skip to main content
10.1145/2739480.2754690acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On Evolutionary Approaches to Wind Turbine Placement with Geo-Constraints

Published:11 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wind turbine placement, i.e., the geographical planning of wind turbine locations, is an important first step to an efficient integration of wind energy. The turbine placement problem becomes a difficult optimization problem due to varying wind distributions at different locations and due to the mutual interference in the wind field known as wake effect. Artificial and environmental geological constraints make the optimization problem even more difficult to solve. In our paper, we focus on the evolutionary turbine placement based on an enhanced wake effect model fed with real-world wind distributions. We model geo-constraints with real-world data from OpenStreetMap. Besides the realistic modeling of wakes and geo-constraints, the focus of the paper is on the comparison of various evolutionary optimization approaches. We propose four variants of evolution strategies with turbine-oriented mutation operators and compare to state-of-the-art optimizers like the CMA-ES in a detailed experimental analysis on three benchmark scenarios.

References

  1. AWS Truepower. AWS Openwind, 2008. http://awsopenwind.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. B\"ack and M. Schütz. Intelligent mutation rate control in canonical genetic algorithms. In Foundations of Intelligent Systems, 9th International Symposium, ISMIS '96, Zakopane, Poland, June 9--13, 1996, Proceedings, pages 158--167, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Beyer and H. Schwefel. Evolution strategies - A comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing, 1(1):3--52, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Deutscher Wetterdienst. COSMO-DE: numerical weather prediction model for Germany, 2012. http://tinyurl.com/dwd-cosmo-de.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ENERCON GmbH. Product Overview, 2015. http://tinyurl.com/enercon101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. M. Haklay and P. Weber. Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4):12--18, Oct. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Hansen. The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review. In Towards a new evolutionary computation. Advances in estimation of distribution algorithms, pages 75--102. Springer, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. F. Herbert-Acero, O. Probst, P.-E. Rethore, G. C. Larsen, and K. K. Castillo-Villar. A review of methodological approaches for the design and optimization of wind farms. Energies, 7(11):6930--7016, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. G. Kanji. 100 Statistical Tests. SAGE Publications, London, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Kusiak and Z. Song. Design of wind farm layout for maximum wind energy capture. Renewable Energy, 35(3):685--694, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. Lückehe, O. Kramer, and M. Weisensee. An evolutionary approach to geo-planning of renewable energies. In 28th International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection: ICT for Energy Effieciency (EnviroInfo), pages 501--508, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Manwell, J. McGowan, and A. Rogers. Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, London, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. K. Morales and C. V. Quezada. C.v.: A universal eclectic genetic algorithm for constrained optimization. In In: Proceedings 6th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT, pages 518--522. Verlag Mainz, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Neis, D. Zielstra, and A. Zipf. The street network evolution of crowdsourced maps: Openstreetmap in germany 2007--2011. Future Internet, 4(1):1--21, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. H. Neustadter. Method for evaluating wind turbine wake effects on wind farm performance. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, pages 107--240, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. The Wind Power. Wind farms in Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015. http://tinyurl.com/parks-lower-saxony.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Wagner, J. Day, and F. Neumann. A fast and effective local search algorithm for optimizing the placement of wind turbines. Renewable Energy, 51(0):64--70, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Wagner, K. Veeramachaneni, F. Neumann, and U.-M. O'Reilly. Optimizing the layout of 1000 wind turbines. In European Wind Energy Association Annual Event, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Wan, J. Wang, G. Yang, X. Li, and X. Zhang. Optimal siting of wind turbines using real coded genetic algorithms. European Wind Energy Association Conference and Exhibition, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Wan, J. Wang, G. Yang, and X. Zhang. Optimal micro-siting of wind farms by particle swarm optimization. In Advances in Swarm Intelligence, volume 6145 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 198--205. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. W. Weibull. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal Applied Mechanics - Transactions of ASME, 3(18):293--297, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On Evolutionary Approaches to Wind Turbine Placement with Geo-Constraints

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
          July 2015
          1496 pages
          ISBN:9781450334723
          DOI:10.1145/2739480

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 July 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          GECCO '15 Paper Acceptance Rate182of505submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader