skip to main content
10.1145/2789187.2789195acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tweeting live shows: a content analysis of live-tweets from three entertainment programs

Published:27 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we explored whether (and if so, how) live-tweets vary across different entertainment television programs in terms of the tweets' content. Using the 2013 Oscars, the Season 3 finale of Downton Abbey, and the 2014 Super Bowl as case studies, we collected over 200,000 live tweets sent during these three live entertainment programs and performed a content analysis of 4,400 of them. Results indicated that live-tweets, in general, reflect the features of the entertainment programs in many ways, suggesting that practitioners should incorporate more tailored social media strategies to better engage audiences. Theoretical implications and limitations were discussed in detail.

References

  1. Abbruzzese, J. 2014. Facebook is watching how you watch TV (Feburary 2014). Retrieved April 12, 2015 from: http://mashable.com/2014/02/10/facebooks-tv-data/?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburnerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adashed, A. 2014. Nielsen reveals the TV season's top shows on Twitter. (June 2014). Retrieved August 20, 2014 from: https://blog.twitter.com/2014/nielsen-reveals-the-tv-seasons-top-shows-on-twitterGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bibel, S. 2014. 'Pretty Little Liars' is the Most Tweeted TV Series of 2013. (January 2014). Retrieved September 10, 2014 from: http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/01/09/pretty-little-liars-is-the-most-tweeted-tv-series-of-2013/228058/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G. 2013. Twitter Amplify partnerships: Great content, great brands, great engagement. (May 2013). Retrieved February 22, 2014 from: https://blog.twitter.com/2013/twitter-amplify-partnerships-great-content-great-brands-great-engagementGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chase, C. 2014. Germany's World Cup rout of Brazil was the most tweeted event in history. (July 2014). Retrieved August 20, 2014 from: http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/07/germany-brazil-most-tweeted-event-history-miley-cyrusGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Coonan, C. 2014. Chinese Theaters Test System of Onscreen Text Messages During Movies. (August 2014). Retrieved September 1, 2014 from: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/chinese-theaters-test-system-onscreen-726204Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Doughty, M., Rowland, D., and Lawson, S. 2011. Co-viewing TV with Twitter: more interesting than the shows? CHI2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Doughty, M., Rowland, D., and Lawson, S. 2012. Who is on your sofa? TV audience communities and second screening social networks. In Proceedings of the 10th Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) European Conference on Interactive Television and Video. ACM. New York, NY, 79--86. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2325616.2325635. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Grey, M. 2013. Nielsen study shows connection between TV ratings and Twitter activity. (August 2013). Retrieved September 4, 2013 from: http://www.engadget.com/2013/08/06/nielsen-study-shows-connection-between-tv-ratings-and-twitter-ac/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayes, A. F. and Krippendorff, K. 2007. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures 1, 1, 77--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Highfield, T., Bruns, A., and Harrington, S. 2012. Tweeting le Tour: Connecting the Tour de France's Global Audience through Twitter. Paper presented at the European Communication Conference (ECREA) (Istanbul, 26 Oct. 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Huotari, K. 2013. Live-tweeter - an Empowered TV Viewer. (October 2013). Retrieved February 22, 2015 from: http://virtual.vtt.fi/virtual/nextmedia/Deliverables-2012/D2.0.3.1_Live-tweeter%20-%20an%20Empowered%20TV%20Viewer.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ji, Q. and Raney, A. A. 2015. Morally judging entertainment: a case study of live tweeting during Downton Abbey. Media Psychology, 18, 2, 221--242. DOI= 10.1080/15213269.2014.956939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Johns, M. 2012. Two Screen Viewing and Social Relationships. Exploring the invisible backchannel of TV viewing. In Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication And Technology 2012. (Murdoch. Australia) Murdoch University, 333--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lochrie, M. and Coulton, P. 2012. Sharing the viewing experience through second screens. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive TV and Video. ACM, New York, NY, 199--202. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2325616.2325655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. McPherson, K., Huotari, K., Cheng, F., Humphrey, D., Cheshire, C., and Brooks, A. L. 2012. Glitter: a mixed-methods study of twitter use during glee broadcasts. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion. ACM, New York, NY, 167--170. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2141512.2141569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nielsen. 2013. Nielsen Launches Nielsen Twitter TV Ratings. (October 2013). Retrieved March 5, 2014 from: http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/press-room/2013/nielsen-launches-nielsen-twitter-tv-ratings.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Richmond, W. 2014. Study: Still Early Days for Second Screen Usage With TV Programs. (January 2014). Retrieved February 16, 2015 from: http://iq.videonuze.com/article/study-still-early-days-for-second-screen-usage-with-tv-programsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Schirra, S., Sun, H., and Bentley, F. 2014. Together alone: Motivations for live-tweeting a television series. In Proceedings of the 2014 Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI). ACM. New York, NY. 2441--2450. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557070. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Skibbe, L. (2013). An Exploratory Study of Content of Tweets, Situation of Tweeting and Motivations to Use Twitter while Watching Television Series. Unpublished master's thesis, Stockholm University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wohn, D. Y., and Na, E.-K. 2011. Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday. 16, 3 (Mar. 2011). DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i3.3368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yu, Y., and Wang, X. 2015. World Cup 2014 in the Twitter world: A big data analysis of sentiments in US sports fans' tweets. Computers in Human Behavior 48, 392--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tweeting live shows: a content analysis of live-tweets from three entertainment programs

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SMSociety '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Media & Society
            July 2015
            122 pages
            ISBN:9781450339230
            DOI:10.1145/2789187

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 July 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            SMSociety '15 Paper Acceptance Rate20of47submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader