skip to main content
10.1145/2701973.2702063acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Do People Purchase a Robot Because of Its Coolness?

Published:02 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to verify the research model that coolness and perceived usefulness are effective predictor variables, attitude is mediating variable, and purchase intention is criterion variable. In total, 41 respondents with no prior exposure robot JIBO completed the on-line survey after watching the scenario movie of explaining its usage. Coolness and perceived usefulness is significant predictor for attitude, and attitude has positive impact on purchase intention. Based on the results, a "cool" product is more likely to arouse potential consumer's purchase intention directly and indirectly in the market. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed in detail.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. PSYCHOL BULL, 84, 5, 888.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Batra, R., and Ahtola, O. T. 1991. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. MARKET LETT, 2, 2, 159--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., and Wielinga, B. 2010. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. INT J SOC ROBOT, 2, 4, 361--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Holbrook, M. B., and Hirschman, E. C. 1982. The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. J CONSUM RES, 132--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kulviwat, S., Bruner, I. I., Gordon, C., Kumar, A., Nasco, S. A., and Clark, T. 2007. Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology. PSYCHOL MARKET, 24, 12, 10591084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sundar, S. S., Tamul, D. J., and Wu, M. 2014. Capturing "cool": measures for assessing coolness of technological products. INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, 72, 2, 169--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. G. 2000. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS QUART, 115--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., and Grohmann, B. 2003. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. J MARKETING RES, 40, 3, 310--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. WARREN, C., and CAMPBELL, M. C. 2014. What Makes Things Cool? How Autonomy Influences Perceived Coolness. J CONSUM RES, 41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Do People Purchase a Robot Because of Its Coolness?

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts
                March 2015
                336 pages
                ISBN:9781450333184
                DOI:10.1145/2701973

                Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 2 March 2015

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • abstract

                Acceptance Rates

                HRI'15 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate92of102submissions,90%Overall Acceptance Rate192of519submissions,37%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader