skip to main content
10.1145/2591062.2594395acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Analyzing software data: after the gold rush (a goldfish-bowl panel)

Published:31 May 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the past few years, the volume and types of data related to software engineering has grown at an unprecedented rate and shows no sign of slowing. This turn of events has led to a veritable gold rush, as researchers attempt to mine raw data and extract nuggets of insight. A very real danger is that the landscape may become a Wild West where inexperienced software "cowboys" sell hastily generated models to unsophisticated business users, without any concern for best or safe practices. Given the current enthusiasm for data analysis in software engineering, it is time to review how we using those techniques and can we use them better. While there may be no single best "right" way to analyze software data, there are many wrong ways. As data techniques mature, we need to move to a new era where data scientists understand and share the strengths and drawbacks of the many methods that might be deployed in industry. In this highly interactive panel skilled practitioners and academics can (a) broadcast their insights and (b) hear the issues of newcomers in this field.

References

  1. Christian Bird, Nachiappan Nagappan, Premkumar Devanbu, Harald Gall, and Brendan Murphy. Does distributed development affect software quality? An empirical case study of Windows Vista. In Proc. of the 31st Intl. Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '09), pp. 518-528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Thomas J. Ostrand, Elaine J. Weyuker, and Robert M. Bell. 2004. Where the bugs are. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA '04), pp. 86-96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ayse Tosun Misirli, Ayse Bener, and Resat Kale. AI-Based Software Defect Predictors: Applications and Benefits in a Case Study. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI-10), pp. 1748-1755Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tim Menzies, Zach Milton, Burak Turhan, Bojan Cukic, Yue Jiang, and Ayşe Bener. Defect prediction from static code features: current results, limitations, new approaches. In Automated Software Engineering, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 375-407. December 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing software data: after the gold rush (a goldfish-bowl panel)

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICSE Companion 2014: Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering
          May 2014
          741 pages
          ISBN:9781450327688
          DOI:10.1145/2591062

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 May 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate276of1,856submissions,15%

          Upcoming Conference

          ICSE 2025

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader