skip to main content
10.1145/2641798.2641817acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On optimal relay placement for improved performance in non-coverage limited scenarios

Published:21 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Low power nodes have been a hot topic in research, standardization, and industry communities, which is typically considered under an umbrella term called heterogeneous networking. In this paper we look at the problem of deploying optimally low power nodes in the context of relay networking, when an operator connects low power nodes (or small cells) via the wireless backhaul that uses the same spectrum and the same wireless access technology. We present an analytical model that can calculate optimal coordinates for low power nodes based on the input parameters, such as preferred number of nodes, their transmission power, parameters of the environment etc. The analytical calculations are complemented by extensive dynamic system level simulations, by means of which we analyze overall system performance for the obtained coordinates. We also show that even relatively marginal deviations from optimal coordinates can lead to worse system performance.

References

  1. Multi-hop relay system evaluation methodology (channel model and performance metrics). IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group, Feb 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Air interface for broadband wireless access systems: Multihop relay specification. IEEE Standard 802.16j, Jun 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3GPP TR 36.806. Relay architecture for E-UTRA (LTE-Advanced), Sep 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 3GPP TS 36.300 v12.0.0. Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA) and evolved universal terrestrial radio access network (E-UTRAN); overall description; stage 2, Mar 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Chang, C. Chang, M. Li, and C. Chang. A novel relay placement mechanism for capacity enhancement in IEEE 802.16j WiMAX networks. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pages 1--5, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Herrmann. A genetic algorithm for minimax optimization problems. In Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 1099--1103, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. E. Lang, S. Redana, and B. Raaf. Business impact of relay deployment for coverage extension in 3GPP LTE-Advanced. In IEEE International Conference on Communication, Jun 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. H. Muhlenbein, M. Georges-Schleuter, and O. Kramer. Evolution algorithms in combinatorial optimization. Parallel Computing, 7(1):65--85, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. W. Peters and R. W. Heath. The future of WiMAX: multihop relaying with IEEE 802.16j. IEEE Communications Magazine, Jan 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Sayenko, O. Alanen, and T. Hamalainen. Scheduling solution for the IEEE 802.16 base station. Computer Networks, 52:96--115, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Sayenko, O. Alanen, and H. Martikainen. Analysis of the non-transparent in-band relays in the IEEE 802.16 multi-hop system. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, pages 1--6, Apr 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Sayenko, O. Alanen, H. Martikainen, V. Tykhomyrov, O. Puchko, V. Hytönen, and T. Hamalainen. WINSE: WiMAX NS-2 Extension. Special Issue of Simulation: Software Tools, Techniques and Architectures for Computer Simulation, 87:24--44, Jan 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Shannon. Communication in the presence of noise. 37:10--21, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Sharapov and A. Lapshin. Optimal feature selection for support vector machines. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 16(3):392--397, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Y. Yang, S. Murphy, and L. Murphy. Planning base station and relay station locations in IEEE 802.16j multi-hop relay networks. In Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), pages 922--926, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Zolotukhin, V. Hytönen, T. Hamalainen, and A. Garnaev. Optimal relays deployment for 802.16j networks. Springer. Mobile Networks and Management. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 97:31--45, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On optimal relay placement for improved performance in non-coverage limited scenarios

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MSWiM '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
        September 2014
        352 pages
        ISBN:9781450330305
        DOI:10.1145/2641798

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MSWiM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate32of128submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader