skip to main content
research-article

The Perception of Lighting Inconsistencies in Composite Outdoor Scenes

Published:08 September 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

It is known that humans can be insensitive to large changes in illumination. For example, if an object of interest is extracted from one digital photograph and inserted into another, we do not always notice the differences in illumination between the object and its new background. This inability to spot illumination inconsistencies is often the key to success in digital “doctoring” operations. We present a set of experiments in which we explore the perception of illumination in outdoor scenes. Our results can be used to predict when and why inconsistencies go unnoticed. Applications of the knowledge gained from our studies include smarter digital “cut-and-paste” and digital “fake” detection tools, and image-based composite scene backgrounds for layout and previsualization.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Patrick Cavanagh. 2005. The artist as neuroscientist. Nature 434, 301--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Xiaowu Chen, Ke Wang, and Xin Jin. 2011. Single image based illumination estimation for lighting virtual object in real scene. In CAD Graphics 2011. 450--455. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cathy Ennis, Christopher Peters, and Carol O'Sullivan. 2008. Perceptual evaluation of position and orientation context rules for pedestrian formations. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV'08). 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cathy Ennis, Christopher Peters, and Carol O'Sullivan. 2011. Perceptual effects of scene context and viewpoint for virtual pedestrian crowds. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 8, 2 (Feb. 2011), Article 10, 22 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Hamill, R. McDonnell, S. Dobbyn, and C. O'Sullivan. 2005. Perceptual evaluation of impostor representations for virtual humans and buildings. Computer Graphics Forum 24, 3, 623--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Timothy Hospedales and Sethu Vijayakumar. 2009. Multisensory oddity detection as Bayesian inference. PLoS ONE 4, 1 (01 2009), e4205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kevin Karsch, Varsha Hedau, David Forsyth, and Derek Hoiem. 2011. Rendering synthetic objects into legacy photographs. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Asia'11) 30, 6 (Dec. 2011), 157:1--157:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kevin Karsch, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Nathan Carr, Hailin Jin, Rafael Fonte, Michael Sittig, and David Forsyth. 2014. Automatic scene inference for 3D object compositing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 33, 3 (May 2014), 32:1--32:15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jan J. Koenderink, Andrea J. van Doorn, Astrid M. L. Kappers, Susan F. Te Pas, and Sylvia C. Pont. 2003. Illumination direction from texture shading. JOSA A 20, 6, 987--995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jan J. Koenderink, Andrea J. van Doorn, and Sylvia C. Pont. 2004. Light direction from shad(ow)ed random Gaussian surfaces. Perception 33, 12, 1405--1420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jean-Francois Lalonde and Alexei A. Efros. 2007. Using color compatibility for assessing image realism. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'07). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jean-François Lalonde, Alexei A. Efros, and Srinivasa G. Narasimhan. 2009. Webcam clip art: Appearance and illuminant transfer from time-lapse sequences. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Asia'09) 28, 5 (Dec. 2009), 131:1--131:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jean-François Lalonde, Alexei A. Efros, and Srinivasa G. Narasimhan. 2012. Estimating the natural illumination conditions from a single outdoor image. International Journal of Computer Vision 98, 2, 123--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jean-François Lalonde and Iain Matthews. 2014. Lighting estimation in outdoor image collections. In Proc. of the International Conference on 3-D Vision (3DV'14). 131--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jorge Lopez-Moreno, Elena Garces, Sunil Hadap, Erik Reinhard, and Diego Gutierrez. 2013. Multiple light source estimation in a single image. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 8, 170--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jorge Lopez-Moreno, Veronica Sundstedt, Francisco Sangorrin, and Diego Gutierrez. 2010. Measuring the perception of light inconsistencies. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV'10). ACM, New York, NY, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yuri Ostrovsky, Patrick Cavanagh, and Pawan Sinha. 2005. Perceiving illumination inconsistencies in scenes. Perception 34 (Nov. 2005), 1301--1314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Carol O'Sullivan and Cathy Ennis. 2011. Metropolis: Multisensory simulation of a populated city. In Proceedings of the 2011 3rd International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES'11). 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. J. Preetham, Peter Shirley, and Brian Smits. 1999. A practical analytic model for daylight. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1999. 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Erik Reinhard, Michael Ashikhmin, Bruce Gooch, and Peter Shirley. 2001. Color transfer between images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, special issue on Applied Perception 21, 5 (Sept. 2001), 34--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Su Xue, Aseem Agarwala, Julie Dorsey, and Holly Rushmeier. 2012. Understanding and improving the realism of image composites. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 4, 84:1--84:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Perception of Lighting Inconsistencies in Composite Outdoor Scenes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
        ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 12, Issue 4
        Special Issue SAP 2015
        September 2015
        77 pages
        ISSN:1544-3558
        EISSN:1544-3965
        DOI:10.1145/2821016
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 September 2015
        • Received: 1 July 2015
        • Accepted: 1 July 2015
        Published in tap Volume 12, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader