skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702160acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ImmerseBoard: Immersive Telepresence Experience using a Digital Whiteboard

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

ImmerseBoard is a system for remote collaboration through a digital whiteboard that gives participants a 3D immersive experience, enabled only by an RGBD camera (Microsoft Kinect) mounted on the side of a large touch display. Using 3D processing of the depth images, life-sized rendering, and novel visualizations, ImmerseBoard emulates writing side-by-side on a physical whiteboard, or alternatively on a mirror. User studies involving three tasks show that compared to standard video conferencing with a digital whiteboard, ImmerseBoard provides participants with a quantitatively better ability to estimate their remote partners' eye gaze direction, gesture direction, intention, and level of agreement. Moreover, these quantitative capabilities translate qualitatively into a heightened sense of being together and a more enjoyable experience. ImmerseBoard's form factor is suitable for practical and easy installation in homes and offices.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn271.mp4

mp4

17.8 MB

References

  1. Apperley, M., McLeod, L., Masoodian, M., Paine, L., Phillips, M., Rogers, B., and Thomson, K. Use of video shadow for small group interaction awareness on a large interactive display surface. AUIC '03 (2003), 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Birnholtz, J. P., Grossman, T., Mak, C., and Balakrishnan, R. An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display. CHI '07, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Diamant, E. I., Fussell, S. R., and Lo, F.-L. Collaborating across cultural and technological boundaries: team culture and information use in a map navigation task. IWIC '09, 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Doucette, A., Gutwin, C., Mandryk, R. L., Nacenta, M., and Sharma, S. Sometimes when we touch: how arm embodiments change reaching and collaboration on digital tables. CSCW '13, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Elrod, S., Bruce, R., Gold, R., Goldberg, D., Halasz, F., Janssen, W., Lee, D., McCall, K., Pedersen, E., Pier, K., Tang, J., and Welch, B. Liveboard: a large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations, and remote collaboration. CHI '92, 599--607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Genest, A. M., Gutwin, C., Tang, A., Kalyn, M., and Ivkovic, Z. Kinectarms: a toolkit for capturing and displaying arm embodiments in distributed tabletop groupware. CSCW '13, 157--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ishii, H., and Kobayashi, M. Clearboard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact. CHI '92, 525--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jouppi, N. P., Iyer, S., Thomas, S., and Slayden, A. Bireality: mutually-immersive telepresence. MULTIMEDIA '04, 860--867. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Junuzovic, S., Inkpen, K., Blank, T., and Gupta, A. Illumishare: sharing any surface. CHI '12, 1919--1928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kendon, A. Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta psychologica 26 (1967), 22--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Khan, A., Matejka, J., Fitzmaurice, G., and Kurtenbach, G. Spotlight: directing users' attention on large displays. CHI '05, 791--798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kim, K., Bolton, J., Girouard, A., Cooperstock, J., and Vertegaal, R. Telehuman: effects of 3d perspective on gaze and pose estimation with a life-size cylindrical telepresence pod. CHI '12, 2531--2540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Liu, S., Chou, P. A., Zhang, C., Zhang, Z., and Chen, C. W. Virtual view reconstruction using temporal information. IEEE ICME 2012, 115--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Misawa, K., Ishiguro, Y., and Rekimoto, J. Livemask: a telepresence surrogate system with a face-shaped screen for supporting nonverbal communication. AVI '12, 394--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Moezzi, S. Immersive telepresence. MultiMedia, IEEE 4, 1 (1997), 17--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Morikawa, O., and Maesako, T. Hypermirror: toward pleasant-to-use video mediated communication system. CSCW '98, 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mulligan, J., Zabulis, X., Kelshikar, N., and Daniilidis, K. Stereo-based environment scanning for immersive telepresence. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on 14, 3 (2004), 304--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nescher, T., and Kunz, A. An interactive whiteboard for immersive telecollaboration. The Visual Computer 27, 4 (2011), 311--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Proudlock FA, Shekhar H, G. I. Coordination of eye and head movements during reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44, 7 (2003), 2991--2998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Cutts, M., Lake, A., Stesin, L., and Fuchs, H. The office of the future: a unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. SIGGRAPH '98 (1998), 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rekimoto, J. A multiple device approach for supporting whiteboard-based interactions. CHI '98, 344--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Roussel, N. Experiences in the design of the well, a group communication device for teleconviviality. MULTIMEDIA '02, 146--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Streitz, N. A., Geissler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W., Rexroth, P., Seitz, P., and Steinmetz, R. i-land: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. CHI '99 (1999), 120--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tan, K.-H., Robinson, I., Samadani, R., Lee, B., Gelb, D., Vorbau, A., Culbertson, B., and Apostolopoulos, J. Connectboard: A remote collaboration system that supports gaze-aware interaction and sharing. MMSP '09 (2009), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tang, A., Pahud, M., Inkpen, K., Benko, H., Tang, J. C., and Buxton, B. Three's company: understanding communication channels in three-way distributed collaboration. CSCW '10, ACM (2010), 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tang, J. C., and Minneman, S. Videowhiteboard: video shadows to support remote collaboration. CHI '91, 315--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tseng, B. L., Shae, Z.-Y., Leung, W. H., and Chen, T. Immersive whiteboards in a networked collaborative environment. In IEEE Multimedia and Expo (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Uchihashi, S., and Tanzawa, T. Mixing remote locations using shared screen as virtual stage. MM '11, 1265--1268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zhang, C., Cai, Q., Chou, P., Zhang, Z., and Martin-Brualla, R. Viewport: A distributed, immersive teleconferencing system with infrared dot pattern. MultiMedia, IEEE 20, 1 (2013), 17--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zillner, J., Rhemann, C., Izadi, S., and Haller, M. 3d-board: A whole-body remote collaborative whiteboard. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '14 (2014), 471--479. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ImmerseBoard: Immersive Telepresence Experience using a Digital Whiteboard

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2015
        4290 pages
        ISBN:9781450331456
        DOI:10.1145/2702123

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader