skip to main content
10.1145/2667317.2667331acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Heartbeat: Experience the Pulse of an Electric Vehicle

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Electric Vehicles (EVs) are an emerging technology and open up an exciting new space for designing in-car interfaces. This technology enhances driving experience by a strong acceleration, regenerative breaking and especially a reduced noise level. However, engine vibrations and sound transmit valuable feedback to drivers of conventional cars, e.g. signaling that the engine is running and ready to go. We address this lack of feedback with Heartbeat, a multimodal electric vehicle information system. Heartbeat communicates (1) the state of the electric drive including energy flow and (2) the energy level of the batteries in a natural and experienceable way. We enhance the underlying Experience Design process by formulating working principles derived from an experience story in order to transport its essence throughout the following design phases. This way, we support the design of a consistent experience and resolve the tension between implementation constraints (e.g., space) and the persistence of the underlying story while building prototypes and integrating them into a technical environment (e.g., a dashboard).

References

  1. Alcamo, I.E. and Bergdahl, J. Anatomy coloring workbook. Princeton Review Publishing (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose, G. and Harris, P. Colour: n. the sensation produced by rays of light of different wavelengths, a particular variety of this. AVA Publishing SA (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BMBF: Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität der Bundesregierung. Berlin, Germany (2009). Retrieved August 21, 2013, from www.bmbf.de/pubRD/nationaler_entwicklungsplan_elektromobilitaet.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchenau, M. and Suri, J.F. Experience prototyping. DIS 2000, 424--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buxton, B. and Marquardt, N. Sketching User Experiences. Elsevier (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112, 1 (1992), 155--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Crawford, J. R. and Henry, J. D. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology 43, 3 (2004), 245--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Franke, T., Cocron, P., Bühler, F., Neumann, I., and Krems, J. F. Adapting to the range of an electric vehicle -- the relation of experience to subjectively available mobility resources. Humanist (2012), 95--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gustafsson, A., and Gyllenswärd, M. The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, 1423--1426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hassenzahl, M. Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 3, 1 (2010), 1--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., and Göritz, A. Needs, affect, and interactive products -- Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers 22, 5 (2010), 353--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hassenzahl, M. & Tractinsky, N. User experience research agenda. Behav Inform Technol 25, 2 (2006), 91--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Huppi, B., Stringer, C., Bell, J. & Capener, C. United States Patent 6658577: Breathing status LED indicator, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Isleifsdottir, J. & Larusdottir, M. Measuring the User Ex-perience of a Task Oriented Software. VUUM 2008, 97--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kercher, K. Assessing Subjective Well-Being in the Old-Old: The PANAS as a Measure of Orthogonal Dimensions of Positive and Negative Affect. Research on Aging 14, 2 (1992), 131--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Körber, M., Eichinger, A., Bengler, K., and Olaverri-Monreal, C. User Experience Evaluation in an Automotive Context. IV 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Knobel, M., Hassenzahl, M., Lamara, M., Sattler, T., Schumann, J., Eckoldt, K., and Butz, A. Clique Trip: Feeling Related in Different Cars. DIS 2012, 29--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W. & Tausch, A. Untersuchung mit einer deutschen Form der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica 42 (1996), 139--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., and Schrepp, M. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. In HCI and Usability for Education and Work. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2008), 63--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 3 (2004), 269--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lienert, G. A. and Raatz, U. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Beltz, Psychologie Verl.-Union, Weinheim (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nilsson, M. (2011). Electric Vehicles -- An interview study investigating the phenomenon of range anxiety. Lindholmen Science Park (Sweden), Task 5000, Elvire (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Norman, D. A. Emotional Desig: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic books (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Loehmann, S., Osswald, S., Gleyzes, D., Bengler, K., Tscheligi, M., and Butz, A. EVIS 2013 - 2nd Workshop on Electric Vehicle Information Systems. Adj. Proc. AutomotiveUI 2013, 7--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Quesenbery, W. and Brooks, K. Storytelling for User Experience. Crafting Stories for Better Design. Rosenfeld Media, Brooklyn, New York (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Reynolds, T. J. and Gutman, J. Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of advertising research 28, 1 (1988), 11--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., and Hoonhout, J. (eds). User Experience White Paper. Dagstuhl, Germany (2011). Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.allaboutux.org/uxwhitepaperGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Schifferstein, H.N.J-. & Spence, C. Multisensory product experience. Product Experience. Elsevier (2008), 133--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sheldon, K., Elliot, A., Kim, Y. & Kasser, T. What Is Satis-fying About Satisfying Events? Testing 10 Candidate Psy-chological Needs. J Pers Soc Psychol 2, 80 (2001), 325--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Smart fortwo Electric Drive Operator's Manual. Retrieved April 21, 2014 from http://owners.smartusa.com/userfiles/file/2014-smart-electric-drive-owners-manual.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Gamberini, L., Hoggan, E., Jacucci, G., Katzeff, C., Broms, L., and Jönsson, L. Eco-feedback on the go: Motivating energy awareness. Computer 44, 5 (2011), 38--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Strömberg, H., Andersson, P., Almgreen, S., Ericsson, J., Karlsson, M., and Nabo, A. Driver interfaces for electric vehicles. AutomotiveUI 2011, 177--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tagscherer, U. Electric mobility in China - A policy review. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 30, Germany (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tate, E., Harpster, M. & Savagian, P. The Electrification of the Automobile. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars 1, 1 (2009), 156--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Turrentine, T., Garas, D., Lentz, A., Woodjack, J. The UC Davis MINI E Consumer Study. ITS 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson, D., Clark, L. & Tellegen, A. Development and vali-dation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54, 6, (1988), 1063--1070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. White House Office of the Press Secretary. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/25/remarks-president-state-union-addressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wickens, C. D. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 3, 2 (2002), 159--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Heartbeat: Experience the Pulse of an Electric Vehicle

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AutomotiveUI '14: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      September 2014
      287 pages
      ISBN:9781450332125
      DOI:10.1145/2667317

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      AutomotiveUI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate36of79submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader