skip to main content
10.1145/2746539.2746551acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Excluded Grid Theorem: Improved and Simplified

Published:14 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the Excluded Grid Theorem of Robertson and Seymour. This is a fundamental result in graph theory, that states that there is some function f:Z+→ Z+, such that for any integer g> 0, any graph of treewidth at least f(g), contains the (g x g)-grid as a minor. Until recently, the best known upper bounds on f were super-exponential in g. A recent work of Chekuri and Chuzhoy provided the first polynomial bound, by showing that treewidth f(g)=O(g98 poly log g) is sufficient to ensure the existence of the (g x g)-grid minor in any graph. In this paper we provide a much simpler proof of the Excluded Grid Theorem, achieving a bound of $f(g)=O(g^{36} poly log g)$. Our proof is self-contained, except for using prior work to reduce the maximum vertex degree of the input graph to a constant.

References

  1. Matthew Andrews. Approximation algorithms for the edge-disjoint paths problem via Raecke decompositions. In Proceedings of IEEE FOCS, pages 277--286, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chandra Chekuri and Julia Chuzhoy. Polynomial bounds for the grid-minor theorem. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '14, pages 60--69, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chandra Chekuri and Julia Chuzhoy. Degree-3 treewidth sparsifiers. In Piotr Indyk, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, January 4--6, 2015, pages 242--255. SIAM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chandra Chekuri and Alina Ene. Poly-logarithmic approximation for maximum node disjoint paths with constant congestion. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 326--341. SIAM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chandra Chekuri, Sanjeev Khanna, and F. Bruce Shepherd. A deletable edge lemma for general graphs. Manuscript, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra Chekuri, Sanjeev Khanna, and F. Bruce Shepherd. Multicommodity flow, well-linked terminals, and routing problems. In Proc. of ACM STOC, pages 183--192, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chandra Chekuri, Sanjeev Khanna, and F. Bruce Shepherd. The all-or-nothing multicommodity flow problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 42(4):1467--1493, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chandra Chekuri and Nitish Korula. A graph reduction step preserving element-connectivity and applications. In Proc. of ICALP, pages 254--265, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chandra Chekuri, Guyslain Naves, and F. Bruce Shepherd. Maximum edge-disjoint paths in k-sums of graphs. In Fedor V. Fomin, Rusins Freivalds, Marta Z. Kwiatkowska, and David Peleg, editors, Automata, Languages, and Programming - 40th International Colloquium, ICALP 2013, Riga, Latvia, July 8--12, 2013, Proceedings, Part I, volume 7965 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 328--339. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Julia Chuzhoy. Routing in undirected graphs with constant congestion. In Proc. of ACM STOC, pages 855--874, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Julia Chuzhoy and Shi Li. A polylogarithimic approximation algorithm for edge-disjoint paths with congestion 2. In Proc. of IEEE FOCS, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E.D. Demaine and M Hajiaghayi. The Bidimensionality Theory and Its Algorithmic Applications. The Computer Journal, 51(3):292--302, November 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Erik Demaine, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, and Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi. Algorithmic graph minor theory: Improved grid minor bounds and Wagner's contraction. Algorithmica, 54:142--180, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Erik D Demaine and MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi. Quickly deciding minor-closed parameters in general graphs. European Journal of Combinatorics, 28(1):311--314, January 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Reinhard Diestel. Graph Theory, 4th Edition, volume 173 of Graduate texts in mathematics. Springer, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Reinhard Diestel, Tommy R. Jensen, Konstantin Yu. Gorbunov, and Carsten Thomassen. Highly connected sets and the excluded grid theorem. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B, 75(1):61--73, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fedor V. Fomin, Saket Saurabh, and Dimitrios M. Thilikos. Strengthening Erdos-Pósa property for minor-closed graph classes. Journal of Graph Theory, 66(3):235--240, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. R. Hind and O. Oellermann. Menger-type results for three or more vertices. Congressus Numerantium, 113:179--204, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K. Kawarabayashi and Y. Kobayashi. Linear min-max relation between the treewidth of H-minor-free graphs and its largest grid minor. In Proc. of STACS, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rohit Khandekar, Satish Rao, and Umesh Vazirani. Graph partitioning using single commodity flows. J. ACM, 56(4):19:1--19:15, July 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Stephan Kreutzer and Siamak Tazari. On brambles, grid-like minors, and parameterized intractability of monadic second-order logic. In Proc. of ACM-SIAM SODA, pages 354--364, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Alexander Leaf and Paul Seymour. Tree-width and planar minors. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. W. Mader. A reduction method for edge connectivity in graphs. Ann. Discrete Math., 3:145--164, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Harald R\"acke. Minimizing congestion in general networks. In Proc. of IEEE FOCS, pages 43--52, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Satish Rao and Shuheng Zhou. Edge disjoint paths in moderately connected graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 39(5):1856--1887, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Bruce Reed. Surveys in Combinatorics, chapter Treewidth and Tangles: A New Connectivity Measure and Some Applications. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Bruce A Reed and David R Wood. Polynomial treewidth forces a large grid-like-minor. European Journal of Combinatorics, 33(3):374--379, April 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. N Robertson, P Seymour, and R Thomas. Quickly Excluding a Planar Graph. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 62(2):323--348, November 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Neil Robertson and P D Seymour. Graph minors. V. Excluding a planar graph. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 41(1):92--114, August 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Neil Robertson and Paul D Seymour. Graph minors. XIII. the disjoint paths problem. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 63(1):65--110, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mohit Singh and Lap Chi Lau. Approximating minimum bounded degree spanning trees to within one of optimal. In David S. Johnson and Uriel Feige, editors, STOC, pages 661--670. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. C Thomassen. On the presence of disjoint subgraphs of a specified type. Journal of Graph Theory, 12(1):101--111, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Excluded Grid Theorem: Improved and Simplified

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        STOC '15: Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
        June 2015
        916 pages
        ISBN:9781450335362
        DOI:10.1145/2746539

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 June 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        STOC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate93of347submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        STOC '24
        56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
        June 24 - 28, 2024
        Vancouver , BC , Canada

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader