skip to main content
10.1145/2659787.2659803acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrtnsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting Global Resource Sharing in RUN-scheduled Multiprocessor Systems

Published:08 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The problem of sharing logical resources in multiprocessor systems cannot be satisfactorily solved using solutions intended for single processor systems. Sharing logical resources on multiprocessors is intrinsically exposed to parallel contention, which gives rise to high time penalty owing to the necessary serialization of access. Partitioned scheduling approaches help reduce contention, but at the cost of collocating every shared resource together with all of its users, which makes the partitioning problem harder. The concept of logical server used in hybrid (semi-partitioned) multiprocessor scheduling, a self-sufficient entity that can schedule a set of tasks and become a schedulable entity itself, may come handy instead. Logical servers can be used to isolate and reduce the parallelism of collaborative tasks without suffering from the limitations of partitioned approaches. In this work, we provide a generalization of RUN, an optimal multiprocessor scheduling algorithm based on logical servers, for handling shared resources. We implement and evaluate a simple spin-based locking protocol that leverages servers to group collaborative tasks and reduces parallel contention.

References

  1. T. Baker. A stack-based resource allocation policy for realtime processes. In Real-Time Systems Symposium. Proceedings., 11th, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. K. Baruah. Resource sharing in EDF-scheduled systems: A closer look. 2013 IEEE 34th Real-Time Systems Symposium, 0, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Brandenburg. A fully preemptive multiprocessor semaphore protocol for latency-sensitive real-time applications. In 25th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Brandenburg and H. Anderson. The OMLP family of optimal multiprocessor real-time locking protocols. Design Automation for Embedded Systems, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Burns and A. Wellings. Real-Time Systems and Programming Languages: Ada, Real-Time Java and C/Real-Time POSIX. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, USA, 4th edition, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Burns and A. Wellings. A schedulability compatible multiprocessor resource sharing protocol -- MrsP. In 25th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Calandrino, H. Leontyev, A. Block, U. Devi, and J. Anderson. LITMUSRT: A testbed for empirically comparing real-time multiprocessor schedulers. In Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS'06). 27th IEEE International, Dec 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Compagnin, E. Mezzetti, and T. Vardanega. Putting RUN into practice: implementation and evaluation. Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems. (ECRTS-2014), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Gai, G. Lipari, and M. Di Natale. Minimizing memory utilization of real-time task sets in single and multi-processor systems-on-a-chip. In Real-Time Systems Symposium. (RTSS 2001). Proceedings. 22nd IEEE, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. LITMUSRT. The Linux testbed for multiprocessor scheduling in real-time systems, 2014. http://www.litmus-rt.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Rajkumar. Real-time synchronization protocols for shared memory multiprocessors. In Distributed Computing Systems. Proceedings, 10th International Conference on, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Rajkumar, L. Sha, and J. Lehoczky. Real-time synchronization protocols for multiprocessors. In Real-Time Systems Symposium, Proceedings., 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Regnier, G. Lima, E. Massa, G. Levin, and S. Brandt. RUN: Optimal multiprocessor real-time scheduling via reduction to uniprocessor. In IEEE 32nd Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Ward and J. Anderson. Supporting nested locking in multiprocessor real-time systems. In Real-Time Systems (ECRTS), 24th Euromicro Conference on, July 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Global Resource Sharing in RUN-scheduled Multiprocessor Systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            RTNS '14: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems
            October 2014
            335 pages
            ISBN:9781450327275
            DOI:10.1145/2659787

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 October 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate119of255submissions,47%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader