skip to main content
10.1145/2669711.2669961acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile learning adoption from informal into formal: an extended TAM model to measure mobile acceptance among teachers

Published:01 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile learning is currently spreading from the informal education field to the formal one. In this process, teacher involvement occupies a central role, and in order to ensure it is necessary to know the factors that lead to the acceptance of these technologies.

The technology acceptance model (TAM) constitutes a suitable tool that has been frequently used when it comes to study the adoption process of information systems (SI) in educational and non-educational contexts.

The present communication proposes an extended TAM model with constructs from other theories, designed for the evaluation of the acceptance of the mobile technologies by the teaching body.

References

  1. Abbad, M. M., Morris, D. and de Nahlik, C. 2009. Looking under the Bonnet: Factors Affecting Student Adoption of ELearning Systems in Jordan. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 2 (Apr. 2009), 6--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ajzen, I. 1985. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control From Cognition to Behavior, Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. eds.Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 11--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Debei, M. M. 2014. The quality and acceptance of websites: An empirical investigation in the context of higher education. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 15, 2 (Feb. 2014), 170--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bandura, A. 1978. Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavior Change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 2, 191--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Beschorner, B. and Hutchison, A. 2013. iPads as a Literacy Teaching Tool in Early Childhood. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1, 1 (Jan. 2013), 16--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourgonjon, J., De Grove, F., De Smet, C., Van Looy, J., Soetaert, R. and Valcke, M. 2013. Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers. Comput. Educ., 67, 0 (Sep. 2013), 21--35. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Buchanan, T., Sainter, P. and Saunders, G. Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25, 1 (Apr. 2013), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, F., Looi, C. and Chen, W. 2009 Integrating technology in the classroom: a visual conceptualization of teachers' knowledge, goals and beliefs. J. Comput. Assisted Learn., 25, 5 (Jul. 2009), 470--488. DOI=10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00323.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chen, H. and Tseng, H. 2012. Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Eval. Program Plann., 35, 3 (Aug. 2012), 398--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chen, L., Gillenson, M. L. and Sherrell, D. L. 2002. Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39, 8 (Sep. 2002), 705--719. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chen, Y., Lin, Y., Yeh, R. C. and Lou, S. 2013. Examining factors affecting college students' intention to use web-based instruction systems: Towards an integrated model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 2 (Apr. 2013), 111--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cochrane, T. D. 2011. Beyond the Yellow Brick Road: Mobile Web 2.0 Informing a New Institutional E-Learning Strategy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15, 4 (Nov. 2011), 60--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Conde González, M. Á, García Peñalvo, F. J., Alier, M. and Piguillem, J. 2013. The Implementation, Deployment and Evaluation of a Mobile Personal Learning Environment. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19, 7 (Jan 2013), 854--872.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, F. D. 1986. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (Sep. 1989), 319--340 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 22, 14 (Jul. 1992), 1111--1132. DOI=10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. De Smet, C., Bourgonjon, J., De Wever, B., Schellens, T. and Valcke, M. 2012. Researching instructional use and the technology acceptation of learning management systems by secondary school teachers. Comput. Educ., 58, 2 (Feb. 2012), 688--696. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Deshpande, Y., Bhattacharya, S. and Yammiyavar, P. 2012. A behavioral approach to modeling Indian children's ability of adopting to e-learning environment. In Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI), 2012 4th International Conference on, (Kharagpur, India, December 27-29 2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Echeng, R., Usoro, A. and Majewski, G. 2013. Acceptance of Web 2.0 in learning in higher education: An empirical study of a Scottish University. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4, 10 (2013), 146--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, Massachusets, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fundación Telefónica. 2013. La Sociedad de la Información en España 2013. Retrieved June 16, 2014 from http://www.fundacion.telefonica.com/es/arte_cultura/publica ciones/sie/sie2013.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gao, Y. 2005. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Educational Hypermedia: A Field Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14, 3 (Jul. 2005), 237--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. 2003. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1 (Mar. 2003), 51--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Heijden, H. 2000. E-Tam: a revision of the Technology Acceptance Model to explain website revisits. Research memoranda. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hernández García, Á. 2008. Desarrollo de un modelo unificado de adopción del comercio electrónico entre empresas y consumidores finales. Aplicación al mercado español. Doctoral Thesis. E. T. S. I. Telecomunicación (UPM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hesser, T. L. and Schwartz, P. M. 2013. iPads in the Science Laboratory: Experience in Designing and Implementing a Paperless Chemistry Laboratory Course. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 14, 2 (Apr. 2013), 5--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Holden, H. and Rada, R. 2011. Understanding the Influence of Perceived Usability and Technology Self-Efficacy on Teachers' Technology Acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43, 4 (Jun. 2011), 343--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Hsu, C. and Lu, H. 2004. Why Do People Play On-line Games? An Extended TAM with Social Influences and Flow Experience. Inf. Manage., 41, 7 (Sep. 2004), 853--868. DOI=10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Huffman, W. H. and Huffman, A. H. 2012. Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college. Comput. Hum. Behav., 28, 2 (Mar. 2012), 583--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Hung, M. and Jen, W. 2012. The adoption of mobile health management services: An empirical study. J. Med. Syst., 36, 3 (Jun. 2012), 1381--1388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B. and Schmidt-Crawford, D. 2012. Exploring the Use of the iPad for Literacy Learning. The Reading Teacher, 66, 1 (Jul. 2012), 15--23. DOI=10.1002/TRTR.01090.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jou, M. and Wang, J. 2012. Observations of achievement and motivation in using cloud computing driven CAD: Comparison of college students with high school and vocational high school backgrounds. Comput. Hum. Behav., (Mar. 2012), 364--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kim, M., Choi, M. and Kim, J. 2012. Factors influencing the usage and acceptance of multimedia-based digital textbooks in pilot school. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 6, 6 (Jun. 2012), 1707--1717.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. King, W. R. and He, J. 2006. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 6 (Sep. 2006), 740--755. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kiraz, E. and Ozdemir, D. 2006. The Relationship between Educational Ideologies and Technology Acceptance in Pre-service Teachers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9, 2 (Apr. 2006), 152--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Koutromanos, G., Styliaras, G. and Christodoulou, S. 2014. Student and in-service teachers' acceptance of spatial hypermedia in their teaching: The case of HyperSea. Education and Information Technologies, (Jan 2014), 1--20. DOI=10.1007/s10639-013-9302-8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kuo, K., Liu, C. and Ma, C. 2013. An investigation of the effect of nurses' technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, 1 (Aug. 2013), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K. and Chen, Z. 2005. Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42, 8 (Dec. 2005), 1095--1104. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. and Hsu, C. 2011. Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to the Technology Acceptance Model: Supporting Employees' Intentions to use E-Learning Systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14, 4 (Oct. 2011), 124--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, 3 (Jan. 2003), 191--204. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Liao, Y., Wang, K., Chan, P., Lin, Y., Chin, J. and Chen, Y. 2010. Digital folklore contents on education of childhood folklore and corporate identification system design. In Proceedings of ICADL. 15--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Liaw, S., Huang, H. and Chen, G. 2007. Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Comput. Educ., 49, 4 (Dec. 2007), 1066--1080. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mah, B. Y. 2009. An investigation on students' acceptance of writing web logs: A test of technology acceptance model. In Education Technology and Computer, 2009. ICETC '09. International Conference on (Singapore, April 17-20 2009), 181--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Maranguniè, N. and Granié, A. 2014. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, (Feb. 2014), 1--15. DOI=10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Navarro, I., Galindo, A. and Fonseca, D. 2013. Augmented Reality Uses in Educational Research Projects: The Falcones Project, a Case Study Applying Technology in the Humanities Framework at High School Level. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality. (Salamanca, Spain, November 3-15, 2013). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 411--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ong, C. and Lai, J. 2006. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Comput. Hum. Behav., 22, 5 (Sep. 2006), 816--829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Padilla-Meléndez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R. and Garrido-Moreno, A. 2013. Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Comput. Educ., 63, 0 (Apr. 2013), 306--317. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Park, N., Lee, K. M. and Cheong, P. H. 2007. University instructors' acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1 (Dec. 2007), 163--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Parra-Meroño, M. C. and Carmona-Martínez, M. M. 2011. Las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en la enseñanza superior española. Factores explicativos del uso del campus virtual. Estudios Sobre Educacion, 20 (Jun 2011), 73--98Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Persico, D., Manca, S. and Pozzi, F. 2014. Adapting the technology acceptance model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Comput. Hum. Behav., 30 (Jan. 2014), 614--622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Rahmat, M. K. and Au, W. K. 2012. The role of teacher-teaching experience in VAE teachers' integration of ICT. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2012 (Singapore, November 26-30,2012), 762--766.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramayah, T. 2010. The role of voluntariness in distance education students' usage of a course website. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 3 (Jul. 2010), 96--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. and Martínez, F. J. 2006. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 8 (Aug. 2006), 683--696. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K. and Stamper, S. E. 2012. iLearning: The Future of Higher Education? Student Perceptions on Learning with Mobile Tablets. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12, 2 (Jun. 2012), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Saadé, R. and Bahli, B. 2005. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 42, 2 (Jan. 2005), 317--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Sánchez Prieto, J. C., Olmos Migueláñez, S., García Peñalvo, F. J. and Torrecilla Sánchez, E. M. 2014. Las tabletas digitales en educación formal: características principales y posibilidades pedagógicas. In IV Congreso Internacional de Competencias Básicas: Competencia digital y tratamiento de la información. Aprender en el siglo XXI. (Ciudad Real, España, April 9-11, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Sánchez, R. A. and Hueros, A. D. 2010. Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1632--1640. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Sek, Y., Lau, S., Teoh, K., Law, C. and Parumo, S. B. 2010. Prediction of user acceptance and adoption of smart phone for learning with Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 20 (Aug. 2010), 2395--2402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Sharples, M., Amedillo Sanchez, I., Milrad, M. and Vavoula, G. 2009. Mobile learning: small devices, big issues. In Technology Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products, Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., Jong, T. d. and Barnes, S. eds.. Springer, Heidelberg, 2009, 233--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Stantchev, V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Soto-Acosta, P. and Misra, S. 2014. Learning management systems and cloud file hosting services: A study on students' acceptance. Comput. Hum. Behav., 31, 1 (Feb. 2014), 612--619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Teo, T. 2012. Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: an integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20, 1 (Jan. 2012), 3--18. DOI=10.1080/10494821003714632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Teo, T. 2011. Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Comput. Educ., 57, 4 (Dec. 2011), 2432--2440. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Teo, T. and Noyes, J. 2011. An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Comput. Educ., 57, 2 (Sep. 2011), 1645--1653. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Terras, M. M. and Ramsay, J. 2012. The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 5 (Sep. 2012), 820--832. DOI=10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01362.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Traxler, J. 2009. Current state of mobile learning. In Mobile learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training Ally, M. ed.. AU Press, Edmonton, 9--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., Segers, M. and Braeken, J. 2013. The construct validity and predictive validity of a self-efficacy measure for student teachers in competence-based education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 3 (Sep. 2013), 169--179. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.05.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 2 (Feb. 2000), 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. 2008. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 2 (May 2008), 273--315. DOI=10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Gordon B. Davis and Davis, F. D. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (Sep. 2003), 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Wilkins, M. A. 2009. Factors influencing acceptance of electronic health records in hospitals. Perspectives in health information management, 6, 5, (Apr. 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu, C. and Liu, C. 2013. Acceptance of ICT-mediated teaching/learning systems for elementary school teachers: Moderating effect of cognitive styles. Education and Information Technologies, (Oct. 2013), 1--21. DOI=10.1007/s10639-013-9290-8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Wu, I. and Chen, J. 2005. An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: Anempirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 6 (Jun. 2005), 784--808. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Yadegaridehkordi, E., Iahad, N. A. and Baloch, H. Z. 2013. Success factors influencing the adoption of M-learning. Int. J. Contin. Eng. Educ. Life-Long Learn., 23, 2 (2013), 167--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Yamakawa, P., Delgado, C., Díaz, E., Garayar, E. and Laguna, H. 2013. Factors influencing the use of mobile technologies in a university environment: A case from Latin America. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 9, 2 (2013), 24--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z. and Zhou, N. 2005. Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals. Information & Management, 42, 4 (May 2005), 575--589. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.03.001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Yu, K., Lin, K., Han, F. and Hsu, I. 2012. A model of junior high school students' attitudes toward technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 4 (Jan 2012), 423--436. DOI=10.1007/s10798-011-9154-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Yuen, A. H. K. and Ma, W. W. K. 2008. Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 3 (Jul. 2008), 229--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Mobile learning adoption from informal into formal: an extended TAM model to measure mobile acceptance among teachers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TEEM '14: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
        October 2014
        711 pages
        ISBN:9781450328968
        DOI:10.1145/2669711

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 October 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader