skip to main content
10.1145/2724660.2728684acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Supporting Face-to-Face Like Communication Modalities for Asynchronous Assignment Feedback in Math Education

Published:14 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The digitization of educational course content has proved to be problematic for math instructors due to the lack of quality feedback tools that can accommodate the commenter to efficiently express math formulae and convey descriptions about complex ideas contextualized in situ. This paper proposes that RichReview, a document annotation system which creates inking, voice and deictic gestures on top of the student's submitted work, is a possible formative math feedback solution, because it enables face-to-face like commentary within the contexts of the document at hand. A preliminary qualitative evaluation study conducted while having students receive RichReview feedback showed promise to our approach to enhance the quality of feedback, with the implication that incorporating multi-modal feedback into workflows can be an effective method to address elements of feedback submissions lacking in coursework that has moved online.

References

  1. Anderson, R., et al. "Classroom presenter: Enhancing interactive education with digital ink." Computer 40.9 (2007): 56--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Black, P & Wiliam, D; Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. The Phi Delta Kappa International 80, 2 (1998), 139--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheatle, A. and Randles, B. "A Further Examination of RichReview: Comparing Tools Instructors Use to Provide Feedback." manuscript (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowder, E. Gestures at Work in Sense-Making Science Talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3) (1996). 173--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Edmison, B., and Edwards, S., et al. Using a Rubric-based assessment system to improve feedback and student performance in course-management systems. ASEE Southeast Section Conference, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hattie, J, and Timperley, H. "The power of feedback." Review of educational research 77.1 (2007), 81--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Halliday, M.A.K. "Towards a language-based theory of learning." Linguistics and education 5.2 (1993): 93--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kress, G., ed. Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kulkarni, C.,et al. "Peer and self assessment in massive online classes." Design Thinking Research. Springer International Publishing, 2015. 131--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicol, D. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Center for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement (CAPLE) (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Price, M., et al. "Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect?."Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35.3 (2010): 277--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sadler, P., and Good, E. "The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning." Educational assessment 11.1 (2006): 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yoon, D, Chen, N., Guimbretiere, F., and Sellen, A. "RichReview: blending ink, speech, and gesture to support collaborative document review." Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yoon, D., Chen, N. and Guimbretière, F. "TextTearing: Opening white space for digital ink annotation." Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Zeleznik, R., et al. "Hands-on math: a page-based multi-touch and pen desktop for technical work and problem solving." Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Face-to-Face Like Communication Modalities for Asynchronous Assignment Feedback in Math Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      L@S '15: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
      March 2015
      438 pages
      ISBN:9781450334112
      DOI:10.1145/2724660

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 March 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress

      Acceptance Rates

      L@S '15 Paper Acceptance Rate23of90submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader