skip to main content
10.1145/2671188.2749334acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmrConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving Diversity in Image Search via Supervised Relevance Scoring

Published:22 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Results returned by commercial image search engines should include relevant and diversified depictions of queries in order to ensure good coverage of users' information needs. While relevance has drastically improved in recent years, diversity is still an open problem. In this paper we propose a reranking method that could be implemented on top of such engines in order to provide a better balance between relevance and diversity. Our method formulates the reranking problem as an optimization of a utility function that jointly considers relevance and diversity. Our main contribution is the replacement of the unsupervised definition of relevance that is commonly used in this formulation with a supervised classification model that strives to capture a query and application-specific notion of relevance. This model provides more accurate relevance scores that lead to significantly improved diversification performance. Furthermore, we propose a stacking-type ensemble learning approach that allows combining multiple features in a principled way when computing the relevance of an image. An empirical evaluation carried out on the datasets of the MediaEval 2013 and 2014 "Retrieving Diverse Social Images" (RDSI) benchmarks confirms the superior performance of the proposed method compared to other participating systems as well as a state-of-the-art, unsupervised reranking method.

References

  1. T. Arni, P. Clough, M. Sanderson, and M. Grubinger. Overview of the imageclefphoto 2008 photographic retrieval task. In Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access, pages 500--511. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Babenko, A. Slesarev, A. Chigorin, and V. Lempitsky. Neural codes for image retrieval. In ECCV, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In SIGIR, pages 335--336, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Chen and D. R. Karger. Less is more: probabilistic models for retrieving fewer relevant documents. In SIGIR, pages 429--436, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Corney, C. Martin, A. Göker, E. Spyromitros-Xioufis, S. Papadopoulos, Y. Kompatsiaris, L. Aiello, and B. Thomee. Socialsensor: Finding diverse images at mediaeval 2013. In MediaEval, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D.-T. Dang-Nguyen, L. Piras, G. Giacinto, G. Boato, and F. De Natale. Retrieval of diverse images by pre-filtering and hierarchical clustering. In MediaEval, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Deselaers, T. Gass, P. Dreuw, and H. Ney. Jointly optimising relevance and diversity in image retrieval. In ACM CIVR '09, New York, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871--1874, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Ionescu, M. Menéndez, H. Müller, and A. Popescu. Retrieving diverse social images at MediaEval 2013: Objectives, dataset and evaluation. In MediaEval, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. Ionescu, A. Popescu, M. Lupu, A. Gînsca, and H. Müller. Retrieving diverse social images at MediaEval 2014: Challenge, dataset and evaluation. In MediaEval, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N. Jain, J. Hare, S. Samangooei, J. Preston, J. Davies, D. Dupplaw, and P. H. Lewis. Experiments in diversifying flickr result sets. In MediaEval, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Y. Jia, E. Shelhamer, J. Donahue, S. Karayev, J. Long, R. Girshick, S. Guadarrama, and T. Darrell. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. Spyromitros-Xioufis, S. Papadopoulos, I. Kompatsiaris, G. Tsoumakas, and I. Vlahavas. A comprehensive study over vlad and product quantization in large-scale image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. E. Spyromitros-Xioufis, S. Papadopoulos, Y. Kompatsiaris, and I. Vlahavas. Socialsensor: Finding diverse images at mediaeval 2014. In MediaEval, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. H. van Leuken, L. Garcia, X. Olivares, and R. van Zwol. Visual diversification of image search results. In WWW, pages 341--350, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. H. Wolpert. Stacked generalization. Neural networks, 5(2):241--259, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. X. Zhai, W. W. Cohen, and J. Lafferty. Beyond independent relevance: methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 10--17, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving Diversity in Image Search via Supervised Relevance Scoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMR '15: Proceedings of the 5th ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
      June 2015
      700 pages
      ISBN:9781450332743
      DOI:10.1145/2671188

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICMR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate48of127submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate254of830submissions,31%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICMR '24
      International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
      June 10 - 14, 2024
      Phuket , Thailand

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader