skip to main content
10.1145/2669485.2669545acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Single Locus of Control in a Tangible Paper-based Tabletop Application: An Exploratory Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multiple loci of control is one of the main affordances of tangible tabletop UIs due to their capability for simultaneous manipulation. However, there is a tension between the efficiency given by simultaneous manipulation and the need to coordinate and reflect in group activity. We implemented a central point of control to synchronize the group work and afford opportunities for equal participation in a tabletop application. In this study, we analyzed log and video data of seven groups of primary school students using a tabletop application. The results show that log data about this central control's position and rotation can be a predictor of equal participation, also helping interpret group performance. Finally, we discuss the implications of such findings, e.g., to provide teachers with useful information about group collaborative processes.

References

  1. Bonnard, Q., Verma, H., Kaplan, F., and Dillenbourg, P. Paper interfaces for learning geometry. In 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. Springer, 2012, 37--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dillenbourg, P., and Evans, M. Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 4 (2011), 491--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Do-Lenh, S. Supporting reflection and classroom orchestration with tangible tabletops. École Polytechnique Federale De Laussane (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hancock, M. S., Vernier, F. D., Wigdor, D., Carpendale, S., and Shen, C. Rotation and translation mechanisms for tabletop interaction. In Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, 2006. TableTop 2006. First IEEE International Workshop on, IEEE (2006), 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., and Jaspers, J. Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning Computers & Education 49, 4 (2007), 1037--1065. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S. D., and Greenberg, S. Roles of orientation in tabletop collaboration: Comprehension, coordination and communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13, 5--6 (2004), 501--537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Martin, T., and Schwartz, D. L. Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science 29, 4 (2005), 587--625.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. McNeil, N., and Jarvin, L. When theories don't add up: disentangling the manipulatives debate. Theory into Practice 46, 4 (2007), 309--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Morris, M. R., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C., and Vernier, F. Beyond social protocols: Multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2004), 262--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ojose, B., and Sexton, L. The effect of manipulative materials on mathematics achievement of first grade students. The Mathematics Educator 12, 1 (2009), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rick, J., Harris, A., Marshall, P., Fleck, R., Yuill, N., and Rogers, Y. Children designing together on a multi-touch tabletop: an analysis of spatial orientation and user interactions. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM (2009), 106--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rick, J., Marshall, P., and Yuill, N. Beyond one-size-fits-all: How interactive tabletops support collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM (2011), 109--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Scott, S. D., Carpendale, M. S. T., and Inkpen, K. M. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2004), 294--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Single Locus of Control in a Tangible Paper-based Tabletop Application: An Exploratory Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITS '14: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces
      November 2014
      524 pages
      ISBN:9781450325875
      DOI:10.1145/2669485

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 November 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      ITS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate31of112submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate119of418submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader