skip to main content
10.1145/2750858.2806061acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Transferring positioning model for device-free passive indoor localization

Published:07 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a new method that makes it easy for us to construct a positioning model for device-free passive indoor localization by using model transfer techniques. With device-free passive indoor positioning, a wireless sensor network is used to detect the movement of a person based on the fact that RF signals transmitted between a transmitter and a receiver are affected by human movement. However, because device-free passive indoor positioning relies on machine learning techniques, we must collect labeled training data at many training points in an end user's environment. This paper proposes a method that transfers a signal strength model used for locating a person obtained in another environment (source environment) to the end user environment. With the transferred models, we can construct a positioning model for the end user environment inexpensively. Our evaluation showed that our method achieved almost the same positioning performance as a supervised method that requires labeled training data obtained in an end user's environment.

References

  1. Chen, S., Chen, Y., and Trappe, W. Exploiting environmental properties for wireless localization and location aware applications. In PerCom 2008 (2008), 90--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chen, Y.-C., Chiang, J.-R., Chu, H.-h., Huang, P., and Tsui, A. W. Sensor-assisted Wi-Fi indoor location system for adapting to environmental dynamics. In ACM International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (2005), 118--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. De Toledo, A. F., Turkmani, A. M., and Parsons, J. Estimating coverage of radio transmission into and within buildings at 900, 1800, and 2300 MHz. IEEE Personal Communications 5, 2 (1998), 40--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Deak, G., Curran, K., Condell, J., and Londonderry, U. Device-free passive localization using RSSI-based wireless network nodes. In Postgraduate Symposium on the Convergence of Telecommunications, Networking and Broadcasting (PGNet 2010) (2010), 241--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Doucet, A. Sequential Monte Carlo methods. Wiley Online Library, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Erceg, V., Greenstein, L. J., Tjandra, S. Y., Parkoff, S. R., Gupta, A., Kulic, B., Julius, A. A., and Bianchi, R. An empirically based path loss model for wireless channels in suburban environments. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 17, 7 (1999), 1205--1211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ferris, B., Fox, D., and Lawrence, N. WiFi-SLAM using gaussian process latent variable models. In IJCAI 2007 (2007), 2480--2485. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hardegger, M., Tröster, G., and Roggen, D. Improved ActionSLAM for long-term indoor tracking with wearable motion sensors. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC2013) (2013), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jiang, Y., Pan, X., Li, K., Lv, Q., Dick, R. P., Hannigan, M., and Shang, L. ARIEL: Automatic-Wi-Fi based room fingerprinting for indoor localization. In Ubicomp 2012 (2012), 441--450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kim, Y., Chon, Y., and Cha, H. Smartphone-based collaborative and autonomous radio fingerprinting. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 42, 1 (2012), 112--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kosba, A. E., Abdelkader, A., and Youssef, M. Analysis of a device-free passive tracking system in typical wireless environments. In International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (2009), 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Krumm, J., Cermak, G., and Horvitz, E. Rightspot: A novel sense of location for a smart personal object. In UbiComp 2003 (2003), 36--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. LaMarca, A., Chawathe, Y., Consolvo, S., Hightower, J., Smith, I., Scott, J., Sohn, T., Howard, J., Hughes, J., Potter, F., et al. Place lab: Device positioning using radio beacons in the wild. In Pervasive 2005 (2005), 116--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Moré, J. J. The levenberg-marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. In Numerical analysis. 1978, 105--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Pan, S. J., Kwok, J. T., Yang, Q., and Pan, J. J. Adaptive localization in a dynamic WiFi environment through multi-view learning. In 22nd Assoc. for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2007), 1108--1113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Paul, A. S., Wan, E. A., Adenwala, F., Schafermeyer, E., Preiser, N., Kaye, J., and Jacobs, P. G. MobileRF: a robust device-free tracking system based on a hybrid neural network HMM classifier. In UbiComp 2014 (2014), 159--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Popleteev, A., Osmani, V., and Mayora, O. Investigation of indoor localization with ambient FM radio stations. In PerCom 2012 (2012), 171--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Priyantha, N. B., Chakraborty, A., and Balakrishnan, H. The cricket location-support system. In MobiCom 2000 (2000), 32--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rai, A., Chintalapudi, K. K., Padmanabhan, V. N., and Sen, R. Zee: Zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization. In MobiCom 2012 (2012), 293--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Robertson, P., Puyol, M. G., and Angermann, M. Collaborative pedestrian mapping of buildings using inertial sensors and FootSLAM. In International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Seidel, S. Y., Rappaport, T. S., Jain, S., Lord, M. L., and Singh, R. Path loss, scattering and multipath delay statistics in four European cities for digital cellular and microcellular radiotelephone. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 40, 4 (1991), 721--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Seifeldin, M., Saeed, A., Kosba, A., El-Keyi, A., and Youssef, M. Nuzzer: A large-scale device-free passive localization system for wireless environments. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 12, 7 (2012), 1321--1334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ubisense. Ubisense Web Site. http://www.ubisense.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang, H., Sen, S., Elgohary, A., Farid, M., Youssef, M., and Choudhury, R. R. No need to war-drive: Unsupervised indoor localization. In MobiSys 2012 (2012), 197--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wang, Y., Yang, X., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., and Cuthbert, L. Bluetooth positioning using RSSI and triangulation methods. In IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC 2013) (2013), 837--842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Want, R., Hopper, A., Falcão, V., and Gibbons, J. The active badge location system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 10, 1 (1992), 91--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Woodman, O., and Harle, R. Pedestrian localisation for indoor environments. In UbiComp 2008 (2008), 114--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Xu, C., Firner, B., Zhang, Y., Howard, R., Li, J., and Lin, X. Improving RF-based device-free passive localization in cluttered indoor environments through probabilistic classification methods. In International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2012) (2012), 209--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yin, J., Yang, Q., and Ni, L. Adaptive temporal radio maps for indoor location estimation. In PerCom 2005 (2005), 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Youssef, M., Mah, M., and Agrawala, A. Challenges: device-free passive localization for wireless environments. In MobiCom 2007 (2007), 222--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zebra Technologies. Zebra Technologies Web Site. http://www.zebra.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Transferring positioning model for device-free passive indoor localization

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
          September 2015
          1302 pages
          ISBN:9781450335744
          DOI:10.1145/2750858

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 September 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          UbiComp '15 Paper Acceptance Rate101of394submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader