skip to main content
10.1145/2808435.2808436acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"There Is No Rose Without A Thorn": An Assessment of a Game Design Experience for Children

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Game design is recently conducted at school for eliciting children's design ideas about games for them. However, game design is a complex interaction design task, requiring rather mature cognitive skills. This paper reflects on it, reporting a gamified game design experience with groups of children in primary schools.

References

  1. B. Brederode, P. Markopoulos, M. Gielen, A. Vermeeren, and H. De Ridder. pOwerball: The design of a novel mixed-reality game for children with mixed abilities. In Proc. of IDC 2005, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Brondino, G. Dodero, R. Gennari, A. Melonio, M. Pasini, D. Raccanello, and S. Torello. Emotions and Inclusion in Co-Design at School: Let's Measure Them! In Proc. of Methods and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (MIS4TEL'14). Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Cohen. Making Cooperative Learning Equitable. Educational Leadership, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Derboven, M. Van Mechelen, and K. Slegers. Multimodal Analysis in Participatory Design with Children: A Primary School Case Study. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '15, pages 2825--2828, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Dodero, R. Gennari, A. Melonio, and S. Torello. Gamified Co-design with Cooperative Learning. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '14, pages 707--718, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Dodero, R. Gennari, A. Melonio, and S. Torello. Towards Tangible Gamified Co-design at School: Two Studies in Primary Schools. In Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY '14, pages 77--86, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. A. Fails, M. L. Guha, and A. Druin. Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children. Now Publishers Inc., Hanover, MA, USA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Fredericks and W. McColskey. The Measurement of Student Engagement: a Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, and C. Wylie, editors, Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pages 763--782. Springer, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. F. Garzotto. Broadening Children's Involvement as Design Partners: from Technology to "Experience". In ACM, editor, Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children, IDC'08, pages 186--193, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. D. Hanus and J. Fox. Assessing the Effects of Gamification in the Classroom: A Longitudinal Study on Intrinsic motivation, Social Comparison, Satisfaction, Effort, and Academic Performance. Computers & Education, 80(0):152--161, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Hattie. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Hunicke, M. Leblanc, and R. Zubek. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. In Proceedings of Challenges in Games AI Workshop, 19th National Conference of Artificial Intelligence, pages 1--5, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Kafai. Software by Kids for Kids. Communications of the ACM, 39(4):38--39, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Kafai. Children Designing Software for Children: What Can We Learn? In ACM, editor, Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children 2003, IDC'2003, pages 11--12, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Kagan and S. Kagan. Cooperative Learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. K. Kapp. The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. Wiley, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Mazzone. Designing with Children: Reflections on Effective Involvement of Children in the Interaction Design Process. Phd thesis, University of Central Lancashire, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. McGonical. Reality is Broken. Penguin, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Moser, M. Tscheligi, B. Zaman, V. Vanden-Abeele, L. Geurts, M. Vandewaetere, P. Markopoulos, and P. Wyeth, editors. Special Issue: Learning from Failures in Game Design for Children, volume 2. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, May 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. V. Nesset and A. Large. Children in the Information Technology Design Process: A Review of Theories and Their Applications. Library & Information Science Research, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. P. Paulus and B. Nijstad. Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. Scaife, Y. Rogers, F. Aldrich, and M. Davies. Designing for or Designing with? Informant Design for Interactive Learning Environments. In Proc. of CHI'97, pages 343--350. ACM, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Shernoff, M. Csikszentmihalyi, B. Schneider, and E. S. Shernoff. Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18:158--176, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R. E. Slavin. Student Team Learning: a Practical Guide to Cooperative Learning. DC: National Education Association of the United States, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Vaajakallio, J. Lee, and T. Mattelmäki. "It Has to Be a Group Work!": Co-design With Children. In Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children, IDC'09, pages 246--249. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "There Is No Rose Without A Thorn": An Assessment of a Game Design Experience for Children

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              CHItaly '15: Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter
              September 2015
              195 pages
              ISBN:9781450336840
              DOI:10.1145/2808435

              Copyright © 2015 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 28 September 2015

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              CHItaly '15 Paper Acceptance Rate31of59submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate109of242submissions,45%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader