skip to main content
10.1145/2513383.2513435acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bypassing lists: accelerating screen-reader fact-finding with guided tours

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Navigating back and forth from a list of links (index) to its target pages is common on the web, but tethers screen-reader users to unnecessary cognitive and mechanical steps. This problem worsens when indexes lack information scent: cues that enable users to select a link with confidence during fact-finding. This paper investigates how blind users who navigate the web with screen-readers can bypass a scentless index with guided tours: a much simpler browsing pattern that linearly concatenates items of a collection. In a controlled study (N=11) at the Indiana School for the Blind and Visually Impaired (ISBVI), guided tours lowered user's cognitive effort and significantly decreased time-on-task and number of pages visited when compared to an index with poor information scent. Our findings suggest that designers can supplement indexes with guided tours to benefit screen-reader users in a variety of web navigation contexts.

References

  1. Bry, F., & Eckert, M. (2005). Processing link structures and link bases in the web's open world linking. Proc. Hypertext, 135--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176 (1), 101--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chi, Ed H. (2002). Scent of the Web. In: Julie Ratner (ed.), Human Factors and Web Development, 265--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Furuta, R., Shipman III, F. M., Marshall, C. C., Brenner, D., & Hsieh, H. W. (1997). Hypertext paths and the World-Wide Web: experiences with Walden's Paths. Proc. Hypertext, 167--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Garzotto, F., Mainetti, L., & Paolini, P. (1995). User interaction styles in museum hypermedia. Arc.&Museum Informatics, 217--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Garzotto, F., Paolini, P., Bolchini, D., & Valenti, S. (1999). Modeling-by-Patterns" of Web Applications. Workshop on the World Wide Web and conceptual modeling, 293--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Isakowitz, T., Stohr, E. A., & Balasubramanian, P. (1995). RMM: a methodology for structured hypermedia design. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 34--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jühne, J., Jensen, A. T., & Grøønbæk, K. (1998). Ariadne: a Java-based guided tour system for the World Wide Web. Computer networks and ISDN systems, 30(1), 131--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kahn, P. and Meyrowitz, N., Guide. (1988). Hypercard and Intermedia: A comparison of hypertext/hypermedia Systems. IRIS technical report, 88 (7).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kellar, M., Watters, C., & Shepherd, M. (2006). A Goal- based Classification of Web Information Tasks. Proc. ASIS&T, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kreutz, R., Euler, B., & Spitzer, K. (1999). No longer Lost in WWW-based Hyperspaces. Proc. ACM Hypertext, 133--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lemahieu, W. (2002). Context-based navigation in the Web by means of dynamically generated guided tours. Computer Networks, 39(3), 311--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Liegle, J. O., & Janicki, T. N. (2006). The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of Web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 885--898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Pirolli, P. L. T. (2007). Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information (Vol. 2). Oxford Univ. Press, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rohani Ghahari, R., Ferati, M., Yang, T., & Bolchini, D. (2012). Back navigation shortcuts for screen reader users. Proc.ASSETS, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sandvad, E. S., Grønbæk, K., Sloth, L., & Knudsen, J. L. (2001). A metro map metaphor for guided tours on the Web: the Webvise guided tour system. Proc. WWW, 326--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Seeberg, C., Reichenberger, K., Fischer, S., Steinmetz, R., & Steinacker, A. (1999). Dynamically generated tables of contents as guided tours in adaptive hypermedia systems. Proc. EdMedia, 640--645.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chi, H. C., Pirolli, P., Chen, K., Pitkow, J. (2001). Using Information Scent to Model User Information Needs and Actions on the Web. In Proc. CHI 2001, 490--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tauscher, L., & Greenberg, S. (1997). Revisitation patterns in world wide web navigation. Proc. CHI, 399--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Theofanos, M. F., & Redish, J. (2003). Guidelines for accessible and usable web sites: observing users who work with screen readers. Interactions, 10(6), 38--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Trigg, R. (1988). Guided tours and tabletops: tools for communicating in a hypertext environment. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 6 (4), 398--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Xu, H., Zhou, X., Ni, J., & Zhao, Z. (2000). Adaptability in KDAEHS: an adaptive educational hypermedia system based on structural computing. Proc. Hypertext, 250--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yang, T., Ferati, M., He, L., & Bolchini, D. (2012). Navigating by index and guided tour for fact finding. Proc. SIGDOC, 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yang, T., Ferati, M., Liu, Y., Rohani Ghahari, R., & Bolchini, D. (2012). Aural browsing on-the-go: listening-based back navigation in large web architectures. Proc. SIG CHI, 277--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yang, T., Linder, J., & Bolchini, D. (2012). DEEP: Design-Oriented Evaluation of Perceived Usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(5), 308--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Zellweger, P. T. (1989). Scripted documents: a hypermedia path mechanism. Proc. Hypertext, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bypassing lists: accelerating screen-reader fact-finding with guided tours

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ASSETS '13: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
          October 2013
          343 pages
          ISBN:9781450324052
          DOI:10.1145/2513383

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 October 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          ASSETS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate28of98submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader