skip to main content
research-article

Fully Automatic, Omnidirectional Acquisition of Geometry and Appearance in the Context of Cultural Heritage Preservation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 February 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Effective documentation and display of ancient objects is an essential task in the field of cultural heritage conservation. Digitization plays an important role in the process of creating, preserving, and accessing objects in digital space. Up to the present day, industrial scanners are used for this task, which focus mainly on the detailed reconstruction of the object’s geometry only. However, particularly important for a faithful digital presentation of the object is the appearance information—that is, a description of the used materials and how they interact with incident light. Using the world’s first full-spherical scanner, we propose a user-friendly reconstruction process that is specifically tailored to the needs of digitizing and representing cultural heritage artifacts. More precisely, our hardware specifically addresses the problem that invaluable or fragile artifacts may not be turned over during acquisition. Nevertheless, we can digitize the object completely, including its bottom. Further, by integrating appearance information into our digitization, we achieve a far more faithful digital replica with a quality comparable to a real picture of the object. But in contrast to a static picture, our representation allows one to interactively change the viewing and lighting directions freely. In addition, the results are very memory efficient, consuming only several megabytes per scanned object. In cooperation with museums and a private collector, we digitized several cultural heritage artifacts to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed process.

References

  1. Amit Agrawal, Srikumar Ramalingam, Yuichi Taguchi, and Visesh Chari. 2012. A theory of multi-layer flat refractive geometry. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’12). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 3346--3353. Available at http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/cvpr/cvpr2012.html#AgrawalRTC12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Oleg Alexander, Mike Rogers, William Lambeth, Jen-Yuan Chiang, Wan-Chun Ma, Chuan-Chang Wang, and Paul Debevec. 2010. The Digital Emily project: Achieving a photorealistic digital actor. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 30, 20--31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2010.65 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sylvain Bougnoux. 1998. From projective to Euclidean space under any practical situation, a criticism of self-calibration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 790. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.1998.710808 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nicola D’Apuzzo. 2006. Overview of 3D surface digitization technologies in Europe. In Three-Dimensional Image Capture and Applications VII. SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 6056. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 42--54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.650123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Paul E. Debevec and Jitendra Malik. 1997. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’97). ACM, New York, NY, 369--378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/258734.258884 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mark D. Fairchild. 2013. Color Appearance Models. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin A. Fischler and Robert C. Bolles. 1981. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24, 6, 381--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ryo Furukawa, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Katsushi Ikeuchi, and Masao Sakauchi. 2002. Appearance based object modeling using texture database: acquisition, compression and rendering. In Proceedings of the 13th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering (EGRW’02). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Riccardo Gherardi and Andrea Fusiello. 2010. Practical autocalibration. In Computer Vision—ECCV 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6311. Springer, 790--801. Available at http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/eccv/eccv2010-1.html#GherardiF10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Steven J. Gortler, Radek Grzeszczuk, Richard Szeliski, and Michael F. Cohen. 1996. The lumigraph. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’96). ACM, New York, NY, 43--54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/237170.237200 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Md. Zahurul Haq. 2012. Applied Measurement Systems. INTECH Open Access Publisher. Available at http://www.intechopen.com/books/applied-measurement-systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman. 2003. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Michael Holroyd, Jason Lawrence, and Todd Zickler. 2010. A coaxial optical scanner for synchronous acquisition of 3D geometry and surface reflectance. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 4, Article No. 99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778836 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jan J. Koenderink and Andrea J. Van Doorn. 1998. Phenomenological description of bidirectional surface reflection. Journal of the Optical Society of America 15, 11, 2903--2912.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Johannes Köhler, Tobias Nöll, Gerd Reis, and Didier Stricker. 2012. Robust outlier removal from point clouds acquired with structured light. In Eurographics (Short Papers), Carlos Andjar and Enrico Puppo (Eds.). Eurographics Association, 21--24. Available at http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/eurographics/eg-short2012.html#KohlerNRS 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johannes Köhler, Tobias Nöll, Gerd Reis, and Didier Stricker. 2013. A full-spherical device for simultaneous geometry and reflectance acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV’13). 355--362. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2013.6475040 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hendrik P. A. Lensch, Jan Kautz, Michael Goesele, Wolfgang Heidrich, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2003. Image-based reconstruction of spatial appearance and geometric detail. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 2, 234--257. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/636886.636891 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Vincent Lepetit, Francesc Moreno-Noguer, and Pascal Fua. 2009. EPnP: An accurate o(n) solution to the PnP problem. International Journal of Computer Vision 81, 2, 155--166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11263-008-0152-6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kenneth Levenberg. 1944. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quarterly Journal of Applied Mathmatics II, 2, 164--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Manolis I. A. Lourakis and Antonis A. Argyros. 2009. SBA: A software package for generic sparse bundle adjustment. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 36, 1, 1--30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1486525.1486527 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. David G. Lowe. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60, 2, 91--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gero Müller, Gerhard H. Bendels, and Reinhard Klein. 2005. Rapid synchronous acquisition of geometry and BTF for cultural heritage artefacts. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology, and Cultural Heritage (VAST’05). Eurographics Association, 13--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. G. N. Newsam, D. Q. Huynh, M. J. Brooks, and H. P. Pan. 1996. Recovering unknown focal lengths in self-calibration: An essentially linear algorithm and degenerate configurations. In International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 575--580.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Fred E. Nicodemus. 1965. Directional reflectance and emissivity of an opaque surface. Applied Optics 4, 7, 767--775. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.4.000767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tobias Nöll, Johannes Köhler, Gerd Reis, and Didier Stricker. 2012. High quality and memory efficient representation for image based 3D reconstructions. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications (DICTA’12). 1--8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2012.6411688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tobias Nöll, Johannes Köhler, Gerd Reis, and Didier Stricker. 2013. Faithful, compact and complete digitization of cultural heritage using a full-spherical scanner. In Proceedings of the 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 15--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Gianpaolo Palma, Marco Callieri, Matteo Dellepiane, and Roberto Scopigno. 2012. A statistical method for SVBRDF approximation from video sequences in general lighting conditions. Computer Graphics Forum (Issue of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering 2012) 31, 4, 1491--1500. Available at http://vcg.isti.cnr.it/Publications/2012/PCDS12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Gianpaolo Palma, Nicola Desogus, Paolo Cignoni, and Roberto Scopigno. 2013. Surface light field from video acquired in uncontrolled settings. In Proceedings of the Digital Heritage 2013 International Conference, Vol. 1. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 31--38. Available at http://vcg.isti.cnr.it/Publications/2013/PDCS13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Charles A. Poynton. 1993. Gamma and its disguises: The nonlinear mappings of intensity in perception, CRTs, film, and video. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal 102, 12, 1099--1108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Christopher Schwartz and Reinhard Klein. 2012. Acquisition and presentation of virtual surrogates for cultural heritage artefacts. In Proceedings of EVA 2012 Berlin. Gesellschaft zur Förderung angewandter Informatik e.V., 50--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Christopher Schwartz, Michael Weinmann, Roland Ruiters, and Reinhard Klein. 2011. Integrated high-quality acquisition of geometry and appearance for cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage (VAST'11). Eurographics Association, 25--32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/VAST/VAST11/025-032 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tali Treibitz, Yoav Schechner, Clayton Kunz, and Hanumant Singh. 2012. Flat refractive geometry. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34, 1, 51--65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2011.105 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhaoyang Wang and Bongtae Han. 2004. Advanced iterative algorithm for phase extraction of randomly phase-shifted interferograms. Optics Letters 29, 14, 1671--1673. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.001671Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Zhaoyang Wang, Dung A. Nguyen, and John C. Barnes. 2010. Some practical considerations in fringe projection profilometry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 48, 2, 218--225. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.06.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Gregory J. Ward. 1992. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’92). ACM, New York, NY, 265--272. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/133994.134078 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fully Automatic, Omnidirectional Acquisition of Geometry and Appearance in the Context of Cultural Heritage Preservation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
      Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 8, Issue 1
      Special Issue on Best Papers from Digital Heritage 2013
      February 2015
      129 pages
      ISSN:1556-4673
      EISSN:1556-4711
      DOI:10.1145/2740008
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2015
      • Accepted: 1 April 2014
      • Revised: 1 March 2014
      • Received: 1 January 2014
      Published in jocch Volume 8, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader