skip to main content
10.1145/2669485.2669502acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HyPR Device: Mobile Support for Hybrid Patient Records

Published:16 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The patient record is one of the central artifacts in medical work that is used to organize, communicate and coordinate important information related to patient care. In many hospitals a double record consisting of an electronic and paper part is maintained. This practice introduces a number of configuration problems related to finding, using and aligning the paper and electronic patient record. In this paper, we describe the exploration into the Hybrid Patient Record (HyPR) concept. Based on design requirements derived from a field study, followed by a design study using a technology probe, we introduce the HyPR Device, a device that merges the paper and electronic patient record into one system. We provide results from a clinical simulation with eight clinicians and discuss the functional, design and infrastructural requirements of such hybrid patient records. Our study suggests that the HyPR device decreases configuration work, supports mobility in clinical work and increases awareness on patient data.

References

  1. K. Ahmed, M. Jawad, M. Abboudi, A. Gavazzi, A. Darzi, T. Athanasiou, J. Vale, M. S. Khan, and P. Dasgupta. Effectiveness of procedural simulation in urology: a systematic review. The Journal of urology, 186(1):26--34, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. T. Arai, D. Aust, and S. E. Hudson. Paperlink: a technique for hyperlinking from real paper to electronic content. In Proc. of CHI '97, pages 327--334. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. E. Bardram. Activity-based computing for medical work in hospitals. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 16(2):10, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. E. Bardram and C. Bossen. Mobility work: The spatial dimension of collaboration at a hospital. Comput. Supported Coop. Work, 14(2):131--160, Apr. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Chen. Documenting transitional information in emr. In Proc. of CHI '10, pages 1787--1796. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. F. Geyer, J. Budzinski, and H. Reiterer. Ideavis: a hybrid workspace and interactive visualization for paper-based collaborative sketching sessions. In Proc. of NordiCHI '12, pages 331--340. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. Guimbreti'ere. Paper augmented digital documents. In Proc. of UIST '03, pages 51--60. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. H. Harper, K. P. O'Hara, A. J. Sellen, and D. J. Duthie. Toward the paperless hospital British Journal of Anaesthesia, 78(6):762--767, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. M. Heiner, S. E. Hudson, and K. Tanaka. Linking and messaging from real paper in the paper pda. In Proc. of UIST '99, pages 179--186. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Houben, S. Nielsen, M. Esbensen, and J. Bardram. Noosphere: An activity-centric infrastructure for distributed interaction. In Proc. of MUM '13, pages 100--110. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. R. Klemmer, M. W. Newman, R. Farrell, M. Bilezikjian, and J. A. Landay. The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site. In Proc. of UIST '01, pages 1--10. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Kushniruk, C. Nohr, S. Jensen, and E. Borycki. From usability testing to clinical simulations: Bringing context into the design and evaluation of usable and safe health information technologies. Yearb Med Inform, 78:85, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Liao, F. Guimbreti'ere, and K. Hinckley. Papiercraft: a command system for interactive paper. In Proc. of UIST '05, pages 241--244. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Liao, Q. Liu, B. Liew, and L. Wilcox. Pacer: fine-grained interactive paper via camera-touch hybrid gestures on a cell phone. In Proc. of CHI '01, pages 2441--2450. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Luff and C. Heath. Mobility in collaboration. In Proc. of CSCW '98, pages 305--314. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. W. E. Mackay, G. Pothier, C. Letondal, K. Bøegh, and H. E. Sørensen. The missing link: augmenting biology laboratory notebooks. In Proc. of UIST '02, pages 41--50. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Y. Park and Y. Chen. Adaptation as design: Learning from an emr deployment study. In Proc. of CHI '12, pages 2097--2106. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Pederson. Magic touch: A simple object location tracking system enabling the development of physical-virtual artefacts in office environments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(1):54--57, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Pietrzak, S. Malacria, and É. Lecolinet. S-notebook: augmenting mobile devices with interactive paper for data management. In Proc. of AVI '12, pages 733--736. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. D. Rodriguez, J. Favela, E. A. Martínez, and M. A. Muñoz. Location-aware access to hospital information and services. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on, 8(4):448--455, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. J. Saleem, A. L. Russ, C. F. Justice, H. Hagg, P. R. Ebright, P. A. Woodbridge, and B. N. Doebbeling. Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record. International journal of medical informatics, 78(9):618--628, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. J. Sellen and R. Harper. The myth of the paperless office. The MIT Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. B. Skov and T. Høegh. Supporting information access in a hospital ward by a context-aware mobile electronic patient record. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(4):205--214, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Tabard, W. E. Mackay, and E. Eastmond. From individual to collaborative: the evolution of prism, a hybrid laboratory notebook. In proc. of CSCW '08, pages 569--578. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Tang and S. Carpendale. Evaluating the deployment of a mobile technology in a hospital ward. In Proc. of CSCW '08, pages 205--214. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. C. Tang, J. S. Ash, D. W. Bates, J. M. Overhage, and D. Z. Sands. Personal health records: definitions, bene--ts, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2):121--126, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. R. H. Trigg, J. Blomberg, and L. Suchman. Moving document collections online: The evolution of a shared repository. In Proc. of ECSCW '99, pages 331--350. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. N. Weibel, A. Ispas, B. Signer, and M. C. Norrie. Paperproof: a paper-digital proof-editing system. In CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2349--2354. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. P. Wellner. The digitaldesk calculator: tangible manipulation on a desk top display. In Proc. of UIST '91, pages 27--33. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. C. Winkler, J. Seifert, C. Reinartz, P. Krahmer, and E. Rukzio. Penbook: Bringing pen+paper interaction to a tablet device to facilitate paper-based workflows in the hospital domain. In Proc. of ITS '13, pages 283--286. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. R. Yeh, C. Liao, S. Klemmer, F. Guimbreti'ere, B. Lee, B. Kakaradov, J. Stamberger, and A. Paepcke. Butterflynet: a mobile capture and access system for field biology research. In Proc. of CHI '06, pages 571--580. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. S. Zamarripa, V. M. Gonzalez, and J. Favela. The augmented patient chart: seamless integration of physical and digital artifacts for hospital work. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services, pages 1006--1015. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. X. Zhou, M. S. Ackerman, and K. Zheng. I just don't know why it's gone: maintaining informal information use in inpatient care. In Proc. of CHI '09, pages 2061--2070. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. HyPR Device: Mobile Support for Hybrid Patient Records

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ITS '14: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces
        November 2014
        524 pages
        ISBN:9781450325875
        DOI:10.1145/2669485

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ITS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate31of112submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate119of418submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader