skip to main content
10.1145/2701126.2701183acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The interactive technological devices: play or learn?

Published:08 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the works related to the development of cognitive, perception, attention, sensory motor operations and memory relate to play with the use of interactive technological devices. The scope of this paper is categorized into children's speech, play and cognitive learning development. Play in this paper describes children's exploration over the use of technological devices for socializing context, with the use or play with technological devices, and the search of internet tools and new media technologies, and the use of text and talk with the medium. The aim of this study is to form a collective literature review for children's learning development and social interactions with interactive technological mobile media, learning development context and human psychological growth in the future research.

References

  1. Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Freire, P. 2007. Pedagogy of the Heart. Copyright@1997 by Anna Maria Araujo Freire, The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., and Sharples, M. 2005. Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning, Report 11, Nesta Future Lab Series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E. 1978. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sandford, R., Ulicsak, M., Facer, K. and Rudd, T. 2006. Teaching with Games: Using commercial off-the-shelf computer games in formal education, Report for Nesta Futurelab, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Price, S. and Rogers, Y. 2004. Let's Get Physical: The Learning Benefits of Interacting in Digitally Augmented Physical Spaces. Computers & Education 43, 2004: pp. 137--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bruner, J. S. 1973. Going Beyond the Information Given, pp. 72, New York: Norton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. S. 1996. The Culture of Education, pp. 56--60. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rogoff, B. 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Barron, B. 2000. Achieving co-ordination in collaborative problem solving groups, Journal of Learning Sciences 9 (4): pp. 403--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Blatchford, P., and Kutnick, P. 2003. 'Developing Group Work in Everyday Classrooms', Special Issue, International Journal of Educational Research, 39 (1--2): pp. 1--172. Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E. and Galton, M. 2003 'Towards a Social Pedagogy of Classroom Groupwork', International Journal of Educational Research 39: pp. 153--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Van Oers, B. and Hannikainen, M. 2001. 'Some thoughts on togetherness: an introduction', International Journal of Early Years Education 9 (2): pp. 101--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Barron, B. 2000. 'Achieving co-ordination in collaborative problem-solving groups', Journal of the Learning Sciences 9 (4): pp. 403--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Nystrand, M. 1986. The Structure of Written Communication: Studies of Reciprocity Between Writers and Readers, London: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ryder, J. and Campbell, L. 1989. 'Groupsense: when groupwork does not add up to "groupwork"', Pastoral Care in Education 7 (1): pp. 22--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Flavell, J. H. 1979. "Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. A New Area of Cognitive-Development Inquiry". American Psychologist 34: pp. 906--911.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Rogers, Y and Ellis, J. 1994. Distributed Cognition: An Alternative Framework for Analyzing and Explaining Collaborative working Published in Journal of Information Technology, vol 9(2): pp. 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Goswami, U. and Bryant, P. 2007. Primary Research Survey 2/1a, Children's Cognitive Development & Learning, Copyright © University of Cambridge; Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; Cited in Bruner, J. S. & Weinreich-Haste, H. 1987. Making Sense: The Child's Construction of the World, pp. 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E. 1978. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; London, England. See Levina, R. E. for Vygotsky's ideas on the planning role of speech in children, Voprosi Psikhologii, 14., 1938: pp. 105--115. Although Levina made these observations in the late 1920s, they remain unpublished except for this brief explication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Originally from R. E. Levina, for Vygotsky's ideas on the planning role of speech in children, Voprosi Psikhologii, 14., 1938: pp. 105--115. Although Levina made these observations in the late 1920s, they remain unpublished except for this brief explication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. 2007. Rethinking Pedagogic for a Digital Age, Designing and Delivering e-Learning, An Introduction to Rethinking Pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jenkins, H. 2008. Convergence Culture, Where Old and New Media Collide, New York and London: New York University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkins, H. 2005. "Love Online," in Henry Jenkins (ed.), Fans, Gamers, and Bloggers, New York: New York University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. JISC, Innovative Practice with E-learning: A good Practice Guiden to Embedding Mobile and Wireless Technologies into Everyday Practice, Bristol: Joint Information Services Committee.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, A. and Traxler, J., Designing for Mobile and Wireless Learning. Edited by Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. 2007. pp. 180--190. Rethinking Pedagogic for a Digital Age, Designing and Delivering e-Learning, An Introduction to Rethinking Pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The interactive technological devices: play or learn?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IMCOM '15: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
          January 2015
          674 pages
          ISBN:9781450333771
          DOI:10.1145/2701126

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 January 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader