skip to main content
10.1145/2533810.2533816acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quantitative comparison of indoor positioning on different densities of WiFi arrays in a single environment

Published:05 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Location Based Services (LBS), which are supported by ubiquitous location finding and positioning information, have become increasingly popular. These services are integrated with various wireless technologies (i.e. cellular, WiFi, and Bluetooth) on mobile devices that establish necessary location information. While each of these technologies contributes to the integration, development and success of LBSs, WiFi has been the most widely employed as an alternative to the Global Positioning System (GPS). Several commercial WiFi-based positioning systems (WPS) are available to the public to extend positioning coverage to places where GPS is unreliable or unavailable; however, these commercial WPSs often fail to deliver GPS-like positioning. The coarse positioning accuracy of commercial WPSs may be caused by unreliable or unsecured databases, which contain the essential WiFi-array information to produce local positioning. Knowing this, the quality of WiFi-based positioning services can be enhanced by improving the quality of a database with well-surveyed and accurate information. The Saskatchewan Enhanced positioning System (SaskEPS) is designed to reduce common errors in WPS. SaskEPS's positioning accuracy and consistency is supported by a thoroughly validated Access Point (AP) database. It has been tested in several buildings at the University of Saskatchewan and successfully provides GPS-like positioning accuracy. Our tests have also begun to elucidate the role of WiFi density in ensuring GPS-like positioning accuracy in indoor spaces. In this paper, we investigate the quantitative relationship between WiFi density and SaskEPS's overall positioning accuracy.

References

  1. Borriello, G., Chalmers, M., LaMarca, A. and Nixon, P. Delivering real-world ubiquitous location systems. Communication of the ACM, 48, 3 (2005), 36--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bell, S. and Saucier, D. Relationship among environmental pointing accuracy, mental rotation, sex, and hormones. Environment and Behavior, 36, 2 (March 2004), 251--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Raper, J., Gartner, G., Karimi, H. and Rizos, C. A critical evaluation of location based services and their potential. Journal of Location Based Services, 1, 1 (2007), 5--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Steiniger, S., Neun, M. and Edwardes, A. Foundations of location based services. University of Zurich, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargh, M. S. and Groote, R. d. Indoor Localization Based on Response Rate of Bluetooth Inquiries. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Mobile Entity Localization and Tracking in GPS-less Environments (San Francisco, CA, 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zandbergen, P. Accuracy of iPhone Locations: A Comparison of Assisted GPS, WiFi and Cellular Positioning. Transactions in GIS, 13, s1 (2009), 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kolodziej, K. W. and Hjelm, J. Local positioning systems: LBS applications and services. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fallah, N., Apostolopoulos, I., Bekris, K. and Folmer, E. Indoor Human Navigation Systems: A Survey. Interacting with Computers, 25, 1 (2013), 21--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Meng, X., Dodson, A., Moore, T. and Roberts, G. Towards Ubiquitous Positioning (UbiPos): A GNSS Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2007 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation (San Diego, CA, USA, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tippenhauer, N. O., Rasmussen, K. B., Popper, C. and Capkun, S. Attacks on public WLAN-based positioning systems. In Proceedings of the The ACM/Usenix International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services (Krakow, Poland, 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Soonjun, S., Promwong, S. and Cherntanomwong, P. Improvement of RFID based location fingerprint technique for indoor environment. In Proceedings of the The 9th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technology (Incheon, Korea, 28--30 Sept. 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. SkyhookWireless How It Works. www.skyhookwireless.com, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zandbergen, P. Comparison of WiFi positioning on two mobile devices. Journal of Location Based Services, 6, 1 (2011), 35--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P., Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. V., Hern, S. C. and Engelmann, W. H. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 11, 3 (2001), 231--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bell, S. and Jung, W. Mapping WLAN Coverage As A Potential Complementary Source for GPS-based Navigation in Indoor Environments. In Proceedings of the Canadian Geomatic Conference 2010 (Calgary, Alberta, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Shin, J., Jung, S. H., Yoon, G. and Han, D. A Multi-Classifier Approach for WiFi-Based Positioning System. Springer Netherlands, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Bahl, P. and Padmanabhan, V. RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of the The 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. (Tel Aviv, Israel, 2000).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Widyawan, Klepal, M. and Pesch, D. Influence of predicted and measured fingerprint on the accuracy of RSSI-based indoor location systems. In Proceedings of the The 4th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication (Hannover, Germany, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jung, W. R., Bell, S., Petrenko, A. and Sizo, A. Potential risks of WiFi-based indoor positioning and progress on improving localization functionality. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Fourth ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness (Redondo Beach, California, 2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Bell, S., Jung, W. R. and Krishnakumar, V. WiFi-based enhanced positioning systems: Accuracy through Mapping, Calibration, and Classification. In Proceedings of the ISA '10: 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness (San Jose, CA, USA, 2010, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lim, J.-S., Jang, W.-H., Yoon, G.-W. and Han, D.-S. Radio Map Update Automation for WiFi Positioning Systems. Communications Letters, IEEE, 17, 4 (2013), 693--696.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, B., Salter, J., Dempster, A. and Rizos, C. Indoor positioning techniques based on wireless LAN. In Proceedings of the The 1st IEEE International Conference on Wireless Boradband and Ultra Wideband Communication (Sydney, Australia, 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallagher, T., Li, B., Kealy, A. and Dempster, A. Trials of commercial Wi-Fi positioning systems for indoor and urban canyons. In Proceedings of the IGNSS 2009 Symposium on GPS/GNSS (Gold Coast, Australia, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemelson, H., Kjægaard, M., Hansen, R. and King, T. Error estimation for indoor 802.11 location fingerprinting. In Proceedings of the The 4th International Symposium on Location and Context Awareness (Tokyo, Japan, 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Li, B., Wang, Y., Lee, H. K., Dempster, A. and Rizos, C. Method for yielding a database of location fingerprints in WLAN. Communications, IEE Proceedings-, 152, 5 (2005), 580--586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Quantitative comparison of indoor positioning on different densities of WiFi arrays in a single environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISA '13: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness
        November 2013
        59 pages
        ISBN:9781450325264
        DOI:10.1145/2533810

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 November 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate5of7submissions,71%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader