skip to main content
10.1145/2615569.2615689acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Country-level spatial dynamics of user activity: a case study in location-based social networks

Published:23 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Identifying and understanding the emerging patterns in user activity is an important step in designing and developing features for online social networks. With the explosive growth of user-generated data in such networks, the recorded user activities are no more sparse snapshots but are close to a live reflection of real life. This allows us to extract patterns which are tied to the time and space context of real life activity from such recorded data. In this work, we analyze two rich datasets obtained from two major location-based social networks (Foursquare and Gowalla) and show how users change their activity patterns depending on the country they currently reside on. We also compare activity patterns between foreign users from different countries and local users. The detailed results may not automatically generalize but this kind of analysis can be repeated on different datasets and the outcomes of such analyses can benefit social and behavioral scientists as well as designers of online social media.

References

  1. L. Backstrom, E. Sun, and C. Marlow. Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity. In Proceedings of the 19th WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, K. Lee, and D. Sui. Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services. In Proceedings of AAAI ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Cho, S. A. Myers, and J. Leskovec. Friendship and mobility: Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of ACM KDD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Cramer, M. Rost, and L. E. Holmquist. Performing a check-in: Emerging practices, norms and conflicts in location-sharing using foursquare. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI, pages 57--66, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Crandall, L. Backstrom, D. Cosley, S. Suri, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52):22436--22441, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Cranshaw, E. Toch, J. Hong, A. Kittur, and N. Sadeh. Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. In Proceedings of UbiComp, pages 119--128. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Efele. Timezones. http://efele.net/maps/tz/world/, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. M. Emran and N. Ye. Robustness of canberra metric in computer intrusion detection. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on Information Assurance and Security, West Point, NY, USA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Field. The college student market segment: A comparative study of travel behaviors of international and domestic students at a southeastern university. Journal of Travel Research, 37(4):375--381, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Foursquare-About. Foursquare's Indonesia problem. http://aboutfoursquare.com/ foursquare-indonesia/, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. J. Frey and D. Dueck. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315(5814):972--976, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. Garcia-Gavilanes, D. Quercia, and A. Jaimes. Cultural dimensions in twitter: Time, individualism and power. In Proceedings of AAAI ICWSM, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Kaltenbrunner, S. Scellato, Y. Volkovich, D. Laniado, D. Currie, E. Jutemar, and C. Mascolo. Far from the eyes, close on the web: impact of geographic distance on online social interactions. In Proceedings of ACM WOSN, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Kokare, B. N. Chatterji, and P. Biswas. Comparison of similarity metrics for texture image retrieval. In Proceedings of TENCON, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. Lambiotte, V. Blondel, C. De Kerchove, E. Huens, C. Prieur, Z. Smoreda, and P. Van Dooren. Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387(21):5317, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Lindqvist, J. Cranshaw, J. Wiese, J. Hong, and J. Zimmerman. I'm the mayor of my house: examining why people use foursquare - a social-driven location sharing application. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI, pages 2409--2418, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Mok, B. Wellman, and J. Carrasco. Does distance matter in the age of the internet? Urban Studies, 47(13):2747, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, C. Mascolo, and M. Pontil. An empirical study of geographic user activity patterns in foursquare. In Proceedings of AAAI ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Preotiuc-Pietro and T. Cohn. Mining user behaviours: A study of check-in patterns in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of ACM WebSci, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Scellato, C. Mascolo, M. Musolesi, and V. Latora. Distance matters: Geo-social metrics for online social networks. In Proceedings of WOSN, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Scellato, A. Noulas, R. Lambiotte, and C. Mascolo. Socio-spatial properties of online location-based social networks. In Proceedings of AAAI ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. L. Sproull and S. Kiesler. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. In Management Science, Volume 31, Issue 11, November, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Sullivan. It's easier to be yourself when you are invisible: Female college students discuss their online classroom experiences. Innovative Higher Education, 27(2):129--144, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Thematicmapping. Worldmap. http://thematicmapping. org/downloads/world\_borders.php, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. C. L. Toma, J. T. Hancock, and N. B. Ellison. Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8):1023--1036, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Country-level spatial dynamics of user activity: a case study in location-based social networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebSci '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science
      June 2014
      318 pages
      ISBN:9781450326223
      DOI:10.1145/2615569

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WebSci '14 Paper Acceptance Rate29of144submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      Websci '24
      16th ACM Web Science Conference
      May 21 - 24, 2024
      Stuttgart , Germany

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader