skip to main content
10.1145/2818346.2820769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A Visual Analytics Approach to Finding Factors Improving Automatic Speaker Identifications

Published:09 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Classification quality criteria such as precision, recall, and F-measure are generally the basis for evaluating contributions in automatic speaker recognition. Specifically, comparisons are carried out mostly via mean values estimated on a set of media. Whilst this approach is relevant to assess improvement w.r.t. the state-of-the-art, or ranking participants in the context of an automatic annotation challenge, it gives little insight to system designers in terms of cues for improving algorithms, hypothesis formulation, and evidence display. This paper presents a design study of a visual and interactive approach to analyze errors made by automatic annotation algorithms. A timeline-based tool emerged from prior steps of this study. A critical review, driven by user interviews, exposes caveats and refines user objectives. The next step of the study is then initiated by sketching designs combining elements of the current prototype to principles newly identified as relevant.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Adobe Premiere Pro CC, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. O. Aubert and Y. Prié. Advene: active reading through hypervideo. In ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pages 235--244, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Bruneau, M. Stefas, H. Bredin, A.-P. Ta, T. Tamisier, and C. Barras. A Web-Based Tool for the Visual Analysis of Media Annotations. In IV 2014, pages 145--150, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Charlet, J. Poignant, H. Bredin, C. Fredouille, and S. Meignier. What Makes a Speaker Recognizable in TV Broadcast? Going Beyond Speaker Identification Error Rate. In ERRARE Workshop, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Ercolessi, H. Bredin, and C. Sénac. StoViz: story visualization of TV series. In ACM Multimedia, pages 1329--1330, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Giraudel, M. Carré, V. Mapelli, J. Kahn, O. Galibert, and L. Quintard. The REPERE Corpus: a multimodal corpus for person recognition. In LREC, pages 1102--1107, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. S. Greenberg, A. Martin, and M. Przybocki. The 2011 best speaker recognition interim assessment. In Odyssey, pages 275--282, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. S. Greenberg, V. M. Stanford, A. F. Martin, M. Yadagiri, G. R. Doddington, J. J. Godfrey, and J. Hernandez-Cordero. The 2012 NIST speaker recognition evaluation. In INTERSPEECH, pages 1971--1975, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Johansson Fernstad, J. Shaw, and J. Johansson. Quality-based guidance for exploratory dimensionality reduction. Information Visualization, 12(1):44--64, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Kapoor, B. Lee, D. Tan, and E. Horvitz. Interactive optimization for steering machine classification. In CHI, pages 1343--1352, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Kipp. Anvil: The video annotation research tool. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE TVCG, 18(12):2431--2440, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. J. Stubben and B. G. Milligan. Estimating and analyzing demographic models using the popbio package in R. J. Stat. Softw., 22(11), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. F. W. Young, P. M. Valero-Mora, and M. Friendly. Visual statistics: seeing data with dynamic interactive graphics. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Visual Analytics Approach to Finding Factors Improving Automatic Speaker Identifications

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                ICMI '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
                November 2015
                678 pages
                ISBN:9781450339124
                DOI:10.1145/2818346

                Copyright © 2015 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 9 November 2015

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • short-paper

                Acceptance Rates

                ICMI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate52of127submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader