skip to main content
10.1145/2534931.2534942acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interacting with multi-perspective views: challenges and approaches

Published:05 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses challenges and approaches of interaction and navigation techniques for multi-perspective views (MPVs) in the context of 3D geovirtual environments. In contrast to single-perspective views, MPVs seamlessly combine multiple views from different perspectives in one image to reduce occlusion and visual clutter while providing additional context information.

3D geovirtual environments often provide a single-perspective view and use interaction techniques that are based on ray-casting. The application of ray-cast based interaction techniques for MPVs introduces a number of technical challenges. We show how existing interaction techniques can be adapted for the application to multi-perspective city panoramas. Further, we introduce interaction techniques that enable a fast and directed exploration of virtual 3D building models based on multi-perspective detail+overview visualization.

References

  1. L. Bavoil, S. P. Callahan, A. Lefohn, J. a. L. D. Comba, and C. T. Silva. Multi-fragment effects on the gpu using the k-buffer. In Proceedings of the 2007 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games, I3D '07, pages 97--104, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Bavoil, M. Sainz, and R. Dimitrov. Image-space horizon-based ambient occlusion. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 talks, SIGGRAPH '08, pages 22:1--22:1, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Glander and J. Döllner. Abstract representations for interactive visualization of virtual 3d city models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(5):375--387, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. M. Hall, J. Collomosse, Y.-Z. Song, P. Shen, and C. Li. RTcams: A New Perspective on Nonphotorealistic Rendering from Photographs. IEEE Trans. Vis. Graph., 13(5):966--979, Sept. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Jobst and J. Döllner. Better Perception of 3D-Spatial Relations by Viewport Variations. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Visual Information Systems, VISUAL '08, pages 7--18, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Khan, B. Komalo, J. Stam, G. Fitzmaurice, and G. Kurtenbach. HoverCam: interactive 3D navigation for proximal object inspection. In Proc. I3D, pages 73--80. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. McCrae, I. Mordatch, M. Glueck, and A. Khan. Multiscale 3D navigation. In Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, I3D '09, pages 7--14. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Möser, P. Degener, R. Wahl, and R. Klein. Context Aware Terrain Visualization for Wayfinding and Navigation. Computer Graphics Forum, 27(7):1853--1860, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. Pasewaldt, A. Semmo, M. Trapp, and J. Döllner. Towards comprehensible digital 3d maps. In M. Jobst, editor, Service-Oriented Mapping 2012 (SOMAP2012), pages 261--276. Jobstmedia Management Verlag, Wien, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Pasewaldt, M. Trapp, and J. Döllner. Multiscale Visualization of 3D Geovirtual Environments Using View-Dependent Multi-Perspective Views. Journal of WSCG, 19(3):111--118, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Pasewaldt, M. Trapp, and J. Döllner. Multi-Perspective Detail+Overview Visualization for 3D Building Exploration. In W. T. Silvester Czanner, editor, Proceedings of 11th Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics 2013 Conference (TP.CG.2013), pages 57--64. The Eurographics Association, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Patterson. A View From on High: Heinrich Berann's Panoramas and Landscape Visualization Techniques For the US National Park Service. In Cartographic Perspectives, number 36, pages 38--65. NACIS, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. V. Popescu, P. Rosen, and N. Adamo-Villani. The graph camera. ACM Trans. Graph., 28(5):1, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Roth. Ray Casting for Modeling Solids. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 18(2):109--144, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. T. Saito and T. Takahashi. Comprehensible rendering of 3-D shapes. ACM SIGGRAPH'90, 24(4):197--206, Sept. 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Segal and K. Akeley. The OpenGL Graphics System: A Specification (Version 2.0 ). The Khronos Group Inc., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interacting with multi-perspective views: challenges and approaches

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MapInteract '13: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on MapInteraction
        November 2013
        97 pages
        ISBN:9781450325363
        DOI:10.1145/2534931

        Copyright © 2013 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 November 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MapInteract '13 Paper Acceptance Rate17of20submissions,85%Overall Acceptance Rate17of20submissions,85%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader