skip to main content
10.1145/2658861.2658887acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Signaling trouble in robot-to-group interaction.emerging visitor dynamics with a museum guide robot.

Published:29 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Once a museum guide robot is deployed in the real world, it is faced with the difficulty to deal with user utterances within a noisy environment. We present explorative analysis of the ways in which visitors signal trouble on a multimodal level when they have difficulties in understanding the robot. Such moments of trouble are investigated in the context of robot-to-group situations. Analysis will give insights into the visitors conduct at moments of trouble in robot-to-single-user and robot-to-group interactions. In a limited data set, we found that members of a group show internal gaze coordination between each other when trouble occurs due to the robot's inadequate behavior. Implications will be drawn for further developing the interactional capabilities of an autonomous robot system to be attentive and responsive to the users' needs.

References

  1. Bennewitz, M., Faber, F., Joho, D., Schreiber, M., and Behnke, S. Towards a humanoid museum guide robot that interacts with multiple persons. In IEEE-RAS 2005} (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Huwel, S., and Wrede, B. Spontaneous speech understanding for robust multi-modal human-robot communication. In COLING/ACL 2006 (2006), 391--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Klotz, D., Wienke, J., Peltason, J., Wrede, B., Wrede, S., Khalidov, V., and Odobez, J.-M. Engagement-based multi-party dialog with a humanoid robot. In SIGDIAL 2011 (2011), 341--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kobayashi, Y., Shibata, T., Hoshi, Y., Kuno, Y., Okada, M., and Yamazaki, K. "i will ask you" choosing answerers by observing gaze responses using integrated sensors for museum guide robots. In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE (2010), 652--657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Krahmer, E., Swerts, M., Theune, M., and Weegels, M. Error detection in spoken human-machine interaction. In International Journal of Speech Technology (2001), 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kuzuoka, H., Pitsch, K., Suzuki, Y., Kawaguchi, I., Yamazaki, K., Yamazaki, A., Kuno, Y., Luff, P., and Heath, C. Effect of restarts and pauses on achieving a state of mutual orientation between a human and a robot. In CSCW '08 (2008), 201--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Pitsch, K., Gehle, R., and Wrede, S. Addressing multiple participants: A museum guide robot's gaze shapes visitor participation. In ICSR (2013), 587--588.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pitsch, K., Kuzuoka, H., Suzuki, Y., Sussenbach, L., Luff, P., and Heath, C. "the first five seconds": Contingent stepwise entry into an interaction as a means to secure sustained engagement. In IEEE (2009), 985--991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pitsch, K., and Wrede, S. When a robot orients visitors to an exhibit. referential practices and interactional dynamics in the real world. In press. RO-MAN, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pitsch, K., Wrede, S., Seele, J.-C., and Sussenbach, L. Attitude of german museum visitors towards an interactive art guide robot. In HRI '11, ACM (2011), 227--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Schegloff, E. When 'others' initiate repair. In Applied Linguistics (2000), 205--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sussenbach, L., Riether, N., Schneider, S., Berger, I., Kummert, F., Lutkebohle, I., and Pitsch, K. A robot as fitness companion: towards an interactive action-based motivation model. In press. RO-MAN, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Weiss, A., Igelsbock, J., Tscheligi, M., Bauer, A., Kuhnlenz, K., Wollherr, D., and Buss, M. Robots asking for directions -- the willingness of passers-by to support robots. In HRI '10 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yamazaki, A., Yamazaki, K., Kuno, Y., Burdelski, M., Kawashima, M., and Kuzuoka, H. Precision timing in human-robot interaction: coordination of head movement and utterance. In SIGCHI '08, ACM (2008), 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yamazaki, A., Yamazaki, K., Ohyama, T., Kobayashi, Y., and Yoshinori, K. A techno-sociological solution for designing a museum guide robot: Regarding choosing an appropriate visitor. In HRI'12 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yamazaki, K., Yamazaki, A., Okada, M., Kuno, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Hoshi, Y., Pitsch, K., Luff, P., vom Lehn, D., and Heath, C. Revealing gauguin: engaging visitors in robot guide's explanation in an art museum. In SIGCHI '09, ACM (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Signaling trouble in robot-to-group interaction.emerging visitor dynamics with a museum guide robot.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '14: Proceedings of the second international conference on Human-agent interaction
      October 2014
      412 pages
      ISBN:9781450330350
      DOI:10.1145/2658861

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HAI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate27of62submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader