skip to main content
10.1145/2628257.2628275acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Re-evaluating benefits of body-based rotational cues for maintaining orientation in virtual environments: men benefit from real rotations, women don't

Published:08 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Relying exclusively on visual information to maintain orientation while traveling in virtual environments is challenging. However, it is currently unclear how much body-based information is required to produce a significant improvement in navigation performance. In our study participants explored unfamiliar virtual mazes using visual-only and physical rotations. Participants's ability to remain oriented was measured using a novel pointing task. While men consistently benefitted from using physical rotations versus visual-only rotations (lower absolute pointing errors, configuration errors, and absolute ego-orientation errors), women did not. We discuss design implications for locomotion interfaces in virtual environments. Our findings also suggest that investigating individual differences may help to resolve apparent conflicts in the literature regarding potential benefits of physical rotational cues for effective spatial orientation.

References

  1. Avraamides, M. N., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., and Golledge, R. G. 2004. Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science 15, 6, 403--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Batschelet, E. 1981. Circular Statistics in Biology. Mathematics in Biology. Academic Press Inc., London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Czerwinski, M., Tan, D. S., and Robertson, G. G. 2002. Women take a wider view. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'02, 195--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kelly, J. W., McNamara, T. P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T. H., and Rieser, J. J. 2008. The shape of human navigation: How environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation. Cognition 109, 2, 281--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lambery, S., and Berthoz, A. 2007. Gender differences in the use of external landmarks versus spatial representations updated by self-motion. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 06, 03, 379--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lawton, C., and Morrin, K. A. 1999. Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3d mazes. Sex Roles 40, 1--2, 73--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Riecke, B. E., Bodenheimer, B., McNamara, T. P., Williams, B., Peng, P., and Feuereissen, D. 2010. Do we need to walk for effective virtual reality navigation? Physical rotations alone may suffice. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spatial Cognition, SC'10. Springer-Verlag, 234--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ruddle, R. A., and Lessels, S. 2009. The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 16, 1, 5:1--5:18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ruddle, R. A., Volkova, E., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2011. Walking improves your cognitive map in environments that are large-scale and large in extent. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 2, 10:1--10:20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ruddle, R. A. 2013. The effect of translational and rotational body-based information on navigation. In Human Walking in Virtual Environments: Perception, Technology, and Applications, F. Steinicke, Y. Visell, J. Campos, and A. Lecuyer, Eds. Springer New York, 99--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Suma, E., Finkelstein, S., Reid, M., Babu, S., Ulinski, A., and Hodges, L. 2010. Evaluation of the cognitive effects of travel technique in complex real and virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 4, 690--702. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Tlauka, M., Brolese, A., Pomeroy, D., and Hobbs, W. 2005. Gender differences in spatial knowledge acquired through simulated exploration of a virtual shopping centre. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, 1, 111--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Waller, D. 2000. Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6, 4, 307--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Re-evaluating benefits of body-based rotational cues for maintaining orientation in virtual environments: men benefit from real rotations, women don't

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SAP '14: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
              August 2014
              137 pages
              ISBN:9781450330091
              DOI:10.1145/2628257

              Copyright © 2014 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 August 2014

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate43of94submissions,46%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader