skip to main content
10.1145/2652574.2653448acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesergoihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation subjective des algorithmes d'interpolation de zoom en imagerie médicale

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interpolation, or the zoom function, in medical imaging processing is imperative in the visualization of subtle lesion. However, the reliability and validity of developed algorithms from an observer performance perspective are poorly documented. Subjective algorithm performance differs depending on the techniques used and the properties of the original image, yet these functions are widely and frequently used in clinical practice. This study evaluated the subjective performance of six practitioners when assessing five different pathologies captured by MRI. The clinical cases were then interpolated using 50 non-adaptive zoom techniques. Preliminary results demonstrate that no algorithm emerged as the optimal interpolation method within this study and that the selection of interpolation algorithm in medical imaging appears to depend largely on the pathology under investigation.

References

  1. Bekkat N. Critères objectifs de qualité subjective d'images monochrome. Conception du modèle et validation expérimentale. Rapport de thèse. Université de Nantes. IRESTE. 1999Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chetouani A. Vers un système d'évaluation de la qualité d'image multi-critères. Rapport de thèse. Université Paris13. 2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gotchev A. Egiazarian K., Vesma J., Saramaki T. Edge-preserving image resizing using modifief B-splines. In International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2001. (ICASSP '01) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hawkins W.G., FFT interpolation for arbitrary factors: a comparison to cubic spline interpolation and linear interpolation in Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jinyu Chu Ju Lie; Jianpnig Qiao; Xiaoling Wang; Yujun Li. Gradient-based adaptive interpolation in super-resolution image restoration. In 9th International Conference on Signal Processing, 2008. pp1027--1030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lehmann T. M., Gönner C., Spitzer K. Survey: Interpolation Methods in Medical Image Processing. In Transactions on medical imaging, vol. 18(11), 1999Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Reeth Van E., Bertolino P., Nicolas M., Agrandissement d'image basé sur une carte directionnelle multirésolution. 23e colloque GRETSI, Bordeaux, 2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Thévenaz Ph., Blu T., Unser M.. Interpolation revisited. in Transaction on Medical Imaging, vol.19(7) 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Unser M., Aldroubi A., Eden M.. Fast B-splines transforms for continuous image representation and interpolation., in IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. Vol.13, pp277--285, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wang Q., Ward RK. A new orientation-adaptive interpolation method. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2007 Apr; Vol. 16 (4), pp889--900. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation subjective des algorithmes d'interpolation de zoom en imagerie médicale

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Ergo'IHM '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Ergonomie et Interaction homme-machine
      October 2012
      261 pages
      ISBN:9781450318464
      DOI:10.1145/2652574

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader