skip to main content
10.1145/2628588.2628589acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesweb3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SRC - a streamable format for generalized web-based 3D data transmission

Published:08 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

A problem that still remains with today's technologies for 3D asset transmission is the lack of progressive streaming of all relevant mesh and texture data, with a minimal number of HTTP requests. Existing solutions, like glTF or X3DOM's geometry formats, either send all data within a single batch, or they introduce an unnecessary large number of requests. Furthermore, there is still no established format for a joined, interleaved transmission of geometry data and texture data.

Within this paper, we propose a new container file format, entitled Shape Resource Container (SRC). Our format is optimized for progressive, Web-based transmission of 3D mesh data with a minimum number of HTTP requests. It is highly configurable, and more powerful and flexible than previous formats, as it enables a truly progressive transmission of geometry data, partial sharing of geometry between meshes, direct GPU uploads, and an interleaved transmission of geometry and texture data. We also demonstrate how our new mesh format, as well as a wide range of other mesh formats, can be conveniently embedded in X3D scenes, using a new, mini-malistic X3D ExternalGeometry node.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Arnaud, R., and Barnes, M. C. 2006. Collada: Sailing the Gulf of 3D Digital Content Creation. AK Peters Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Behr, J., Eschler, P., Jung, Y., and Zöllner, M. 2009. X3DOM: a DOM-based HTML5/X3D integration model. In Proc. Web3D, 127--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Behr, J., Jung, Y., Franke, T., and Sturm, T. 2012. Using images and explicit binary container for efficient and incremental delivery of declarative 3D scenes on the web. In Proc. Web3D, 17--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Berndt, R., Fellner, D. W., and Havemann, S. 2005. Generative 3d models: A key to more information within less bandwidth at higher quality. In Proc. Web3D, ACM, New York, NY, USA, Web3D '05, 111--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chun, W. 2012. WebGL models: End-to-end. In OpenGL Insights, P. Cozzi and C. Riccio, Eds. CRC Press, July, 431--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fogel, E., Cohen-Or, D., Ironi, R., and Zvi, T. 2001. A web architecture for progressive delivery of 3D content. In Proc. Web3D, 35--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hoppe, H. 1996. Progressive meshes. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Isenburg, M., and Lindstrom, P. 2005. Streaming meshes. In Proc. VIS, 231--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jankowski, J., Ressler, S., Sons, K., Jung, Y., Behr, J., and Slusallek, P. 2013. Declarative integration of interactive 3d graphics into the world-wide web: Principles, current approaches, and research agenda. In Proc. Web3D, ACM, New York, NY, USA, Web3D '13, 39--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Klein, F., Sons, K., John, S., Rubinstein, D., Slusallek, P., and Byelozyorov, S. 2012. Xflow: Declarative data processing for the web. In Proc. Web3D, ACM, New York, NY, USA, Web3D '12, 37--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lavoué, G., Chevalier, L., and Dupont, F. 2013. Streaming compressed 3d data on the web using javascript and webgl. In Proc. Web3D, ACM, New York, NY, USA, Web3D '13, 19--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lee, J., Choe, S., and Lee, S. 2010. Mesh geometry compression for mobile graphics. In Proc. CCNC, 301--305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Limper, M., Jung, Y., Behr, J., and Alexa, M. 2013. The POP Buffer: Rapid Progressive Clustering by Geometry Quantization. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 7, 197--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Maglo, A., Lee, H., Lavoué, G., Mouton, C., Hudelot, C., and Dupont, F. 2010. Remote scientific visualization of progressive 3D meshes with X3D. In Proc. Web3D, 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Peng, J., Kim, C.-S., and Jay Kuo, C. C. 2005. Technologies for 3D mesh compression: A survey. J. Vis. Comun. Image Represent., 688--733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sons, K., Klein, F., Rubinstein, D., Byelozyorov, S., and Slusallek, P. 2010. XML3D: interactive 3D graphics for the web. In Proc. Web3D, 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SRC - a streamable format for generalized web-based 3D data transmission

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Web3D '14: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM Conference on 3D Web Technologies
      August 2014
      138 pages
      ISBN:9781450330152
      DOI:10.1145/2628588

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 August 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate27of71submissions,38%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader