skip to main content
10.1145/2525314.2525364acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Output-sensitive well-separated pair decompositions for dynamic point sets

Published:05 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The well-separated pair decomposition (WSPD) is a fundamental structure in computational geometry. Given a set P of n points in d-dimensional space and a positive separation parameter s, an s-WSPD is a concise representation of all the O(n2) pairs of P requiring only O(sdn) storage. The WSPD has numerous applications in spatial data processing, such as computing spanner graphs, minimum spanning trees, shortest-path oracles, and statistics on interpoint distances. We consider the problem of maintaining a WSPD when points are inserted to or deleted from P.

Worst-case arguments suggest that the addition or deletion of a single point could result in the generation (or removal) up to Ω(sd) pairs, which can be unacceptably high in many applications. Fortunately, the actual number of well separated pairs can be significantly smaller in practice, particularly when the points are well clustered. This suggests the importance of being able to respond to insertions and deletions in a manner that is output sensitive, that is, whose running time depends on the actual number of pairs that have been added or removed. We present the first output-sensitive algorithms for maintaining a WSPD of a point set under insertion and deletion. We show that our algorithms are nearly optimal, in the sense that these operations can be performed in time that is roughly equal to the number of changes to the WSPD.

References

  1. S. Arya and D. M. Mount. Approximate range searching. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl., 17:135--163, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. B. Callahan and S. R. Kosaraju. A decomposition of multidimensional point sets with applications to k-nearest-neighbors and n-body potential fields. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 42:67--90, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. K. L. Clarkson. Fast algorithms for the all nearest neighbors problem. In Proc. 24th Annu. IEEE Sympos. Found. Comput. Sci., pages 226--232, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Fischer and S. Har-Peled. Dynamic well-separated pair decomposition made easy. Proc. 17th Canad. Conf. Comput. Geom., pages 235--238, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. N. Frederickson. A data structure for dynamically maintaining rooted trees. Journal of Algorithms, 24:37--65, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Gao, L. Guibas, and A. Nguyen. Deformable spanners and applications. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl., 35(1):2--19, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L.-A. Gottlieb and L. Roditty. An optimal dynamic spanner for doubling metric spaces. In Proc. 16th Annu. European Sympos. Algorithms, volume 5193/2008, pages 478--489. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 73:325--348, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Har-Peled. Geometric Approximation Algorithms. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Har-Peled and M. Mendel. Fast construction of nets in low dimensional metrics and their applications. SIAM J. Comput., 35:1148--1184, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. M. Mount and E. Park. A dynamic data structure for approximate range searching. In Proc. 26th Annu. Sympos. Comput. Geom., pages 247--256, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Narasimhan and M. Smid. Geometric Spanner Networks. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. G. Narasimhan and M. Zachariasen. Geometric minimum spanning trees via well-separated pair decompositions. J. Exper. Algorithmics, 6, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L. Roditty. Fully dynamic geometric spanners. Algorithmica, 62:1073--1087, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Samet. Foundations of Multidimensional and Metric Data Structures. Morgan-Kaufmann, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Sankaranarayanan and H. Samet. Query processing using distance oracles for spatial networks. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engr., 22:1158--1175, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. D. Sleator and R. E. Tarjan. A data structure for dynamic trees. J. Comput. Sys. Sci., 26:362--391, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Smid. Closest point problems in computational geometry. In J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Handbook on Computational Geometry, pages 877--935. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Smid. The well-separated pair decomposition and its applications. In T. Gonzalez, editor, Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics, pages 53-1--53-12. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Output-sensitive well-separated pair decompositions for dynamic point sets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL'13: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2013
      598 pages
      ISBN:9781450325219
      DOI:10.1145/2525314

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 November 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader