skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702342acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Being Seen: Co-Interpreting Parkinson's Patient's Movement Ability in Deep Brain Stimulation Programming

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to address the use of movement assessment sensors for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Eleven patients with Parkinson's disease who had under-gone deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery were observed during follow-up appointments for adjustments to the stimulation settings. We examine the ways in which the patients and clinicians assess movement ability together in the clinic and how these assessments relate to the treatment of functional disability through DBS. We have found that effective assessment of movement and treatment efficacy is a collaborative and interpretive process (co-interpretation) that relies on input from patients, clinicians, and caregivers. From these findings we describe the design directions for movement sensors to support co-interpretation of movement in a clinical context as opposed to simply movement definition.

References

  1. Alač, M. (2008). Working with brain scans: Digital images and gestural interaction in fMRI laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 38(4), 483--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baston, C., Mancini, M., Schoneburg, B., Horak, F., & Rocchi, L. (2014). Postural strategies assessed with inertial sensors in healthy and parkinsonian subjects. Gait & posture, 40(1), 70--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonato, P., Sherrill, D. M., Standaert, D. G., Salles, S. S. & Akay, M. (2004). Data mining techniques to detect motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. Proc. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 7, 4766--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brown, R.G., MacCarthy, B., Jahanshahi, M., Marsden, C.D. (1989). Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with Parkinsonism. Arch Neurol., 46, 955--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chen, Y. (2011). Health information use in chronic care cycles. In Proc. CSCW, 485--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Coovert, S. A., Ducey, A., Grichanik, M., Coovert, M. D., & Nelson, R. (2012). Hey doc, is that your stethoscope?: increasing engagement in medical education and training with iPads. In Proc of CSCW, 71--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. El-Gohary, M., Pearson, S., Mcnames, J., Mancini, M., Horak, F., Mellone, S., and Chiari. L. (2014). Continuous Monitoring of Turning in Patients with Movement Disability. Sensors, 14(1), 356--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Frost, J., & Smith, B. (2002). Visualizing health practice to treat diabetes. In CHI'02 Extended Abstracts, 606--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gabel M., Renshaw E., Schuster A., & Gilad-Bachrach R. (2012). Full Body Gait Analysis with Kinect. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghika, J., Wiegner, A. W., Fang, J. J., Davies, L. , Young, R. R. & Growdon, J. H. (1993). Portable system for quantifying motor abnormalities in Parkinson's disease. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 40(3), 276--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Grimes, A., Landry, B. M., & Grinter, R. E. (2010). Characteristics of shared health reflections in a local community. In Proc of CSCW, 435--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hasegawa, H., Samuel, M., Douiri, A., Ashkan, K. (2014). Patients' Expectations in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson Disease. World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Higginson IJ, Astin P., Dolan S. (1998). Where do cancer patients die? Ten-year trends in the place of death of cancer patients in England. Pall. Med., 12, 353--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hirschauer, S. (1991). The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Social Studies of Science, 21(2), 279--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hoff, J.I., van den Plas, A.A., Wagemans, E.A., & van Hilten, J.J. (2001). Accelerometric assessment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease. Move. Dis., 16, 58--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Horak, F. B., & Mancini, M. (2013). Objective biomarkers of balance and gait for Parkinson's disease using body-worn sensors. Move. Dis., 28(11), 1544--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Joyce, K. (2005). Appealing images: Magnetic resonance imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 35(3), 437--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kaplan, B. (1995). Objectification and negotiation in interpreting clinical images: Implications for computerbased patient records. Art. Intell. in Med., 7, 439--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Keijsers, N. L., Horstink, M.W. & Gielen, S. C. (2006). Ambulatory motor assessment in Parkinson's disease. Move. Dis., 21, 34--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Keijsers, N.L., Horstink, M.W., van Hilten, J.J., Hoff, J.I. & Gielen, C.C. (2000). Detection and assessment of the severity of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease by neural networks. Move. Dis., 15, 1104--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, J.W., Lee, J.H., Kwon, Y., Kim, C.S., Eom, G.M., Koh, S.B., & Park, K.W. (2010). Quantification of bradykinesia during clinical finger taps using a gyrosensor in patient's with Parkinson's disease. Med. & Bio. Engin. & Comp., 49, 365--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Liu, L. S., Hirano, S. H., Tentori, M., Cheng, K. G., George, S., Park, S. Y., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). Improving communication and social support for caregivers of high-risk infants through mobile technologies. In Proc CSCW, 475--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mamykina, L., & Mynatt, E. (2009). Interpreting Health and Wellness Information. Symonds, J. et al. (eds.) Auto-identification and Ubiquitous Computing Applications, Idea Group Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., & Kasnitz, D. (2010). Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proc of ASSETS, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What's so'critical'about critical disability studies?. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mentis, H.M. & Taylor, A. (2013). Imaging the Body: Embodied Vision in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Proc. of CHI, 1479--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Morrow, C. D., Smentkowski, K., Schwartz, S., Armstrong, M. J., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Anderson, K. E., ... & Shulman, L. M. (2014). Does spouse participation influence quality of life reporting in patients with Parkinson's disease? Quality of Life Research, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Pareés, I., Saifee, T.A., Kassavetis, P., Kojovic, M., Rubio-Agusti, I., Rothwell, J.C., & Edwards, M.J. (2012). Believing is perceiving: Mismatch between selfreport and actigraphy in psychogenic tremor. Brain, 135(1), 117--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Patel, S., Lorincz, K., Hughes, R., Huggins, N. (2009). Monitoring motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors. IEEE Trans. on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 13(6), 864--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Patrick, S.K., Denington, A.A., Gauthier, M.J.A., Gillard, D.M., and Prochazka, A. (2001). Quantification of the UPDRS rigidity scale. IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 9(1), 31--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Prasad, A. (2005). Making images/making bodies: Visibilizing and disciplining through magnetic resonance imaging. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 291--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Pratt, W., Unruh, K., Civan, A., & Skeels, M. (2006). Personal Health Information Management. CACM, 49(1), p51--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Shulman, L. M., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Anderson, K. E., Vaughan, C. G., Reich, S. G., Fishman, P. S., & Weiner, W. J. (2008). The evolution of disability in Parkinson disease. Movement Disorders, 23(6), 790--796.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Spieker, S., Jentgens, C., Boose, A. & Dichgans, J. (1995). Reliability, specificity and sensitivity of longterm tremor recordings. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 97, 326--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Storni, C. (2009). The politics of design in Sociotechnical dispositif. Reconciling Healthcare toward a future patient-centric perspective. Proc. of Interact.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Thielgen, T., Foerster, F., Fuchs, G., Hornig, A., & Fahrenberg, J. (2004). Tremor in Parkinson's disease: 24-hr monitoring with calibrated accelerometry. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 44, 137--146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Weiss, A., Herman, T., Giladi, N., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2014). Objective Assessment of Fall Risk in Parkinson's Disease Using a Body-Fixed Sensor Worn for 3 Days. PloS one, 9(5), e96675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Weiss, A., Herman, T., Plotnik, M., Brozgol, M., Maidan, I., Giladi, N., ... & Hausdorff, J. M. (2010). Can an accelerometer enhance the utility of the Timed Up & Go Test when evaluating patients with Parkinson's disease?. Medical engineering & physics, 32(2), pp. 119--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Being Seen: Co-Interpreting Parkinson's Patient's Movement Ability in Deep Brain Stimulation Programming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader