skip to main content
10.1145/2600428.2600738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

SIGIR 2014 workshop on semantic matching in information retrieval

Published:03 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, significant progress has been made in research on what we call semantic matching (SM), in web search, question answering, online advertisement, cross-language information retrieval, and other tasks. Advanced technologies based on machine learning have been developed. Let us take Web search as example of the problem that also pervades the other tasks. When comparing the textual content of query and documents, Web search still heavily relies on the term-based approach, where the relevance scores between queries and documents are calculated on the basis of the degree of matching between query terms and document terms. This simple approach works rather well in practice, partly because there are many other signals in web search (hypertext, user logs, etc.) that complement it. However, when considering the long tail of web searches, it can suffer from data sparseness, e.g., Trenton does not match New Jersey Capital. Query document mismatches occur when searcher and author use different terms (representations), and this phenomenon is prevalent due to the nature of human language.

References

  1. E. Amigó, J. C. de Albornoz, I. Chugur, A. Corujo, J. Gonzalo, T. Martín, E. Meij, M. de Rijke, and D. Spina. Overview of replab 2013: Evaluating online reputation monitoring systems. In Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization, pages 333--352. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Diab, T. Baldwin, and M. Baroni, editors. Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Moschitti, S. Quarteroni, R. Basili, and S. Manandhar. Exploiting syntactic and shallow semantic kernels for question answer classification. In ACL-07, pages 776--783, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Wu, Z. Lu, and H. Li. Learning bilinear model for matching queries and documents. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 14(1):2519--2548, Jan. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SIGIR 2014 workshop on semantic matching in information retrieval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval
      July 2014
      1330 pages
      ISBN:9781450322577
      DOI:10.1145/2600428

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 July 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • technical-note

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate82of387submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader