skip to main content
10.1145/2593069.2593102acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CACI: Dynamic Current Analysis Towards Robust Recycled Chip Identification

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Rising incidences of counterfeit chips in the supply chain have posed a serious threat to the semiconductor industry. Recycling of used chips constitutes a major form of counterfeiting attacks. If undetected, they can lead to serious consequences including system performance/reliability issues during field operation and potential revenue/reputation loss for a trusted manufacturer. Existing validation approaches based on path delay analysis suffer from reduced robustness and sensitivity under large process variations. On the other hand, existing design solutions based on aging sensors require additional design/verification efforts and cannot be applied to legacy chips. In this paper, we present a novel recycled chip identification approach, CACI, that exploits differential aging in self-similar modules (e.g., different parts of an adder) to isolate aged chips under large inter- and intra-die process variations. It compares dynamic current (IDDT) signatures between two adjacent similar circuit structures in a chip. We derive an isolation metric based on multiple current comparisons to provide high level of confidence. CACI does not rely on any embedded structures for authentication, thus it comes at virtually zero design overhead and can be applied to chips already in the market. Through extensive simulations, we show that for 15% inter- and 10% intra-die variations in threshold voltage for a 45nm CMOS process, over 97% of recycled chips can be reliably identified.

References

  1. U. Guin, et al., "Counterfeit IC detection and challenges ahead," ACM SIGDA, March 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Koushanfar, et al., "Can EDA Combat the Rise of Electronic Counterfeiting?" DAC, 2012, pp. 133--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. W. Kessler and T. Sharpe, "Faked Parts Detection," http://www.circuitsassembly.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Integra Technologies Inc., http://www.integra-tech.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ABI Electronic Inc., http://www.abielectronics.co.uk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Alkabani and F. Koushanfar, "Active Hardware Metering for Intellectual Property Protection and Security," USENIX Security, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. X. Zhang, N. Tuzzio and M. Tehranipoor "Identification of recovered ICs using fingerprints from a light-weight on-chip sensor," DAC, 2012, pp. 703--708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. E. Suh and S. Devadas, "Physical Unclonable Functions for Device Authentication and Secret Key Generation," DAC, 2007, pp. 9--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. X. Zhang, K. Xiao, and M. Tehranipoor, "Path-delay fingerprinting for identification of recovered ICs," DFT, 2012, pp. 13--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Moudgil, et al., "A novel statistical and circuit-based technique for counterfeit detection in existing ICs," GLSVLSI, 2013, pp. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Brooks and M. Martonosi, "Dynamically exploiting narrow width operands to improve processor power and performance,", HPCA, 1999, pp. 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Synopsys, HSPICE user guide: simulation and analysis, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Narasimhan, et al., "Multiple-parameter side-channel analysis: a non-invasive hardware Trojan dectection approach," HOST, 2010, pp. 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Rossi, et al., "A low power ultra-fast current transient measurement device," Sandia Report, Sand2004-5101, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Goldstein, et al., "CMOS low current measurement system for biomedical applications," IEEE Bio-CAS, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 111--119, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Predictive Technology Model, http://ptm.asu.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. CACI: Dynamic Current Analysis Towards Robust Recycled Chip Identification

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DAC '14: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Design Automation Conference
        June 2014
        1249 pages
        ISBN:9781450327305
        DOI:10.1145/2593069

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 June 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader