Ioulia Rytikova
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we describe a methodology for integrating personalized competency-based learning in a group of correlated courses in typical undergraduate education settings. The personalization is provided both in terms of content and learning pace. The material is organized in hierarchical modules based on the competencies desired to be achieved, containing both presentation materials and various type of tests. The methodology was integrated in several database and programming courses and its preliminary evaluation shows significant improvement in student grades.
- Anderson, T. Ed. 2008. The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments-the future of eLearning.eLearning Papers, 2(1), 1--8.Google Scholar
- Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. 1995. From teaching to learning - A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 27(6), 12--26.Google Scholar
- Bargiela, A., & Pedrycz, W. (2003). Granular computing: an introduction. Springer.Google Scholar
- Beetham, H., and Sharpe, R. Eds. 2013. Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brophy, J. E. 2013. Motivating students to learn. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. 2000. How people learn (pp. 285--348). J. D. Bransford Ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Candy, P., Crebert, G., and O'leary, J. 1994. Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education.Google Scholar
- Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., and Melton, M. 2011. STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering and Math. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.Google Scholar
- Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F. 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7.Google Scholar
- Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., and Johnson, C. W. 2008. Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns (Vol. 98). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dolog, P., Henze, N., Nejdl, W., & Sintek, M. (2004, May). Personalization in distributed e-learning environments. In Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters (pp. 170--179). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Draganidis, F., & Mentzas, G. (2006). Competency based management: a review of systems and approaches. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1), 51--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Froyd, J. E. 2008. White paper on promising practices in undergraduate STEM education. Commissioned paper for the Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Project, The National Academies Board on Science Education.Google Scholar
- Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37--52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2, 215--239.Google Scholar
- Kadijevich, D. M., Angeli, C., & Schulte, C. 2013. Improving Computer Science Education. Routledge. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. Theoretical foundations of learning environments, 1--23.Google Scholar
- McLoughlin, C., and Lee, M. J. 2010. Personalized and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 2012. Advance personalized learning. Instruction can be individualized based on learning styles, speeds, and interests to make learning more reliable. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996/9127.aspx.Google Scholar
- Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS quarterly, 401--426. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schaefer, D., Utschig, T., and Visco D. 2012. A Proposed Teaching and Learning Curriculum for COMPLEETE Based on Current National Trends. In Proceedings of 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sclater, N. 2008. Web 2.0, personal learning environments, and the future of learning management systems. Research Bulletin, 13, 2008--2009.Google Scholar
- Siddique, Z., Panchal, J., Schaefer, D., Haroon, S., Allen, J. K., & Mistree, F. (2012). Competencies for Innovating in the 21st Century. In ASME International Conference on Design Education.Google Scholar
- SMW (2013a) Introduction to Semantic MediaWiki. Available online at: http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Introduction_to_Semantic_MediaWiki. Accessed on: July 1st, 2013.Google Scholar
- SMW (2013b) Help: Semantic templates. Available online at: http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Semantic_templates. Accessed on: July 1st, 2013.Google Scholar
- SMW (2013c) Help: RDF export. Available online at: http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:RDF_export. Accessed on: July 1st, 2013.Google Scholar
- Thompson, K. V., Chmielewski, J., Gaines, M. S., Hrycyna, C. A., & LaCourse, W. R. (2013). Competency-based reforms of the undergraduate biology curriculum: integrating the physical and biological sciences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 162--169.Google ScholarCross Ref
- TikiWiki (2013) Tiki Feature Checklist. Available online at: http://info.tikiwiki.org/Tiki+Feature+Checklist. Accessed on: July 1st, 2013.Google Scholar
- Twigg, C. A. 2003. Models for online learning. Educause Review, 28--38.Google Scholar
- Van Harmelen, M. (2006, July). Personal Learning Environments. In ICALT(Vol. 6, pp. 815--816). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., & Milligan, C. (2009). Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society-English Version, 3(2).Google Scholar
- Wolf, A. 1995. Competence-based assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A methodology for personalized competency-based learning in undergraduate courses
Recommendations
Blended Learning in Personalized Assistive Learning Environments
In this paper, the special needs/requirements of disabled students and cost-benefits for applying blended learning in Personalized Educational Learning Environments PELE in Higher Education are studied. The authors describe how blended learning can form ...
Architecture of an Adaptive Personalized Learning Environment (APLE) for Content Recommendation
ICDTE '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Technology in EducationWith the development of sophisticated learning environments and learner-centric didactic approaches, personalized learning is in high demand. Personalization in learning environments occurs when such systems fit the learner profiles, which help in ...
A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts
A blended learning model was developed to enhance lecture delivery in a large, diverse introductory psychology unit, introducing the use of an online, personalized learning system for lecture preparation and using lecture time to extend students' ...
Comments