skip to main content
10.1145/2642803.2642813acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecsawConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Governance Mechanisms for Healthcare Apps

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The introduction of the `app store' concept has challenged the way software is distributed and marketed: developers have easier access to customers, while customers have easy access to innovative applications. Apps today are increasingly focusing on more "mission-critical" areas like healthcare with the Apple AppStore counting more than 40,000 apps under the category "health & fitness". This rapid development of healthcare apps increases the necessity of governance as, currently, healthcare apps are not thoroughly governed. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Commission only have policies for apps that are medical devices.

In this paper, we approach the problem of how to govern healthcare and medical apps by addressing the risks the use of these apps pose, while at the same time inviting for development of new apps. To do so we (i) analyze four cases of healthcare app governance/regulation, (ii) propose the analysis of the app governance from three perspectives: aim, impact, and revenues, (iii) apply the proposed analysis in the app of the healthcare domain, and (iv) identify the governing actors and propose governance policies.

References

  1. M. Anvaari and S. Jansen. Evaluating architectural openness in mobile software platforms. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume, ECSA '10, pages 85--92, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Apple App Store. Health & fitness - app store downloads on itunes. https://itunes.apple.com/us/genre/ios-health-fitness/, Accessed 2013-11-25, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing - Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian medical devices guidance document number 35 -- device - medicine boundary products, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Council of the European Union. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. European Commission. What process does a medical device have to follow to be placed on the market? http://ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/faq/market_en.htm, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Happtique. Registry statement. http://www.happtique.com/app-certification/registry-statement/, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Holzer and J. Ondrus. Mobile application market: a developer's perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 28(1):22--31, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Hyrynsalmi, T. Mäkilä, A. Järvi, A. Suominen, M. Seppänen, and T. Knuutila. App store, marketplace, play! an analysis of multi-homing in mobile software ecosystems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, page 59, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Hyrynsalmi, A. Suominen, T. Mäkilä, A. Järvi, and T. Knuutila. Revenue models of application developers in android market ecosystem. In Software Business, pages 209--222. Springer, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Idu, T. van de Zande, and S. Jansen. Multi-homing in the apple ecosystem: why and how developers target multiple apple app stores. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, pages 122--128. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. iMedical Apps. After happtique's recent setback, is there a future for app certification? http://mobihealthnews.com/28165/happtique-suspends-mobile-health-app-certification-program/, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Jansen and E. Bloemendal. Defining app stores: The role of curated marketplaces in software ecosystems. In Software Business. From Physical Products to Software Services and Solutions, pages 195--206. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mobile Helath News. Happtique suspends mobile health app certification program. http://mobihealthnews.com/28165/happtique-suspends-mobile-health-app-certification-program/, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. NHS choices health apps library. Review Process. http://apps.nhs.uk/review-process/, Accessed 2014-06-10, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. G. G. Parker and M. W. Van Alstyne. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10):1494--1504, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J.-C. Rochet and J. Tirole. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4):990--1029, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. C. Shapiro and H. Varian. Information Rules: A Strategic Guid. Harvard Business Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Steering Committee on the Usability, Security, and Privacy of Computer Systems, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council. Toward Better Usability, Security, and Privacy of Information Technology: Report of a Workshop. National Academies Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. The National Patient Safety Agency. Healthcare risk assessment made easy, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. The Washington Post. FDA approves iPhone, iPad app for docs. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkup/2011/02/fda_oks_iphones_ipads_for_radi.html, Accessed 2014-06-10, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services -- Food and Drug Administration. Mobile medical applications -- guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/.../UCM263366.pdf, Accessed 2014-06-10, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services -- Food and Drug Administration. Medical Device Reporting for Manufacturers. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm094529.htm, Accessed 2014-06-10, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services -- Food and Drug Administration. Quality System (QS) Regulation/Medical Device Good Manufacturing Practices. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/PostmarketRequirements/QualitySystemsRegulations/default.htm, Accessed 2014-06-10, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Xia, M. Rost, and L. E. Holmquist. Business models in the mobile ecosystem. In Mobile Business and 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (ICMB-GMR), 2010 Ninth International Conference on, pages 1--8. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Governance Mechanisms for Healthcare Apps

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ECSAW '14: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops
        August 2014
        214 pages
        ISBN:9781450327787
        DOI:10.1145/2642803

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 August 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ECSAW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate29of43submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate80of120submissions,67%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader