-living-with-psychosis-a-sane-response.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. M. Seligman and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 2000. Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist 55, 1, 5--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. P. Valkenburg. 2007. Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 4, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. H. Walker. 2006. Computer-based education for patients with psychosis. Nursing Standard 20, 30, 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. M. Webb, J. Burns, and P. Collin. 2008. Providing online support for young people with mental health difficulties: Challenges and opportunities explored. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 2, 2, 108--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. M. Wierzbicki and G. Pekarik. 1993. A meta-analysis of psychotherapy drop-out. Professional Psychotherapy: Research and Practice 24, 190--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. G. Wolf. 2010. The data-driven life. New York Times. April 28, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. J. Yurchisin, K. Watchravesringkan, and D. B. McCabe. 2005. An exploration of identity re-creation in the context of Internet dating. Social Behaviour and Personality 33, 8, 735--750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Moderated online social therapy: Designing and evaluating technology for mental health

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
        ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 21, Issue 1
        February 2014
        170 pages
        ISSN:1073-0516
        EISSN:1557-7325
        DOI:10.1145/2582013
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 February 2014
        • Accepted: 1 September 2013
        • Received: 1 May 2012
        Published in tochi Volume 21, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader