skip to main content
10.1145/2598394.2605690acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

Scripting and framework integration in heuristic optimization environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Rapid prototyping and testing of new ideas has been a major argument for evolutionary computation frameworks. These frameworks facilitate the application of evolutionary computation and allow experimenting with new and modified algorithms and problems by building on existing, well tested code. However, one could argue, that despite the many frameworks of the metaheuristics community, software packages such as MATLAB, GNU Octave, Scilab, or RStudio are quite popular. These software packages however are associated more closely with numerical analysis rather than evolutionary computation. In contrast to typical evolutionary computation frameworks which provide standard implementations of algorithms and problems, these popular frameworks provide a direct programming environment for the user and several helpful functions and mathematical operations. The user does not need to use traditional development tools such as a compiler or linker, but can implement, execute, and visualize his ideas directly within the environment. HeuristicLab has become a popular environment for heuristic optimization over the years, but has not been recognized as a programming environment so far. In this article we will describe new scripting capabilities created in HeuristicLab and give information on technical details of the implementation. Additionally, we show how the programming interface can be used to integrate further metaheuristic optimization frameworks in HeuristicLab. Categories and Subject D.

References

  1. A. Beham, E. Pitzer, S. Wagner, M. Affenzeller, K. Altendorfer, T. Felberbauer, and M. Bäck. Integration of flexible interfaces in optimization software frameworks for simulation-based optimization. In Companion Publication of the 2012 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO'12 Companion, pages 125--132, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 6(2):182--197, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Dobslaw. Input: The intelligent parameter utilization tool. In Companion Publication of the 2012 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO'12 Companion, pages 149--156, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. J. Durillo and A. J. Nebro. jMetal: A java framework for multi-objective optimization. Advances in Engineering Software, 42:760--771, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F.-A. Fortin, F.-M. De Rainville, M.-A. Gardner, M. Parizeau, and C. Gagné. DEAP: Evolutionary algorithms made easy. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13:2171--2175, jul 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Knowles and D. Corne. The pareto archived evolution strategy: A new baseline algorithm for pareto multiobjective optimisation. In Evolutionary Computation, 1999. CEC 99. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on, volume 1. IEEE, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. J. Nebro, F. Luna, E. Alba, B. Dorronsoro, J. J. Durillo, and A. Beham. Abyss: Adapting scatter search to multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 12(4):439--457, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. A. Parejo, A. Ruiz-Cortés, S. Lozano, and P. Fernandez. Metaheuristic optimization frameworks: a survey and benchmarking. Soft Computing, 16(3):527--561, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Voß and D. L. Woodruff. Optimization software class libraries. Springer, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Wagner. Heuristic Optimization Software Systems - Modeling of Heuristic Optimization Algorithms in the HeuristicLab Software Environment. PhD thesis, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Wagner, G. Kronberger, A. Beham, M. Kommenda, A. Scheibenpflug, E. Pitzer, S. Vonolfen, M. Kofler, S. Winkler, V. Dorfer, and M. Affenzeller. Advanced Methods and Applications in Computational Intelligence, volume 6 of Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, chapter Architecture and Design of the HeuristicLab Optimization Environment, pages 197--261. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization. In K. Giannakoglou et al., editors, Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control with Application to Industrial Problems (EUROGEN 2001), pages 95--100. International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scripting and framework integration in heuristic optimization environments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO Comp '14: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
      July 2014
      1524 pages
      ISBN:9781450328814
      DOI:10.1145/2598394

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 July 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • technical-note

      Acceptance Rates

      GECCO Comp '14 Paper Acceptance Rate180of544submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader