skip to main content
10.1145/2808719.2812591acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How do Twitter, Wikipedia, and Harrison's principles of medicine describe heart attacks?

Published:09 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media, such as Wikipedia and Twitter, are an increasingly common source of medical information, including for medical students. It is unknown how medical information in social media compares to medical information in medical textbooks. Here we compare Wikipedia articles on heart attacks and palpitations and tweets mentioning heart attacks and palpitations to chapters from Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine and Braunwald's Heart Disease on myocardial infarction and cardiac dysrhythmias. For heart attacks, the chapters from Harrison's had higher Jaccard similarity to Wikipedia than Braunwald's or Twitter. For palpitations, no pair of sources had a higher Jaccard (token) similarity than any other pair. For no source was the Jaccard (token) similarity attributable to semantic similarity. This suggests that technical and popular sources of medical information focus on different aspects of medicine, rather than one describing a simplified version of the other. We hope our work motivates further investigation into the representation of medical knowledge in different media.

References

  1. {Allahwala et al. 2013} Usaid K Allahwala, Aniket Nadkarni, and Deshan F Sebaratnam. 2013. Wikipedia use amongst medical students--New insights into the digital revolution. Medical teacher 35, 4 (2013), 337--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {Cadogan et al. 2014} Mike Cadogan, Brent Thoma, Teresa M Chan, and Michelle Lin. 2014. Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002-2013). Emergency Medicine Journal (2014), emermed--2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {Francis and Kucera 1979} W Nelson Francis and Henry Kucera. 1979. Brown corpus manual. Brown University (1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. {Jiang and Conrath 1997} Jay J Jiang and David W Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. arXiv preprint cmp-lg/9709008 (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. {Judd and Kennedy 2011} Terry Judd and Gregor Kennedy. 2011. Expediency-based practice? Medical students' reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries. British Journal of Educational Technology 42, 2 (2011), 351--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. {Lapointe and Legendre 1994} Francois-Joseph Lapointe and Pierre Legendre. 1994. A classification of pure malt Scotch whiskies. Applied Statistics (1994), 237--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. {Longo et al. 2014} Dan Longo, Anthony Fauci, Dennis Kasper, and Stephen Hauser. 2014. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 19th edition. McGraw-Hill Professional.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. {Mann et al. 2014} Douglas L Mann, Douglas P Zipes, Peter Libby, and Robert O Bonow. 2014. Braunwald's heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. {Miller 1995} George A Miller. 1995. WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 11 (1995), 39--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {Pender et al. 2009} Michael P Pender, Kaye E Lasserre, Lisa M Kruesi, Chris B Del Mar, and Satyamurthy Anuradha. 2009. Is Wikipedia unsuitable as a clinical information resource for medical students? Medical teacher 31, 12 (2009), 1095--1096Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How do Twitter, Wikipedia, and Harrison's principles of medicine describe heart attacks?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BCB '15: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics
      September 2015
      683 pages
      ISBN:9781450338530
      DOI:10.1145/2808719

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      BCB '15 Paper Acceptance Rate48of141submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate254of885submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader