skip to main content
10.1145/2795122.2795123acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tareador: a tool to unveil parallelization strategies at undergraduate level

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a methodology and framework designed to assist students in the process of finding appropriate task decomposition strategies for their sequential program, as well as identifying bottlenecks in the later execution of the parallel program. One of the main components of this framework is Tareador, which provides a simple API to specify potential task decomposition strategies for a sequential program. Once the student proposes how to break the sequential code into tasks, Tareador 1) provides information about the dependences between tasks that should be honored when implementing that task decomposition using a parallel programming model; and 2) estimates the potential parallelism that could be achieved in an ideal parallel architecture with infinite processors; and 3) simulates the parallel execution on an ideal architecture estimating the potential speed--up that could be achieved on a number of processors. The pedagogical style of the methodology is currently applied to teach parallelism in a third-year compulsory subject in the Bachelor Degree in Informatics Engineering at the Barcelona School of Informatics of the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) - BarcelonaTech.

References

  1. E. Ayguadé and R. M. Badia. Unveiling parallelization strategies at undergraduate level. HPC Educator, Supercomputing 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barcelona Supercomputing Center. BSC Performance Tools.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcelona Supercomputing Center. Tareador Portal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Brown, Y.-H. Lu, and S. Midkiff. Introducing parallel programming in undergraduate curriculum. In Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops PhD Forum (IPDPSW), 2013 IEEE 27th International, pages 1269--1274, May 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Critical Blue. Prism. http://www.criticalblue.com/, active on 10.11.2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. de Freitas. Introducing parallel programming to traditional undergraduate courses. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 1--6, Oct 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Garcia, D. Jeon, C. M. Louie, and M. B. Taylor. Kremlin: rethinking and rebooting gprof for the multicore age. In PLDI, pages 458--469, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. L. Graham. The MPI 2.2 Standard and the Emerging MPI 3 Standard. In Proceedings of the 16th European PVM/MPI Users' Group Meeting on Recent Advances in Parallel Virtual Machine and Message Passing Interface, pages 2--2, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Intel Corporation. Intel Parallel Advisor. http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-advisor-xe, active on 10.11.2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Krste Asanovic et al. The landscape of parallel computing research: A view from berkeley. Technical Report UCB/EECS-2006-183, U. of California, Berkeley, Dec 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. Lattner and V. Adve. LLVM: A compilation framework for lifelong program analysis and transformation. In Intl. Symp. on Code Generation & Optimization, pages 75--88, San Jose, CA, USA, Mar 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Mak, K.-F. Faxén, S. Janson, and A. Mycroft. Estimating and Exploiting Potential Parallelism by Source-Level Dependence Profiling. In Euro-Par (1), pages 26--37, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Minaie and R. Sanati-Mehrizy. Incorporating parallel computing in undergraduate computer science curriculum. In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. NSF/TCPP. Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Computing Education. http://cs.gsu.edu/tcpp/curriculum/?q=edupar.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nvidia. CUDA Parallel Computing Platform.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. OpenMP Architecture Review Board. OpenMP 4.0 Specification.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Pheatt. Intel threading building blocks. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 23(4):298--298, apr 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. V. Subotic, A. Campos, A. Velasco, E. Ayguade, J. Labarta, and M. Valero. The unbearable lightness of exploring parallelism. In 8th International Parallel Tools Workshop, Stuttgart, Germany, October 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Vector Fabrics. Pareon. http://www.vectorfabrics.com/products, active on 10.11.2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WCAE '15: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Architecture Education
    June 2015
    64 pages
    ISBN:9781450337175
    DOI:10.1145/2795122

    Copyright © 2015 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 June 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    WCAE '15 Paper Acceptance Rate9of10submissions,90%Overall Acceptance Rate9of10submissions,90%

    Upcoming Conference

    ISCA '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader