skip to main content
10.1145/2611040.2611072acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing DL-Lite^{N}_{horn|bool} Finite Models with Frequency Constraints

Published:02 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we study the relationship that exists among the problems of finite concept satisfiability for TBoxes expressed in DL-Lite^{N}_{horn} and DL-Lite^{N}_{bool} description logics and the existence of a non-empty database that satisfies a set of given itemset frequency constraints, for the case where concepts are regarded as items. We show that, given a target concept defined through a DL-Lite^{N}_{bool} TBox, there exists a set of frequency constraints on boolean combinations of the concepts occurring in the TBox such that the target concept has a non-empty finite extension if and only if there exists a non-empty database which satisfies the constraints. As a consequence, the concept finite satisfiability problem is NP-complete for both logics. Furthermore, augmenting DL-Lite^{N}_{horn} and DL-Lite^{N}_{bool} TBoxes with frequency constraints on concept occurrence does not increase the complexity of the problems.

References

  1. A. Artale, D. Calvanese, R. Kontchakov, and M. Zakharyaschev. DL-Lite in the Light of First-Order Logic. In 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI Proceedings, pages 361--366, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Artale, D. Calvanese, R. Kontchakov, and M. Zakharyaschev. The DL-Lite Family and Relations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 36:1--69, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Baader and F. Distel. A Finite Basis for the Set of εL-Implications Holding in a Finite Model. In ICFCA 2008, International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, pages 46--61, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Baader and F. Distel. Exploring Finite Models in the Description Logic εL. In ICFCA 2009, International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, pages 146--161, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Balaban and A. Maraee. A UML-Based Method for Deciding Finite Satisfiability in Description Logics. In International Workshop on Description Logics, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. L. T. C. Lutz, U. Sattler. The complexity of finite model reasoning in description logics. Information and Computation, 199(1-2):132--171, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Cadoli, D. Calvanese, and G. D. Giacomo. Towards implementing finite model reasoning in description logics. In International Workshop on Description Logics, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Cadoli, D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, and T. Mancini. Finite Model Reasoning on UML Class Diagrams Via Constraint Programming. In AI*IA 2007, pages 36--47, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Calders. Axiomatization and Deduction Rules for the Frequency of Itemsets. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp, Dept. Mathematics and Computer Science, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. Calders. The complexity of satisfying constraints on databases of transactions. Acta Informatica, 44(7-8):591--624, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Calders. Itemset frequency satisfiability: Complexity and axiomatization. Theoretical Computer Science, 394(1-2):84--111, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Calders and B. Goethals. Non-derivable itemset mining. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 14(1):171--206, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Calvanese. Finite model reasoning in description logics. In International Workshop on Description Logics, pages 25--36, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Tractable Reasoning and Efficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The DL-Lite Family. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 39(3):385--429, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Ibañez-García. Finite Model Reasoning in DL-Lite with Cardinality Constraints. In International Workshop on Description Logics, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. L. Balcázar. Deduction schemes for association rules. In Eleven International Conference on Discovery Science, volume LNCS 5255, pages 124--135. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Kontchakov, F. Wolter, and F. Zakharyaschev. Logic-based ontology comparison and module extraction, with an application to DL-Lite. Artificial Intelligence, 174(15):1093--1141, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Lenzerini and P. Nobili. On the satisfiability of dependency constraints in entity-relationship schemata. Information Systems, 15(4):453--461, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Maraee and M. Balaban. Efficient Reasoning About Finite Satisfiability of UML Class Diagrams with Constrained Generalization Sets. In Model Driven Architecture-Foundations and Applications Third European ECMDA-FA Conference Procedings, volume LNCS 4530, pages 17--31. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Minuto Espil. Tractable reasoning problems with fully-characterized association rules. In Advances in Databases and Information Systems, ADBIS 2012, volume LNCS 7503, pages 282--295. Springer, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. N. Pasquier, Y. Bastide, R. Taouil, and L. Lakhal. Efficient mining of association rules using closed itemset lattices. Information Systems, 24(1):25--46, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. N. Pasquier, R. Taouil, Y. Bastide, G. Stumme, and L. Lakhal. Generating a condensed representation for association rules. Journal on Intelligent Information Systems, 24(1):29--60, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Queralt, A. Artale, D. Calvanese, and E. Teniente. OCL-Lite: Finite reasoning on UML/OCL conceptual schemas. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 73:1--22, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R. Rosati. Finite Model Reasoning in DL-Lite. In 5th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC Proceedings, volume LNCS 5021, pages 215--229. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. K. Schild. A correspondence theory for terminological logics: Preliminary report. In IJCAI'91, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 466--471. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Thalheim. Fundamentals of cardinality constraints. In 11th International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach, volume LNCS 645, pages 7--23. Springer, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing DL-Lite^{N}_{horn|bool} Finite Models with Frequency Constraints

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WIMS '14: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS14)
            June 2014
            506 pages
            ISBN:9781450325387
            DOI:10.1145/2611040

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 June 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            WIMS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate41of90submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate140of278submissions,50%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader