skip to main content
10.1145/2818187.2818298acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Developers' perspectives on iteration in game development

Published:22 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this article, the findings of an interview study on game developers' perspectives on iteration is presented. A two-part interview study conducted in 2010 and 2013--2014 suggests that from the perspective of game developers, iteration is an essential, natural and important part of the game development -- if not even a trivial part of the process. However, there is much to explore on the differences in practice and opinions revealing distinctive details in iterative processes potentially leading towards more elaborate design philosophies and methods on game development.

References

  1. Adams, E. 2009. Fundamentals of Game Design (2nd Edition). New Riders Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adams, R. S. and Atman, C. J. 2000. Characterizing engineering student design process - an illustration of iteration. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehm, B. W. 1986. A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. ACM Sigsoft Software Engineering Notes. Vol 11 no 4, Aug 1986, p 22--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boehm, B. W. 1988. Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. Computer. Volume 21 Issue 5, May 1988, (61--72). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cuthbert, D. 2013. Design Occlusion is Killing Your Creativity. Game Developers Conference 2013. GDC Vault. http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1017990/Design-Occlusionis-Killing-YourGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cross, Nigel. 2007. From a Design Science to a Design Discipline: Understanding Designerly Ways of Knowing and Thinking. In Michel, R. (ed.) Design Research Now. Essays and Selected Projects. Birkhäuser. (41--55).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Despain, W. (Ed.) 2012. 100 Principles of Game Design. New Riders.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorst, K. & Dijkhuis, J. 1995. "Comparing paradigms for describing design activity" Design Studies Vol 16 No 2 April. p. 261--274. Elsevier Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fullerton, T. 2008. Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. 2nd Edition. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jin, Y. & Chulsilp, P. 2005. Study of mental iteration in different design situations. Design Studies 27 (2006) 25--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Keith, C. 2010. Agile Game Development with Scrum. Pearson Education. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kultima, A. 2015. An Autopsy of the Global Game Jam 2012 Theme Committee Discussion: Deciding on Ouroboros. The Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kultima, A. 2010. The Organic Nature of Game Ideation: Game Ideas Arise from Solitude and Mature by Bouncing. FuturePlay 2010, Vancouver, Canada. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kultima, A. 2009. Casual Game Design Values. Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1621841.1621854 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kultima A, Alha K. 2010. "Hopefully Everything I'm Doing Has to Do with Innovation" Games industry professionals on innovation in 2009. Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE Consumer Electronic Society's Games Innovation Conference GIC 2010: IEEE, 41--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kultima, A. Kuittinen, J. Introduction: Changing Faces of Game Innovation. In Kultima, A. & Alha, K. (Eds.) Changing Faces of Game Innovation. GaIn and GIIP Research Project Report. TRIM Research Reports 4. University of Tampere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kultima, A., Köönikkä, J. & Karvinen, J. 2012. The Four Different Innovation Philosophies Guiding the Game Development Processes. An Experimental Study on Finnish Game Professionals Development Processes. In Kultima, A. & Peltoniemi, M. (Eds.) (2012) Games and Innovation Research Seminar 2011 Working Papers. Research Reports 7. University of Tampere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kultima, A., Köönikkä, J., Saarinen, T., Karvinen, J., Alha, K. 2011. Changing Processes: Finnish Game Innovation Processes. In Kultima, A. & Alha, K. (Eds.) Changing Faces of Game Innovation. GaIn and GIIP Research Project Report. TRIM Research Reports 4. University of Tampere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kultima, A. & Peltoniemi, M. (Eds.) (2012) Games and Innovation Research Seminar 2011 Working Papers. Research Reports 7. University of Tampere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Larman, C. & Basili, V. R. 2003. Iterative and Incremental Development: A Brief History. Cover Feature. IEEE Computer. (June 2003). pp. 1--11 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lawson, B. 2004. What Designers Know. Architectural Press. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nielsen, Jakob. 1993. Iterative User Interface Design. IEEE Computer. Vol. 26, No. 11 (November 1993). pp. 32--41 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Royce, W. W. 1970. Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. Proceedings, IEEE WESCON, August 1970, pages 1--9. TRWGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Salen, K. & Zimmerman, E. 2004. Rules of Play. Game Design Fundamentals. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tschang, F. T. 2007. Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organization Science vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 989--1005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tschang, F. T. 2010. The interaction of roles, resources, and organizational structures in creative work. DRUID Summer Conference 2010. Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Developers' perspectives on iteration in game development

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AcademicMindTrek '15: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
          September 2015
          230 pages
          ISBN:9781450339483
          DOI:10.1145/2818187

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 September 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          AcademicMindTrek '15 Paper Acceptance Rate33of51submissions,65%Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader