skip to main content
10.1145/2598784.2602773acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Interactions in the mouth: the voicemint electronic voice prosthesis

Published:21 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present the VoiceMint. A device that resides in the cheek of the mouth like a candy and restores the voice of (temporarily) voiceless patients. Current voice prostheses and restoration techniques are un-intuitive and sound unpleasant and robot-like. Electronic voice prostheses in the mouth have been tried in the past, yet only recently it has become technologically feasible to integrate all electronics into a single independent device, delivering a new, surrounding aware, interaction. A new breed of intimate symbiotic devices: independent, self-contained. We present the VoiceMint in a stage where we are just starting to explore the technology: electronics, intelligibility and intuitive control. The VoiceMint aims to help patients, previously hampered in their communication, regain their natural and intuitive voice. At the same time the technology may open up the niche of more, intimate symbionts.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Karim-Kos, H.E., E. de Vries, et al. A combined approach of incidence, survival and mortality for 17 cancer sites since the 1990s. Eur J Cancer 10, no. 44 (2008), 1345--1389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Liu, H., and L.Ng. Manwa. Electrolarynx in voice rehabilitation. Auris Nasus Larynx, no. 34 (2007), 327--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Roy N, Merrill RM, et al. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 47, 2 (2004), 281--293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Webwhispers.org. Webwhispers (1999). http://www.webwhispers.org/news/dec99.htm (accessed 2014, 03).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. van der Houwen EB. Voice Prosthesis. Pending patent: PCT/NL2012/050074 (2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Everett RL, Bailey BJ, An implantable electrolaryngeal prosthesis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 26 (1980), 418--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Painter C, Kaiser T, et al. Human speech development for an implantable artificial larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 96, 5 (1987), 573--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Takahashi, H., and M. Nakao. A voice-generation system using an intramouth vibrator. Journal of Artificial Organs 4, no. 4 (2001), 288--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. UltraVoice, Inc. UltraVoice electronic voice prosthesis. 2007. www.ultravoiceplus.com (accessed 2014, 20--2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Baraff, D.R. Artificial larynx. U.S. CA Patent 5,326,349. (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Indiana University School of Medicine. (2007). http://www.speech-languagetherapy.com/pdf/qs2007.pdf (accessed 2014, 24--3)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interactions in the mouth: the voicemint electronic voice prosthesis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DIS Companion '14: Proceedings of the 2014 companion publication on Designing interactive systems
          June 2014
          248 pages
          ISBN:9781450329033
          DOI:10.1145/2598784

          Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2014

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          DIS Companion '14 Paper Acceptance Rate107of402submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

          Upcoming Conference

          DIS '24
          Designing Interactive Systems Conference
          July 1 - 5, 2024
          IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader