skip to main content
10.1145/2818187.2818273acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Associating event logs with ontologies for semantic process mining and analysis

Published:22 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Process mining uses various forms of event logs to extract process-related information, in order to discover, analyze conformance, or to enhance (business) processes. The vast majority of process mining applications are based on event logs with flat, keyword-based activity and resource descriptions. Many human-designed processes, however, are based on explicit workflow or lifecycle models with associated product models, both of which can be described using taxonomies or more complicated ontologies. This additional information can be used to analyze and visualize the processes with better insight of and improved formal access to the data. In this paper, we introduce a generic approach for enriching process mining using events logs with associated ontology structures. The main contribution and benefit of this approach lies in the ability to analyze the models in different abstraction levels, which greatly helps understanding complicated processes. Our main application areas are related to engineering and documentation processes.

References

  1. Aalst, W. M. P. van der, 2011. Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes by W. M. P. van der Aalst, Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aalst, W. M. P., van der, 2015. Extracting Event Data from Databases to Unleash Process Mining. In J. Vom Brocke and T. Schmiedel, editors, Business Process Management Roundtable 2014, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Available at http://www.processmining.org/_media/blogs/pub2015/z7.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Apache Jena - Home. Available at https://jena.apache.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Baader, F., Horrocks, I., and Sattler, U. 2007. Description Logics. In Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Elsevier. Available at http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/people/ian.horrocks/Publications/download/2007/BaHS07a.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Compton, M., Barnaghi, P., Bermudez, L. Garcia-Castro, R., Corcho, O., Cox, S., Graybeal, J. Hauswirth, M., Henson, C., Herzog, A., Huang, V., Janowicz, K., Kelsey, W. D., Le Phuoc, D., Lefort, L., Leggieri, M., Neuhaus, H., Nikolov, A., Page, K., Passant, A., Sheth, A., and Taylor, K. 2012. The SSN Ontology of the W3C Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group. Journal of Web Semantics, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Glimm, B., and Ogbuji, C. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes. W3C Recommendation 21 March 2013. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Graylog home page. Available at https://www.graylog.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Harmonization of Pump Schemas with the ISO 15926 Reference Data Library. Fiatech. 2011. Available at http://www.automation.com/pdf_articles/aex_hi_report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, S,. & Seaborne, A. 2013. (Eds.) SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. W3C Recommendation 21 March 2013. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P. F., and Rudolph, S. 2012. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (2nd Ed.). W3C Recommendation 11 December 2012. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lefort, L., Henson, C., and Taylor, K. 2001. Semantic Sensor Network XG Final Report. W3C Incubator Group Report 28 June 2011. Available at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/XGR-ssn-20110628/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Medeiros, A. K. A. de, Aalst, W. van der, and Pedrinaci, C. 2008. Semantic process mining tools: core building blocks. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, 9--11 June 2008, Galway, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitchell, T., 1997. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Noy, N. 2005. (Ed.). Representing Classes As Property Values on the Semantic Web. W3C Working Group Note 5 April 2005. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-classes-as-values/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pellet in GitHub. Available at https://github.com/complexible/pelletGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. ProM. Process Mining home page. Process Mining Group, Math&CS department, Eindhoven University of Technology. Available at http://www.processmining.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Protégé Ontology Editor. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research. Available at http://protege.stanford.eduGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sheu, P., Yu, H., Ramamoorthy, C. V., Joshi, A. K., and Zadeh, L. A. 2010. Semantic Computing. Wiley-IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Straccia, U. 2013. Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Semantic Web Languages. Chapman and Hall/CRC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Verbeek, H. M. W., Buijs, J. C. A. M., Dongen, B. F. van, and Aalst, W. M. P. van der 2011. XES, XESame, and ProM 6. In P. Soffer & E. Proper (Eds.), Information Systems Evolution (CAiSE Forum 2010, Hammamet, Tunisia, June 7-9, 2010, Selected Extended Papers). (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 72, pp. 60--75). Berlin: Springer. Available at http://alexandria.tue.nl/openaccess/Metis248868.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zaharia, R., Medeiros, A. K. A de, Lessen, T., van, Nitzsche, J., and Liu, D. 2009. Process Execution Infrastructure Revision. Project IST 026850 SUPER: Semantics Utilized for Process management within and between Enterprises. Available at http://ip-super.kie.ue.poznan.pl/res/Deliverables/M36/D6.14.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Associating event logs with ontologies for semantic process mining and analysis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AcademicMindTrek '15: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
          September 2015
          230 pages
          ISBN:9781450339483
          DOI:10.1145/2818187

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 September 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          AcademicMindTrek '15 Paper Acceptance Rate33of51submissions,65%Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader