skip to main content
10.1145/2557500.2557540acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Time-offset interaction with a holocaust survivor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Time-offset interaction is a new technology that allows for two-way communication with a person who is not available for conversation in real time: a large set of statements are prepared in advance, and users access these statements through natural conversation that mimics face-to-face interaction. Conversational reactions to user questions are retrieved through a statistical classifier, using technology that is similar to previous interactive systems with synthetic characters; however, all of the retrieved utterances are genuine statements by a real person. Recordings of answers, listening and idle behaviors, and blending techniques are used to create a persistent visual image of the person throughout the interaction. A proof-of-concept has been implemented using the likeness of Pinchas Gutter, a Holocaust survivor, enabling short conversations about his family, his religious views, and resistance. This proof-of-concept has been shown to dozens of people, from school children to Holocaust scholars, with many commenting on the impact of the experience and potential for this kind of interface.

References

  1. Chabert, C.-F., Einarsson, P., Jones, A., Lamond, B., Ma, A., Sylwan, S., Hawkins, T., and Debevec, P. Relighting human locomotion with fiowed refiectance fields. In SIGGRAPH 06: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Sketches, ACM (2006), 76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Clarkson, P., and Rosenfeld, R. Statistical language modeling using the Carnegie Mellon University-Cambridge toolkit. In Proc. of Eurospeech (Rhodes, Greece, 1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ghosh, A., Fyffe, G., Tunwattanapong, B., Busch, J., Yu, X., and Debevec, P. Multiview face capture using polarized spherical gradient illumination. In Proceedings of the 2011 SIGGRAPH Asia Conference, SA '11, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 129:1--129:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gratch, J., Rickel, J., Andre, E., Cassell, J., Petajan, E., and Badler, N. Creating interactive virtual humans: Some assembly required. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2002), 54--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hartholt, A., Traum, D., Marsella, S. C., Shapiro, A., Stratou, G., Leuski, A., Morency, L.-P., and Gratch, J. All together now: Introducing the virtual human toolkit. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Humans (Edinburgh, UK, Aug. 2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Leuski, A., and Traum, D. Practical language processing for virtual humans. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-10) (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Maio, H., Traum, D., and Debevec, P. New dimensions in testimony. PastForward, Summer (2012), 22--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Morbini, F., Audhkhasi, K., Sagae, K., Artstein, R., Can, D., Georgiou, P., Narayanan, S., Leuski, A., and Traum, D. Which ASR should I choose for my dialogue systemfi In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2013 Conference (Metz, France, August 2013), 394--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Robinson, S., Traum, D., Ittycheriah, M., and Henderer, J. What would you ask a conversational agentfi Observations of human-agent dialogues in a museum setting. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (Marrakech, Morocco, 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Traum, D., Aggarwal, P., Artstein, R., Foutz, S., Gerten, J., Katsamanis, A., Leuski, A., Noren, D., and Swartout, W. Ada and Grace: Direct interaction with museum visitors. In Intelligent Virtual Agents: 12th International Conference, IVA 2012, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, September 12fi14, 2012 Proceedings, Y. Nakano, M. Neff, A. Paiva, and M. Walker, Eds., vol. 7502 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer (Heidelberg, September 2012), 245--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Vertanen, K. Baseline WSJ acoustic models for HTK and Sphinx: Training recipes and recognition experiments. Tech. rep., Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Weide, R. The Carnegie Mellon University pronouncing dictionary, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Time-offset interaction with a holocaust survivor

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            IUI '14: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
            February 2014
            386 pages
            ISBN:9781450321846
            DOI:10.1145/2557500

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 February 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            IUI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate46of191submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader