skip to main content
10.1145/2745555.2746655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Dyslexia and web accessibility: synergies and challenges

Published:18 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the main challenges of studying dyslexia for web accessibility. These are: (1) measuring the impact of dyslexia in the population; (2) the limitations of the up-to-date studies; and (3) including dyslexia in the Web accessibility guidelines. While some aspects are already addressed by the guidelines, we propose the inclusion of simple recommendations for typeface and font size that would benefit both people with and without dyslexia. We also suggest a change in the current methodologies to overcome up-to-date research limitations using larger and more representative datasets.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. British Dyslexia Association. Dyslexia style guide, January 2012. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Caldwell, M. Cooper, L. G. Reid, and G. Vanderheiden. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. WWW Consortium (W3C), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. S. Carrillo, J. Alegría, P. Miranda, and N. Sánchez. Evaluación de la dislexia en la escuela primaria: Prevalencia en español (Evaluation of dyslexia in primary school: The prevalence in Spanish). Escritos de Psicología (Psychology Writings), 4(2): 35--44, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Dixon. Comparative study of disabled vs. non-disabled evaluators in user-testing: dyslexia and first year students learning computer programming. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, pages 647--656, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dyslexia Research Institute, January.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. F. Enguita, L. M. Martínez, and J. R. Gómez. Fracaso y abandono escolar en España (School Failure in Spain). Obra Social, Fundación la Caixa, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Evett and D. Brown. Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers-clear text for all. Interacting with Computers, 17: 453--472, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Gardner. Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic books, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Gregor and A. F. Newell. An empirical investigation of ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics may be alleviated using computer techniques. In Proc. ASSETS'00, ASSETS 2000, pages 85--91, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Interagency Commission on Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Report to the U.S. Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. International Dyslexia Association. Definition of dyslexia: http://interdys.org/DyslexiaDefinition.htm, 2011. Based in the initial definition of the Research Committee of the Orton Dyslexia Society, former name of the IDA, done in 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. I. Kriss and B. J. W. Evans. The relationship between dyslexia and Meares-Irlen Syndrome. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3): 350--364, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. P. Lewis, editor. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. SIL International, Dallas, Texas, sixteenth edition, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Logan. Dyslexic entrepreneurs: The incidence; their coping strategies and their business skills. Dyslexia, 15(4): 328--346, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Louise Tickle. Dyslexic entrepreneurs? Why they have a competitive edge, January 2015. www.theguardian.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. R. Lyon. Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45(1): 3--27, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. G. R. Lyon, S. E. Shaywitz, and B. A. Shaywitz. A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1): 1--14, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. E. McCarthy and S. J. Swierenga. What we know about dyslexia and web accessibility: a research review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9: 147--152, June 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Nielsen. Lower-literacy users, 2012. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050314.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. B. A. O'Brien, J. S. Mansfield, and G. E. Legge. The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3): 332--349, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. D. Pollak. Dyslexia, the self and higher education: Learning life histories of students identified as dyslexic. Trentham Books Ltd, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Rello. DysWebxia. A Text Accessibility Model for People with Dyslexia. PhD thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. The presence of English and Spanish dyslexia in the Web. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 8: 131--158, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. Good fonts for dyslexia. In Proc. ASSETS'13, Bellevue, Washington, USA, 2013. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. L. Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, L. Dempere, and H. Saggion. Frequent words improve readability and short words improve understandability for people with dyslexia. In Proc. INTERACT '13, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. L. Rello and M. Ballesteros. Detecting readers with dyslexia using machine learning with eye tracking measures. In Proc. W4A '15, Florence, Italy, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. L. Rello, G. Kanvinde, and R. Baeza-Yates. Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In Proc. W4A '12, Lyon, France, 2012. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. L. Rello, M. Pielot, M. C. Marcos, and R. Carlini. Size matters (spacing not): 18 points for a dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia. In Proc. W4A '13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. V. F. Santana, R. Oliveira, L. D. A. Almeida, and M. Ito. Firefixia: An accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia. In Proc. W4A '13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. F. Serrano and S. Defior. Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1): 81--95, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. F. R. Vellutino, J. M. Fletcher, M. J. Snowling, and D. M. Scanlon. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1): 2--40, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death (ICD-10). World Health Organization, Geneva, 10th edition, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dyslexia and web accessibility: synergies and challenges

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          W4A '15: Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference
          May 2015
          214 pages
          ISBN:9781450333429
          DOI:10.1145/2745555

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 May 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          W4A '15 Paper Acceptance Rate11of31submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader