skip to main content
research-article

Technological and Organizational Adaptation of EMR Implementation in an Emergency Department

Published:17 February 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Implementation of large Health Information Technology (HIT) systems is critical to healthcare organizations and has seen heavy investment. However, research has not fully explored the adaptation of HIT systems, particularly the tensions between individual flexibility and organizational needs in the adaptation process. This study analyzes how Emergency Department (ED) clinicians adapted to a new hospital-wide Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system. We present four adaptation cases revealing two interrelated types of adaptations—technical and organizational—as responses to the new system in use. First, individual clinicians respond to the immediate alteration in workflows caused by the EMR, while the organizational adaptations later mitigate the changes in healthcare quality control resulting from the clinicians’ initial adaptation. Our analysis reflects the critical nature and value of both adaptation types, with an emphasis on the triggers and process of organizational adaptation, for the successful implementation of a socio-technical-political system in a healthcare organization.

References

  1. C. Argyris and D. Schon. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Armijo, C. McDonnell, and K. Werner. 2009. Electronic health record usability: Evaluation and use case framework. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. S. Ash, M. Berg, and E. Coiera. 2004. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11 (2004), 104--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. B. Azad and N. King. 2008. Enacting computer workaround practices within a medication dispensing system. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 17, 3 (2008), 264--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. R. Barley. 1996. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (JSTOR) 31 (1986), 78--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. D. Black, J. Car, C. Pagliari, C. Anandan, K. Cresswell, T. Bokun, B. McKinstry, R. Procter, A. Majeed, and A. Sheikh. 2011. The impact of ehealth on the quality and safety of health care: A systematic overview. PLoS Med. 8, 1 (2011), e1000387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. C. Boudreau and D. Robey. 2005. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Org. Sci. 16, 1, 3--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Boulus and P. Bjorn. 2010. A cross-case analysis of technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway. Int. J. Med. Inf. 79, 6 (2010), e97--e108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. G. Convertino, T. P. Moran, and B. A. Smith. 2007. Studying activity patterns in CSCW. In Proc. CHI2007, ACM, New York, NY, 2339--2344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. M. Cyert and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. M. DesRoches, E. G. Campbell, S. R. Rao, K. Donelan, T. G. Ferris, and A. Jha, et al. 2008. Electronic health records in ambulatory care—A national survey of physicians. New Engl. J. Med. 359, 1, 50--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. John M. Dutton and Annie Thomas. 1985. Relating technological change and learning by doing. In Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Richard S. Rosenbloom (Ed.), 2, 187--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Fitzpatrick and G. A. Ellingsen. 2012. Review of 25 years of CSCW research in healthcare: Contributions, challenges and future agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 22, 4--6, 609--665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. E. Flanagan, J. J. Saleem, L. G. Millitello, A. L. Russ, and B. N. Doebbeling. 2013. Paper-and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 20, e1, e59--e66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, New York, NY, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. W. Glickman, K. A. Baggett, C. G. Krubert, E. D. Peterson, and K. A. Schulman. 2007. Promoting quality: The health-care organization from a management perspective. Int. J. Quality Health Care 19, 6 (2007), 341--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. M. Goh, G. Gao, and R. Agarwal. 2011. Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inf. Syst. Res. 22, 3 (2011), 565--585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Goorman and M. Berg. 2000. Modeling nursing activities: Electronic patient recrods and their discontents. Nurs. Inq. 7 (March 2000), 3--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Grudin and L. Palen. 1997. Emerging groupware successes in major corporations: Studies of adoption and adaptation. Worldwide Computing and Its Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 1274. Springer-Verlag, New York, 142--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Y. Han, J. A. Carcillo, S. T. Venkataraman, R. S. B. Clark, S. Watson, T. C. Nguyen, H. Bayir, and R. A. Orr. 2005. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 116 (2005), 1506--1512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. R. B. Halbesleben, G. T. Savage, D. S. Wakefield, and B. J. Wakefield. 2010. Rework and workarounds in nurse medication administration process: Implications for work processes and patient safety. Health Care Manage. Rev. 35, 2 (2010), 124--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. W. R. Hersh. 1999. The electronic medical record: Promises and problems. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 46, 10 (1999), 772--776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R. Hillestad, J. Bigelow, A. Bower, F. Girosi, R. Meili, R. Scoville, and R. Taylor. 2005. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs 24, 5 (2005), 1103--1117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. G. P. Huber. 1990. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. Manag. Rev. 15, 1 (1990), 47--71Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A. K. Jha, C. M. DesRoches, E. G. K. Campbell Donelan, S. R. Rao, and T. G. Ferris, et al. 2009. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. New Engl. J. Med. 360, 16 (2009), 1628--1638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. M. Juran, A. B. Godfrey, R. E. Hoogstoel, and E. G. Schilling. 1999. Juran's Quality Handbook (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. V. Kaptelinin and B. A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. C. H. Kepner and B. B. Tregoe. 1976. The Rational Manager: A Systematic Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making (2nd ed.). Kepner-Tregoe, Inc., Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. H. Klein and M. Myers. 1999. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23, 1 (1999), 67--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. Kobayashi, S. R. Fussell, Y. Xiao, and F. J. Seagull. 2005. Work coordination, workflow, and workarounds in a medical context. In Proc. CHI 2005, 1561--1564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. R. Koppel, J. P. Metlay, A. Cohen, B. Abaluck, A. R. Localio, S. E. Kimmel, and B. L. Strom. 2005. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 293 (2005), 1197--1203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. R. Koppel, T. Wetterneck, J. L. Telles, and B. T. Karsh. 2008. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: Their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 15, 4 (2008), 408--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. B. Latour. 2004. Nonhumans. In Patterned Ground: Entanglements of Nature and Culture. 224--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. D. Leonard-Barton. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy 17, 5 (1988), 251--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. P. M. Leonardi. 2011. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35, 1 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. Locke and A. Lowe. 2007. A Biography: Fabrications in the life of an ERP package. Organization 14, 6 (2007), 793--814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. C. V. Lukas, S. K. Holmes, and A. B. Cohen, et al. 2007. Transformational change in health care systems: An organizational model. Health Care Manag. Rev. 32, 4 (2007), 309--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. A. Majchrzak, R. E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King, and S. Ba. 2000. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24, 4 (2000), 569--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Z. Niazkhani, H. Pirnejad, H. van der Sijs, and J. Aarts. 2011. Evaluating the medication process in the context of CPOE use: The significance of working around the system. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80, 7 (2011), 490--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. L. L. Novak, J. Brooks, S. Anders, N. Lorenzi, and C. S. Gadd. 2012. Mediating the intersections of organizational routines during the introduction of health IT systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21 (2012), 552--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. L. L. Novak, R. J. Holden, S. H. Anders, J. Y. Hong, and B.-T Karsh. 2013. Using a sociotechnical framework to understand adaptations in health IT implementation. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82, 12 (2013) e331--e344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. W. J. Orlikowski and J. D. Hofman. 1997. An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies. Sloan Manag. Rev. 38, 2 (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. W. J. Orlikowski and S. V. Scott. 2008. 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Manag. Annals 2, 1 (2008), 433--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. W. J. Orlikowski. 2009. The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. S. Y. Park and Y. Chen. 2012. Adaptation as design: Learning from an EMR deployment study. In Proc. CHI 2012. ACM, New York, NY, 2097--2106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. E. S. Patterson, M. L. Rogers, R. J. Chapman, and M. L. Render. 2006. Compliance with intended use of bar code medication administration in acute and long-term care: An observational study. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 48, 1 (2006), 15--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. L. Poissant, J. Pereira, R. Tamblyn, and Y. Kawasumi. 2005. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12 (2005), 505--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. J. Richardson and J. Ash. 2008. The effects of hands free communication devices on clinical communication: Balancing communication access needs with user control. In Proc. AMIA Annual Symposium, Washington, DC, 621--625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. N. Rosenberg. 1982. Inside the Black Box. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. J. J. Saleem, A. L. Russ, A. Neddo, P. T. Blades, B. N. Doebbeling, and B. H. Foresman. 2011. Paper persistence, workarounds, and communication breakdowns in computerized consultation management. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80, 7 (2011), 466--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. A. Tucker and A. Edmondson. 2002. Managing routine exceptions: A model of nurse problem solving behavior. Adv. Health Care Manag. 3 (2002), 87--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. M. J. Tyre and W. J. Orlikowski. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994), 5, 1 (1994), 98--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. A. A. Vogelsmeier, J. R. B. Halbesleben, and J. R. Scott-Cawiezell. 2008. Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15, 1 (2008), 114--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. S. Wang. 2003. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am. J. Med. 114, 5 (2003), 397--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. B. J. Weiner, S. M. Shortell, and J. Alexander. 1997. Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: The effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. Health Serv. Res. 32 (1997), 491--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. X. Zhou, M. Ackerman, and K. Zheng. 2011. CPOE workarounds, boundary objects, and assemblages. In Proc. CHI 2011. ACM, New York, NY, 3353--3362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Technological and Organizational Adaptation of EMR Implementation in an Emergency Department

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
        ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 22, Issue 1
        March 2015
        110 pages
        ISSN:1073-0516
        EISSN:1557-7325
        DOI:10.1145/2737795
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 February 2015
        • Revised: 1 September 2014
        • Accepted: 1 September 2014
        • Received: 1 September 2013
        Published in tochi Volume 22, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader