skip to main content
10.1145/2818346.2820743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Spoken Interruptions Signal Productive Problem Solving and Domain Expertise in Mathematics

Published:09 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prevailing social norms prohibit interrupting another person when they are speaking. In this research, simultaneous speech was investigated in groups of students as they jointly solved math problems and peer tutored one another. Analyses were based on the Math Data Corpus, which includes ground-truth performance coding and speech transcriptions. Simultaneous speech was elevated 120-143% during the most productive phase of problem solving, compared with matched intervals. It also was elevated 18-37% in students who were domain experts, compared with non-experts. Qualitative analyses revealed that experts differed from non-experts in the function of their interruptions. Analysis of these functional asymmetries produced nine key behaviors that were used to identify the dominant math expert in a group with 95-100% accuracy in three minutes. This research demonstrates that overlapped speech is a marker of group problem-solving progress and domain expertise. It provides valuable information for the emerging field of learning analytics.

References

  1. Arthur, A., Lunsford, R., Wesson, M. & Oviatt, S.L. (2006) Prototyping novel collaborative multimodal systems: Simulation, data collection and analysis tools for the next decade, Eighth International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'06), ACM: New York, 209--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cetin, O. & Shriberg, L. (2006) Overlap in meetings: ASR effects and analysis by dialog factors, speakers, and collection site, Machine Learning and Multimodal Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, vol. 4299, 212--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., and Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dong, W., Kim, T. & Pentland, A. (2009) A Quantitative Analysis of Collective Creativity in Playing 20-Questions Games, ACM Creativity & Cognition, Berkeley, CA, October 27--30, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dral, J., Heylen, D. & op den Akker, R. (2008) Detecting uncertainty in spoken dialogues: An explorative research to the automatic detection of a speakers' uncertainty by using prosodic markers, Sentiment analysis: emotion, metaphor, ontology and terminology, Marrakech, Morocco, 72--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferguson, N. (1977) Simultaneous speech, interruptions, and dominance, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 295--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Krauss, R. & Chiu, C.-Y. (1997) Language and social behavior, in D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindsey (eds.) Handbook of social psychology, 4th edition, vol. 2, Boston: McGraw-Hill, 41--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Liscombe, J., Hirschberg, J. & Vendetti, J. (2005) Detecting certainness in spoken tutorial dialogs, Proc. of Interspeech Europeech, Lisbon, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lunsford, R., Oviatt, S. L. & Arthur, A. (2006) Toward open-microphone engagement for multiparty interactions, Eighth International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'06), ACM: New York, 273--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Luria, A. (1961) The Role of Speech in the Regulation of Normal and Abnormal Behavior, Liveright: NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oviatt, S.L. (2012) Multimodal interfaces, The HumanComputer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications (3rd ed.), (ed. by J. Jacko), LEA: Mahwah, NJ, chap. 18, 405--430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Oviatt, S.L. (2013a) Problem solving, domain expertise and learning: Ground-truth performance results for math data corpus, Second Intl. Grand Challenge Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics, December 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Oviatt, S.L. (2013b) The Design of Future Educational Interfaces, Routledge Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Oviatt, S., Cohen, A. & Weibel, N. (2013) Multimodal learning analytics: Description of math data corpus for ICMI grand challenge workshop, Second International Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics, Sydney Australia, Dec. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Oviatt, S., Cohen, A. & Weibel, N., Hang, K. & Thompson, K. (2014) Multimodal learning analytics data resources: Description of math data corpus and coded documents, Third Intl. Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics, Istanbul Turkey (for version with full appendices, see: http://mla.ucsd.edu/data/MMLA_Math_Data_Corpus.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Oviatt, S.L., Hang, K., Zhou, J., Yu, K. & Chen, F. (in press) Dynamic handwriting signal features predict domain expertise.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Purandare, A. & Litman, D. (2008) Content-learning correlations in spoken tutoring dialogs at word, turn, and discourse levels, Proc. of the 21st Intl. FLAIRS Conference, Coconut Grove, FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Roger, D. Bull, P. & Smith, S. (1988) The development of a comprehensive system for classifying interruptions, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 27--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, 50(4), 696--735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Schegloff, E.A. (2000) Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language in Society, 29:1, 1--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Scherer, S., Weibel, N., Oviatt, S. & Morency, L.P. (2012) Multimodal prediction of expertise and leadership in learning groups, Proc. of the First International Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics, ACM: N.Y. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shriberg, L., Stolcke, A. & Baron, D. (2001) Observations on Overlap: Findings and implications for automatic processing of multi-party conversation, Proc. of Eurospeech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Vygotsky, L. (1962) Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. (Transl. by Hanfmann & Vakar from 1934 original).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Worsley, M. & Blikstein, P. (2010) Toward the development of learning analytics: Student speech as an automatic and natural form of assessment, AERA Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Zimmerman, B. (2006) Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs, The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (ed. by K. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich & R. Hoffman), Cambridge University Press: New York, 705--722.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Spoken Interruptions Signal Productive Problem Solving and Domain Expertise in Mathematics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMI '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
      November 2015
      678 pages
      ISBN:9781450339124
      DOI:10.1145/2818346

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICMI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate52of127submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader