ABSTRACT
The paper offers theoretical support for research through design (RtD) by arguing that in order to legitimize and make use of research through design as research, HCI researchers need to explore and clarify how RtD objects might contribute to knowledge. Leveraging the tradition of aesthetics in the arts and humanities, we argue that while the intentions of the object's designer are important and while annotations are a good mechanism to articulate them, the critical reception of objects is equally foundational to RtD's broader knowledge impacts within HCI. Such a scholarly critical reception is needed precisely because of the potential inexhaustibility of design objects' meanings; their inability to be paraphrased simply and adequately. Offering a multilevel analysis of the (critical) design fiction Menstruation Machine by Sputniko!, the paper explores how design objects co-produce knowledge, by working through complex design problem spaces in non-reductive ways, proposing new connections and distinctions, and embodying design ideas and processes across time and minds.
Supplemental Material
- Archer, B. (1995). The Nature of Research. Co-design, interdisciplinary journal of design, Jan 1995, 6--13.Google Scholar
- Bardzell, J. (2011). Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with computers, 23(6), 604--621. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J., and Bardzell, S. (2013). What is critical about critical design?. In Proc. of CHI'13. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., and Stolterman, E. (2014). Reading critical designs: Supporting reasoned debates about critical designs. In Proc. of CHI'2014. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bertelsen, O., and Pold, S. (2004). Criticism as an approach to interface aesthetics. In Proc. of NordiCHI'04. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blythe, M. (2014). Research through design fiction: Narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proc. of CHI'2014. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bolter, J. D. and Gromala, D. (2003). Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency. The MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowers, J. (2012). The logic of annotated portfolios: Communicating the value of "Research through Design." In Proc. of DIS2012. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. M. & Kellogg, W. A. (1989) Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design. In Proc. of CHI '89, 7--14. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, N. (2009). On Criticism. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dalsgaard, P. (2010). Research in and through design: An interaction design research approach. In Proc. of OzCHI '10. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DiSalvo, C. (2012). Spectacles and Tropes: Speculative Design and Contemporary Food Cultures. The Fiberculture Journal 2012 (20), 109--122.Google Scholar
- Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013). Speculative Everything. The MIT Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eldridge, R. (2003). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proc. of CHI'03. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Feinberg, M., Carter, D., & Bullard, J. Always somewhere, never there: Using critical design to understand database interactions. Proc. CHI'14, ACM, 1941--1950. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernaeus, Y. and Vallgårda, A. (2014) Ajna: negotiating forms in the making of a musical cabinet. In Proc. of DIS'14. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Flusser, V. (1995) On the Word Design: An Etymological Essay. Design Issues, 11(3), 50--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2), 219--245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frayling, C. (1993/4). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1(1), 1--5.Google Scholar
- Galey, A. & Reuker, S. (2010). How a prototype argues. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25(4), 405--24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? In Proc. of CHI'12. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gibson, J. (2007). Fiction and the Weave of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art. Hackett.Google Scholar
- Graham, G. (2005). Philosophy of the Arts. 3rd ed. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guyer, P. History of Modern Aesthetics. In J. Levinson, ed., 2003, The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, 25--62.Google Scholar
- Hansen, L.K. (2011) The Interface at the Skin. In Andersen, C.U. and Pold, S. (eds.) Interface Criticism. Aesthetics Beyond Buttons. Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
- Hansen, L. K. and Kozel, S. (2007) Embodied imagination: a hybrid method of designing for intimacy. Digital Creativity, 18 (4), 207--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyndrup, M. (2008). Den æstetiske relation. Gyldendal.Google Scholar
- Löwgren, J. (2009). Toward an articulation of interaction esthetics. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 15(2), 129--146 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ludvigsen, M. (2006). Designing for social interaction: physical, co-located social computing. PhD Dissertation, Center for Interactive Spaces, Aarhus. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press: Durham.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nelson, H. and Stolterman, E. (2013). The Design Way. 2nd ed. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Ozaki, H. (2010). Menstruation Machine. http://www.di10.rca.ac.uk/hiromiozaki/menstruationmachine.html (accessed 20 Sept 2014)Google Scholar
- Seel, M. (2005). Aesthetics of Appearing. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stolterman, E., and Wiberg, M. (2010). Concept-driven interaction design research. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(2), 95--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Verbeek, P.-P. (2012). Politics at Issue. On Art and the Democratization of Things. In Boomgaard, J. et al. (eds.), Open 24: Politics of Things. nai010, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
- Yang, H. (2014). Review of MoMA Design and Violence Debate. http://yanghanzi.com/2014/04/13/to-whatextent-can-design-transcend-human-experienceboundaries/ (accessed 20 Sept 2014)Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, J. & Forlizzi, J. (2014) Research through design in HCI. In Olson, J. & Kellogg, W., eds., Ways of Knowing in HCI, Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, E., Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. of CHI'07. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of Research through Design. In Proc. of DIS'10. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge
Recommendations
Designing for Play that Permeates Everyday Life: Towards New Methods for Situated Play Design
HTTF 2019: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019In this paper we discuss strategies to support our design research agenda of promoting playful engagement within everyday activities and situations. We argue that this agenda is in alignment with the ethos of the third wave of HCI. To support design in ...
On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology
AbstractWhat is the role of the researcher in a world that is continuously enacted and reconfigured in sociomaterial practices, a world in which subject and object, structure and agency, body and mind, knower and known, are assumed to be ...
Highlights- The paper contributes to the development of epistemological practices available to draw upon for researchers assuming a sociomaterial approach.
Do You Have to Pee?: A Design Space for Intimate and Somatic Data
DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceThe management of bodily excretion is an everyday biological function necessary for our physiological and psychological well-being. In this paper, I investigate interaction design opportunities for and implications of leveraging intimate and somatic ...
Comments