skip to main content
10.1145/2541016.2541025acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Curiosity to cupboard: self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time

Published:25 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses findings made during a study of energy use feedback in the home (eco-feedback), well after the novelty has worn off. Contributing towards four important knowledge gaps in the research, we explore eco-feedback over longer time scales, focusing on instances where the feedback was not of lasting benefit to users rather than when it was. Drawing from 23 semi-structured interviews with Australian householders, we found that an initially high level of engagement gave way over time to disinterest, neglect and in certain cases, technical malfunction. Additionally, preconceptions concerned with the "purpose" of the feedback were found to affect use. We propose expanding the scope of enquiry for eco-feedback in several ways, and describe how eco-feedback that better supports decision-making in the "maintenance phase", i.e. once the initial novelty has worn off, may be key to longer term engagement.

References

  1. Barua, D., Kay, J., Paris, C.: Viewing and controlling personal sensor data: What do users want? In Proc: PERSUASIVE 2013, Sydney, Australia (2013) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brynjarsdottir, H., Hakansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., and Sengers, P.: Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability, In Proc: CHI 2012, Austin, USA. (2012) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Darby, S. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing, and direct displays. (2006). Available at: http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/downloads/smart-metering-report.pdf. Accessed: 30/9/13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC): Smart meters: A guide (2013) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/smart-meters-how-they-work. Accessed 24/6/13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Erickson, T., Li, M., Kim, Y., Deshpande, A., Sahu, S., Chao, T., Sukaviriya, P., and Naphade, M.: The dubuque electricity portal: evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system. In Proc: CHI 2013, Paris, France (2013) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Faruqui, A., S. Sergici, and Sharif, A.: The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption-A survey of the experimental evidence. Energy 35 (4): 1598--1608 (2010)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1 (1): 79--104 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L and Landay, J.: The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc: CHI 2010, Atlanta, USA (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Ostergren, M., Ramanathan, S., Peterson, J., Wragg, I., Larson, Fu, F., Bai, M., Patel, S. H., and Landay J.: The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water use data. In: Proc: CHI 2012, Austin, USA, (2012) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fujinami, K., and Riekki, J.: A case study on an ambient display as a persuasive medium for exercise awareness. In H. Oinas-Kukkonen et al. (Eds): Persuasive 2008: San Diego, USA (2008) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Jacucci, G., Tusa, G., Mikkola, T., Zamboni, L., Hoggan E.: Tailoring feedback to users' actions in a persuasive game for household electricity consumption. In M. Bang and E. L Ragnemalm (Eds.): Persuasive 2012, Linköping, Sweden (2012) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Grønhøj, A, and J Thøgersen. Feedback on household electricity consumption: learning and social influence processes. International Journal of Consumer Studies 35 (2): 138--145 (2011)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., and Burgess, J.: Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 38 (10): 6111--6119 (2010)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., and Burgess, J.: Keeping energy visible: Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy 52: 126--134 (2013)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Karjalainen, S.: Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption. Energy and Buildings 43 (2--3): 458--467 (2011)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., Krcmar, H.: Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community based feedback in mobile and social media. In Proc: C&T 2011, Brisbane, Australia (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pierce, J., Fan, C., Lomas, D., Marcu, G., Paulos, E.: Some considerations on the (in)effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems. In Proc: DIS 2010, Aarhus, Denmark (2010) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Li, I., Dey, D. K., Forlizzi, J.: Understanding my data, myself: Supporting self-reflection with Ubicomp technologies. In Proc: UbiComp 2011, Beijing, China (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Local Government Infrastructure Services (LGIS: Climate Smart Home Service, Queensland Government, (2013). Available at: http://www.climatesmarthome.com/what-was.html. Accessed: 24/6/13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Riche, Y., Dodge, J., Metoyer, R., Studying always-on electricity feedback in the home. In Proc: CHI 2010, Atlanta, USA (2010) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Schwartz, T., Denef, S., Stevens, G., Ramirez, L., Wulf, V.: Cultivating energy literacy- Results from a longitudinal living lab study of a home energy management system. In Proc: CHI 2013, Paris, France (2013) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Snow, S., and Brereton, M.: Beyond demand management: The value of sharing electricity information. In Proc: 26th British Computer Society HCI Conference, Birmingham, UK (2012) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Snow, S., and Brereton, M.: Towards engaged consumption: new sources of inspiration for eco-feedback design. Proc: Interact 2013: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8120, pp. 117--124. (2013)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Strengers, Y. Beyond demand management: co-managing energy and water practices with Australian households. Policy Studies 32 (1): 35--58. (2011)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tolmie, P., and Crabtree, A. Deploying research technology in the home. In Proc: Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2008, San Diego, USA (2008) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. van Dam, S., Bakker, C. A., and van Hal, J. D. M.: Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term, Building Research & Information, 38: 458--469 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wallenborn, G., M. Orsini, and J. Vanhaverbeke.: Household appropriation of electricity monitors. International Journal of Consumer Studies 35 (2): 146--152, (2011)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Curiosity to cupboard: self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration
      November 2013
      549 pages
      ISBN:9781450325257
      DOI:10.1145/2541016

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate34of70submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader