skip to main content
10.1145/2677199.2680591acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BodyPods: Designing Posture Sensing Chairs for Capturing and Sharing Implicit Interactions

Published:15 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today, it is not uncommon to find ourselves remote from those we care about. Despite the impact of mobile and social technologies on connectedness, recent studies suggest that it could be these very technologies that exacerbate a sense of loneliness. In attempt to help people feel more connected, we designed and created BodyPods, a remotely paired set of communicating chairs that facilitate a sense of presence by leveraging implicit actions such as sitting to communicate that someone you care about is home. Each BodyPod consists of a flexible surface with six pressure-sensitive and light-emitting pads that adjusts its shape to the body anatomy. As a person's body moves, limbs exert different pressure on each pad creating a live digital "bodyprint" that is mapped on the pads of other BodyPods through color and light. Findings from a 10 person user study suggest bodyprints may be distinctive, particularly among small groups of people with different body types.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tei0275.mp4

mp4

48.2 MB

References

  1. Chang, A., Resner, B., Koerner, B., Wang, X., and Ishii, H., LumiTouch: an emotional communication device. Ext. Abstracts CHI '01, 313--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chang, A., O'Modhrain, S., Jacob, R., Gunther, E., and Ishii, H., Comtouch: design of a vibrotactile communication device. Proc. DIS 2002, 312--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daian, I., van Ruiten, A. M., Visser, A., and Zubic. S., Sensitive chair: a force sensing chair with multimodal real-time feedback via agent. Proc. ECCE 2007, 163--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dodge, C., The bed: a medium for intimate communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 1997, 371--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. http://www. dukta. com/en/referenceprojects. htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffin, Jo, The Lonely Society UK Mental Health Foundation, Accessed Aug. 2014, from: http://www. mentalhealth.org. uk/content/assets/PDF/publications/the_lonely_society_re port. pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S., Leduc, N., Hagström, A., and Bayley, O., Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home. Proc. CHI 2001, 325--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kowalski, R., Loehmann, S., and Hausen, D., cubble: a multi-device hybrid approach supporting communication in long-distance relationships. Proc. TEI 2013. 201--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lab of Things, http://www. lab-of-things. com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mota, S., "Automated Posture Analysis For Detecting Learner's Affective State", MIT MS Thesis, Sept. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Peltier Tile, http://www. explorecuriocity.org/DesktopModules/CC_VideoPlayer/wfrm/wfrmPrintDocu ment.aspx?contentid=2657Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Probst, K., Lindlbauer, D., Haller, M., Schwartz, B., and Schrempf., A., A chair as ubiquitous input device: exploring semaphoric chair gestures for focused and peripheral interaction. Proc. CHI '14. 4097--4106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Suzuki, K., and Hashimoto, S., Feellight: a communication device for distant nonverbal exchange. Proc. of the ACM SIGMM ETP 2004 workshop, 40--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Tollmar, K., Junestrand, S., and Torgny, O., Virtually living together. Proc. DIS 2000, 83--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mutlu, B., Krause, A., Eorlizze J., Guestrin C., and Hodgins, J., Robust, low-cost, non-intrusive sensing and recognition of seated postures. Proc. UIST'07. 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Asghar A., Shirehjini N., Yassine A., and Shirmohammadi S. Design and implementation of a system for body posture recognition. Multimedia Tools and Applications 70, 3 (2014), 1637--1650 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gibson, J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press, Boston, MA, USA, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. BodyPods: Designing Posture Sensing Chairs for Capturing and Sharing Implicit Interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '15: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      January 2015
      766 pages
      ISBN:9781450333054
      DOI:10.1145/2677199

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 January 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate63of222submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader